Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Got a call from SkyWest today, but................ >

Got a call from SkyWest today, but................

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Got a call from SkyWest today, but................

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-06-2008 | 09:23 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
From: Former EMB 120 Jr. Water Boy, CRJ newbee
Default

Originally Posted by Waldo11
I interviewed Jun 11th and was hired into the CRJ pool I'm guessing cause the study guide they sent me had CRJ's all over it (and CRJ Procedures in it). Was kind of surprised cause I too was under the assumption that the Brazilla was undermanned. Skywest said they had no clue when my class date would be.
Your assumption is correct.....undermaned in the EMB FO side....fat on EMB capts. Been that way for a long time and going to stay that way I am sure. And for you class......I figure you will be swimming in the pool for awhile?
Reply
Old 07-07-2008 | 01:08 PM
  #32  
JetJock16's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
From: SkyWest Capt.
Default

Originally Posted by ANPBird
Your assumption is correct.....undermaned in the EMB FO side....fat on EMB capts. Been that way for a long time and going to stay that way I am sure. And for you class......I figure you will be swimming in the pool for awhile?
I wouldn’t say that we're "fat" when it comes to EMB CA's. Yes we have 99 CA's and 71 lines in FAT but FAT holds the majority of reserves for the EMB system. I would say that we are now properly staffed when it comes to EMB CA's and understaffed when it comes to EMB FO's.

We had 37 total reserve EMB CA’s system wide for July and 22 of them are in FAT, with only 16 reserve EMB FO’s system wide and 0 of them are in FAT. That’s a reserve %age of 14% for CA’s and 6% for FO’s. On the RJ we have 186 reserve CA’s and 202 reserve FO’s which equates to a reserve %age of 16% for CA’s and 17% for FO’s. SLC, DEN and ORD staff the majority of the RJ reserves. SLC has 19% of their FO’s sitting reserve and 15% of their CA’s. In DEN the FO/CA %ages are 25%/25% and ORD is 29%/24%.

When you look at the number of reserves system wide you'll see that we're just barely overstaffed when it comes to our current RJ FLT load, properly staffed on the EMB for CA's and understaffed when it comes to EMB FO's. Now if we lose flying or decrease anywhere then those %ages will rise. This is why everything has being cancelled (new hires, transitions & upgrades), Mgmnt wants attrition to whittle away at the above numbers and if we do decrease in flying then look for SKW to displace a class or two of RJ FO’s to the EMB.

BTW, the above numbers do take into account suspended (FMLA, MIL, Med, TRN, etc) pilots.

Last edited by JetJock16; 07-07-2008 at 01:16 PM.
Reply
Old 07-07-2008 | 08:42 PM
  #33  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Skywest poolie
Default

Makes sense - any word on how long they're going to wait before brasilia FO staffing is so critical that they displace fo's or start a new hire class? I suppose losing more united flying would be the deciding point as to whether rj fo's are displaced to the brasilia vs new hires staffing the brasilias...
Reply
Old 07-07-2008 | 09:13 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,846
Likes: 9
Default

Like JetJock said, we are very nearly properly staffed. With the small attrition we've been seeing, it would take a fairly deep cut in flying come fall to see any displacements. I would expect voluntary LOA's as well (but when is that not a good thing ).
Reply
Old 07-08-2008 | 05:12 AM
  #35  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,217
Likes: 0
Default

So do you think they will be hiring (and place in a pool) through the end of year?
Reply
Old 07-08-2008 | 08:13 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,846
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by cfii2007
So do you think they will be hiring (and place in a pool) through the end of year?
I would say that yes, that is a good possibility...!
Reply
Old 07-08-2008 | 01:11 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
From: RJ Captain
Default

They're still letting PBS build lines crediting over 90 hours. If we see a big reduction in flying the first thing they'll do is limit everyone to 75-80 hours for the monthly bid award. They've done that in the past when the flying has been cut back. Back in the days of hard lines we had months when the highest paying line on had 77-78 hours.
Reply
Old 07-08-2008 | 06:16 PM
  #38  
JetJock16's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,963
Likes: 0
From: SkyWest Capt.
Default

Originally Posted by Utah
They're still letting PBS build lines crediting over 90 hours. If we see a big reduction in flying the first thing they'll do is limit everyone to 75-80 hours for the monthly bid award. They've done that in the past when the flying has been cut back. Back in the days of hard lines we had months when the highest paying line on had 77-78 hours.
Absolutely, they will reduce everyone’s lines to the bare minimum and offer voluntary LOA's long before they put one pilot on the street. Even if we completely lose Midwest I can't see SKW furloughing. It will take deeper cuts than that to push Jerry and friends end one of their most prized records. That’s 36+ years of no furloughs, but if things really take a turn for the worst then they will and they will do it with a very…………………….very heavy heart.

In my opinion…………………….and keep in mind that this is just my opinion……………………SKW won’t furlough seeing that we will back fill some of the voids felt from UAL pulling their 73’s out. Also look for our EMB flying to slowly increase as AE, Horizon and XJT pull out of west coast markets. I’m not saying that I’m happy about it or that SKW is an equal replacement, in a lot of ways we are not (mainly speaking about XJT), but their Co.'s have decided to pull out and for the community we are service and no a/c can do it cheaper than the EMB @ SKW. JMHO, no attacks.

BTW, I was told by Mgmnt that both of our new routes into OR from SFO are profitable with less than 8 people on board and that’s with $4.14/gal gas. Yesterday I hauled 15 up to LMT and 30 out this morning (YES that was 30 adults). I was also told that SBA to SJC is profitable with 5 Pax on board. So the EMB's going nowhere for a very......very long time. Or at least until they find a solid replacement.

Last edited by JetJock16; 07-08-2008 at 06:23 PM.
Reply
Old 07-08-2008 | 07:39 PM
  #39  
TonyWilliams's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,048
Likes: 0
From: Self employed
Default

Originally Posted by JetJock16
So the EMB's going nowhere for a very......very long time. Or at least until they find a solid replacement.

I think we'll have to start cannibalizing planes in the not too distant future. There's a bunch of parts that just aren't readily available for the Bro, those unique propellers being one of them.

Certainly, opportunity is opening up in the west, but I question how long the Bro can effectively do it.
Reply
Old 07-08-2008 | 07:53 PM
  #40  
gsphuntr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: Reverse cowgirl
Default

MX costs on the EMB are starting to outrun their profitability...They will be around for the short term but you can surely count them out in 2-3 years.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
afterburn81
Regional
15
05-29-2008 03:26 PM
HSLD
Regional
26
01-22-2008 06:48 AM
OnMyWay
Regional
3
01-02-2008 07:06 AM
Cessnadriver
Regional
27
11-16-2007 07:10 PM
geshields
Major
2
08-16-2005 03:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices