Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Mesaba's dispute?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-25-2011 | 09:26 AM
  #41  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,490
Likes: 502
Default

Originally Posted by Bartok
That is the point because that's why you have a problem with this.

If they come back with XJ DOH and keep their longevity for the time they are at 9E, then some will be senior to you, or you wouldn't be crying so much over the furloughs.

That's the deal they were given, get over it.

Our guys are probably just making sure the furloughs are being given the proper treatment as they should.
I'm a 9E '07 guy, so they'll be below me. But that's not the point. It's the principal of the matter. And you say that your guys are "probably just making sure the furloughs are being given the proper treatment as they should." The time for that was *prior* to April 15. After the JCBA was signed and prior to April 15, all 3 groups had negotiations for the SLI. When that didn't come to fruition, we entered negotiated sessions with Bloch. When that didn't work, it finally went to binding arbitration. You mean to tell me that the WHOLE time, this situation was never addressed? That's hard to believe. They topic of XJ furloughees must have come up, and addressed, before April 15. So what's so special now that a dispute was necessary?


Shyguy - I don't know of ANY XJ pilots that didn't take the recall.

I am amazed that you have so much hatred toward fellow pilots who have done nothing wrong to you.

Also, I'm amazed at your lack of knowledge about the whole situation but you seem to think you have it all figured out. Amazing.

You are a disgrace to Pinnacle and ALPA.
If they all have taken it back, then good. Information like that is never communicated to us. They have 60 days to leave, but they are all still here. Honestly, I don't care whether they stay or go. But if lost any more pilots than what we have now, we'd be in a really big staffing crisis. When did that 60-day clock start? And please understand, I don't have hatred towards any group. I hold nothing against XJ pilots or the XJ furloughees. The only thing I'm a little disappointed about is disputing something when the disputing window already closed. We are where we are today due to cards that were dealt to us long ago. I don't have any of this figured out, hence, trying to make sense of it and see what's going on. The only piece of knowledge I do know is that Bloch wanted the MOU. That MOU spelled terms of placing XJ pilots at Pinnacle with longevity credit. It points us in the right direction.
Reply
Old 05-25-2011 | 09:46 AM
  #42  
Bartok's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
From: Up Front
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
I'm a 9E '07 guy, so they'll be below me. But that's not the point. It's the principal of the matter. And you say that your guys are "probably just making sure the furloughs are being given the proper treatment as they should." The time for that was *prior* to April 15. After the JCBA was signed and prior to April 15, all 3 groups had negotiations for the SLI. When that didn't come to fruition, we entered negotiated sessions with Bloch. When that didn't work, it finally went to binding arbitration. You mean to tell me that the WHOLE time, this situation was never addressed? That's hard to believe. They topic of XJ furloughees must have come up, and addressed, before April 15. So what's so special now that a dispute was necessary?



If they all have taken it back, then good. Information like that is never communicated to us. They have 60 days to leave, but they are all still here. Honestly, I don't care whether they stay or go. But if lost any more pilots than what we have now, we'd be in a really big staffing crisis. When did that 60-day clock start? And please understand, I don't have hatred towards any group. I hold nothing against XJ pilots or the XJ furloughees. The only thing I'm a little disappointed about is disputing something when the disputing window already closed. We are where we are today due to cards that were dealt to us long ago. I don't have any of this figured out, hence, trying to make sense of it and see what's going on. The only piece of knowledge I do know is that Bloch wanted the MOU. That MOU spelled terms of placing XJ pilots at Pinnacle with longevity credit. It points us in the right direction.
Taking care of furloughs and making sure they're not thrown under the bus?

I hope they take steps to insure that never happens again.
Reply
Old 05-25-2011 | 10:22 AM
  #43  
usmc-sgt's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,080
Likes: 42
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
Can someone answer this for me: where exactly are the XJ furloughee pilots on a list? The list was a "snapshot" of 1 July. They would be on the bottom of the XJ list

Are they on the Pinnacle list, with their Pinnacle DOH? Or are they on Mesaba's list, all the way at the bottom, listed as furloughees? The latter

This matters. Bloch needs to see. Also, Bloch needs to know (or should know) what the XJ union did in regards to recalling pilots. Did you volunteer to be on the merger committee? You could have told him this yourself.
..........
Reply
Old 05-25-2011 | 10:34 AM
  #44  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: 900/FO
Default

Shyguy you finally broke my 2 1/2 years stint of no response on APC because of your outrageous crap. You know why we got 2nd year pay at pinnacles rates? Because no XJ pilot would take the horrible pay the company offered for first year pay as it was BELOW our old first year pay. 2nd year pay at 9e's old pay rates was barely our old 1st year pay rates. As for the questions for the LOA for us, do everyone a favor and read it, it's in the contract but I will answer the 60 day question. June 4th is the 60 day time limit.
Reply
Old 05-25-2011 | 10:49 AM
  #45  
PropDriver's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
From: In charge of the remote
Default

ShyGuy you really need to educate yourself before you post. The SLI is being done for everyone on property on June 1, 2010. The MOU pilots were on the XJ list on that day and that's where Bloch will see them. Also, the company requires the MOU pilots to stay in their current spot for 60 days after accepting recall. Many of us want to go back to XJ but can't.

The whole reason this is taking so long is that your airline (9E) has so many errors in your seniority list that they have to be fixed before Bloch will issue his decision.
Reply
Old 05-25-2011 | 10:54 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Default

Shyguy, I don't understand where your hatred of the Mesaba furloughs stems from. Sure, they got second or third year pay, vacation and sick time but how does that affect you? Why would you wish for another guy to get worse treatment? Most of the Mesaba furloughs had already been furloughed once before, so they've suffered plenty. As for where they'll fall in the final list, who knows? Who knows where any of us will fall. Are you just mad the list isn't done? We're all mad about that, but wishing for another pilot to lose doesn't exactly follow the golden rule. Not that everybody follows that, but walk a mile in their shoes and you might find some sympathy you're lacking now.
Reply
Old 05-25-2011 | 11:05 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Triggerhappy
Shyguy you finally broke my 2 1/2 years stint of no response on APC because of your outrageous crap. You know why we got 2nd year pay at pinnacles rates? Because no XJ pilot would take the horrible pay the company offered for first year pay as it was BELOW our old first year pay. 2nd year pay at 9e's old pay rates was barely our old 1st year pay rates. As for the questions for the LOA for us, do everyone a favor and read it, it's in the contract but I will answer the 60 day question. June 4th is the 60 day time limit.
1st year pay was still a hell of alot better than what you were making on furlough......or I guess you could have applied to Colgan or Lakes and made even less AND had to give up recall rights.....
Reply
Old 05-25-2011 | 11:19 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by IBPilot
1st year pay was still a hell of alot better than what you were making on furlough......or I guess you could have applied to Colgan or Lakes and made even less AND had to give up recall rights.....
If you had a full time job less than 10.50 an hour you are correct. If a furlough were making anything above 10.50 an hour you are incorrect. It's not that hard to make 14-15 dollars an hour and kill first year pay. The only thing that saves it, is second year pay, or in the case of the 99 contract third year pay.
Reply
Old 05-25-2011 | 11:34 AM
  #49  
The Juice's Avatar
ULTP-Ultra Low Tier Pilot
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,228
Likes: 0
Default


1st year pay was still a hell of alot better than what you were making on furlough......or I guess you could have applied to Colgan or Lakes and made even less AND had to give up recall rights.....
They would have made less at Colgan their first year but since Colgan 2nd year pay was more than your second year pay.....

Get over yourself, seriously.

Chances are you will be furloughed sometime in your career, I hope you are shown the same courtesy.
Reply
Old 05-25-2011 | 11:37 AM
  #50  
SErickson's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: M88B
Default

Originally Posted by BIGRIG
Pncl negotiators asked for the list to be held until Mid June.


Even if there are issues with the list from Corp, why was the Pncl MEC not actively working on getting a complete list together over the last 6 months? How did Erickson and his group not know that someday they would need an accurate list that was up to date? How about a reply from the man himself?
Its impressive that you had the above information posted to this board within 27 minutes of the email that was sent from the PCL merger committee. You must be on XJ's MEC or merger committee yourself. Thank you for your service to the profession.

ALPA does not maintain PCL's or any other carriers seniority list. Its unfortunate that the list provided by management contained errors but that was not the fault of the PCL MEC or Merger Committee. To the best of our knowledge, the errors discovered throughout the certification process had all been rectified. You will not find any PCL pilots apologizing for errors made that were outside of our control.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pinchanickled
Regional
33
12-17-2010 06:58 PM
tflyer70
Regional
6
01-04-2009 06:48 PM
LOW FUEL
Regional
16
11-10-2007 06:47 PM
ToiletDuck
Hangar Talk
20
01-23-2007 08:36 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices