PDT News and Rumors
08-05-2015, 03:51 PM
#6471
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: forever fo
Posts: 2,413
Originally Posted by billyho
I thought the same thing but why spend millions on millions to start a 145 operator? They could've merged us from the get go.
I'll be long gone by then but a merger of the two wouldn't be a bad thing.
I'll be long gone by then but a merger of the two wouldn't be a bad thing.
Further it stopped all the envoy pilots during all our displacements from going to the dash which will be gone soon. When the musical chairs end, expect the merger. I'd say 18 months.
08-05-2015, 04:13 PM
#6472
Happy at PDT
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Position: EMB-145 CA
Posts: 983
Originally Posted by lakehouse
Because look how many pilots they are recruiting as you "grow"
Further it stopped all the envoy pilots during all our displacements from going to the dash which will be gone soon. When the musical chairs end, expect the merger. I'd say 18 months.
Further it stopped all the envoy pilots during all our displacements from going to the dash which will be gone soon. When the musical chairs end, expect the merger. I'd say 18 months.
08-05-2015, 04:23 PM
#6473
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 439
Originally Posted by Lvlng4Spd
Yeahh because you are just recruiting the sh!t out of people for your 175s. They would be more likely to keep us as factions for 5 years or more. I would fully expect PDT to apply for 175s to be added once the 145s are established...they already tried once...FAA wants to slow our roll a bit. I agree with this baby steps approach.
Tell me, why do you think PDT would "apply" for 175's and why would AAG award them?
08-05-2015, 04:35 PM
#6474
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,450
Originally Posted by sublime259
And I'd imagine the PDT pilots would be more then willing to give a little back on your contract to get those 175's, all in the name of growth!
Tell me, why do you think PDT would "apply" for 175's and why would AAG award them?
Tell me, why do you think PDT would "apply" for 175's and why would AAG award them?
08-05-2015, 04:38 PM
#6475
Happy at PDT
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Position: EMB-145 CA
Posts: 983
Originally Posted by sublime259
And I'd imagine the PDT pilots would be more then willing to give a little back on your contract to get those 175's, all in the name of growth!
Tell me, why do you think PDT would "apply" for 175's and why would AAG award them?
Tell me, why do you think PDT would "apply" for 175's and why would AAG award them?
08-05-2015, 04:42 PM
#6477
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 439
Originally Posted by billyho
Why would you worry??
But to answer your vague question, I'm not worried in the least. Just perplexed. Like you, I'll be long gone by then.
08-05-2015, 04:46 PM
#6478
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 439
Originally Posted by Lvlng4Spd
Don't have to give anything, the provisions for 175a are already in our agreement. Application is an FAA thing...want to see ops with 145s first...then willing to grant 175 approval in a few years. AAG would award as pieces fall into place.
You seem to talk a lot of crap without knowing wth you're talking about.
08-05-2015, 04:47 PM
#6479
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,450
Originally Posted by sublime259
Dude, you gotta start making some sense. I'm trying to understand his rational that AAG would want to put 175's at PDT, when they fought us tooth and nail to try and get an acceptable contract for large RJ's here. That and just what a PDT pilot would do to try and get those 175's all in the name of growth.
But to answer your vague question, I'm not worried in the least. Just perplexed. Like you, I'll be long gone by then.
But to answer your vague question, I'm not worried in the least. Just perplexed. Like you, I'll be long gone by then.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
