Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Pinnacle TA consequences forSkyWest/Expessjet >

Pinnacle TA consequences forSkyWest/Expessjet

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Pinnacle TA consequences forSkyWest/Expessjet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-2013 | 08:26 PM
  #121  
Farmlover's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 843
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Slats
Well OO ain't 9E... Financials, management, diversified feed ect... Separates us our 2 airlines by a great deal. What happened to you all was your managements fault and you supported their mistakes by making one of your own approving the TA... Thats okay though, we'll welcome some of the 65% that sold themselves down river...
You sir are a tool!! Educate yourself
Reply
Old 01-15-2013 | 08:55 PM
  #122  
Av8rking's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Al Czervik
That's failed logic. PCL contract is a bankruptcy contract..not what you are in. Also, isn't industry standard a combined average from all airlines not just pinnacle? I would doubt pinnacles cuts would bring the average down much.
I guess I feel like Spok then since it is failed logic! You guys and gals have truely lowered the bar to an unsustanable level! We are all screwed! I'm sure the next several posts will try to justify why you voted yes knowing 1400-1600 of you WILL be furloughed. I'm sure those S3CR buddy passes for 2 years will make up for all those pains!
Reply
Old 01-16-2013 | 02:23 AM
  #123  
Captain Tony's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AtlCSIP
Maybe so, but some of us are very concerned that we will, in fact, see an unnecessary concessionary contract form our management, supporting the new pncl TA as the new industry standard.
Originally Posted by Al Czervik
That's failed logic. PCL contract is a bankruptcy contract..not what you are in. Also, isn't industry standard a combined average from all airlines not just pinnacle? I would doubt pinnacles cuts would bring the average down much.
You are wrong. Our management tells us constantly that we must "compete" with the other carriers in our segment not only for the flying we currently do, but new flying. We cannot compete with your new lowball contract without taking concessions ourselves. Your -900 Captains will now top out at $87. Ours top out at $108. Do the math!

And to prove you're wrong, our management has already notified the l-XJT side that they intend to negotiate an "industry standard" CRJ-900 rate. Their contract stipulates binding arbitration on new aircraft rates if expedited negotiations fail. Do you not think an arbitrator will look at your abysmal rates and cram them down our throats?

Thanks for nothing Pinnacle. Thanks for rear ending all of us in the segment of the industry that can least afford it. Thanks for taking food out of my kids mouths just so you can hang on a few months longer. Don't ask me for any favors.
Reply
Old 01-16-2013 | 04:05 AM
  #124  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Tony
You are wrong. Our management tells us constantly that we must "compete" with the other carriers in our segment not only for the flying we currently do, but new flying. We cannot compete with your new lowball contract without taking concessions ourselves. Your -900 Captains will now top out at $87. Ours top out at $108. Do the math!

And to prove you're wrong, our management has already notified the l-XJT side that they intend to negotiate an "industry standard" CRJ-900 rate. Their contract stipulates binding arbitration on new aircraft rates if expedited negotiations fail. Do you not think an arbitrator will look at your abysmal rates and cram them down our throats?

Thanks for nothing Pinnacle. Thanks for rear ending all of us in the segment of the industry that can least afford it. Thanks for taking food out of my kids mouths just so you can hang on a few months longer. Don't ask me for any favors.
Just vote no, when it is your turn and fall on the sword.
Reply
Old 01-16-2013 | 04:16 AM
  #125  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: Auto
Default

Originally Posted by dc10guy
Just vote no, when it is your turn and fall on the sword.
I would vote no. If I were one of the 60% getting furloughed I'd vote "hell no". This job is hardly worth what I make now, much less a massive pay cut. I have a little self respect left. Pinnacle is full of Colgan guys so that explains quite a bit right there. They were used to slumming it. Peanuts for an 18 month upgrade right guys? Are the majors calling you yet?

For whatever reason you got to the new low Pinnacle is at, you're the new lowballers. Never again can any of you complain about Gojets. Gulfstream, Great Lakes or Mesa. $38 per hr max to fly a CRJ 900? You guys are an absolute disgrace! I know 500 hr FO's flying Lear jets making twice as much as you guys. Thanks for lowing the bar a little more for everyone else. You guys are proof this industry is hopeless.
Reply
Old 01-16-2013 | 04:20 AM
  #126  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by GlobeTreker
I would vote no. If I were one of the 60% getting furloughed I'd vote "hell no". This job is hardly worth what I make now, much less a massive pay cut.

For whatever reason you got to the new low Pinnacle is at, you're the new lowballers. Never again can any of you complain about Gojets. Gulfstream, Great Lakes or Mesa. $38 per hr max to fly a CRJ 900? You guys are an absolute disgrace! I know 500 hr FO's flying Lear jets making twice as much as you guys. Thanks for lowing the bar a little more for everyone else.
Sorry, I do not work for PNCL. I just want to see all these tough talking guys fall on the sword for the industry. It is easy to tell someone to do something when it is not happening to you. Also, I am not new to the industry.
Reply
Old 01-16-2013 | 04:33 AM
  #127  
cessna157's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
From: Aeroplanes
Default

Many are making a good point here, those opposed aren't keeping an open mind. If I was in the bottom 60%, and I knew that my job would be eliminated, albeit it in 4 months or 4 years, I would have voted no. I realize the ramifications of voting no, I'd be on the street sooner. But I would prevent a precedence from being set, a precedence that would follow me to my next job.

Very real ramifactions of each vote:
No: Out of a job in 12 months due to accelerated aircraft returns. Move to a lateral job with an industry standard/leading contract in 8-15 months.

Yes: Out of a lower-paying job in 30 months due to announced aircraft returns. Furlough, search for a job, but due to majors renegotiating RFP rates, hiring has stalled due to uncertainty.

(I realize this may be extreme and worst case scenario, I think many would say it is a very real possibility)

And before the flame baits start, let me say that I personally made a lateral move and took a 4 year pay cut/reset voluntarily. So I can speak with some authority here.
Reply
Old 01-16-2013 | 04:43 AM
  #128  
supersix-4's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
From: Reserve on tha Beach
Default

Here is my two cents. It will be a long while before anything gets put to a vote @ XJT. Let's say a year (wag) By then Pinnacle's deal will be forgotten and XJT will be scrambling to fill vacancies. Also a year is a good enough time to see if pcl will even still be here. Even with this crappy contract they still have the same management that put them where they are.
Reply
Old 01-16-2013 | 04:47 AM
  #129  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: Auto
Default

Originally Posted by supersix-4
Here is my two cents. It will be a long while before anything gets put to a vote @ XJT. Let's say a year (wag) By then Pinnacle's deal will be forgotten and XJT will be scrambling to fill vacancies. Also a year is a good enough time to see if pcl will even still be here. Even with this crappy contract they still have the same management that put them where they are.
For the sake of the industry, I hope not. These guys don't mind tossing everyone else under the bus. I don't mind seeing them disappear.
Reply
Old 01-16-2013 | 04:51 AM
  #130  
Diesel450's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 234
Likes: 0
From: CORP
Default

Originally Posted by GlobeTreker
I would vote no. If I were one of the 60% getting furloughed I'd vote "hell no". This job is hardly worth what I make now, much less a massive pay cut. I have a little self respect left. Pinnacle is full of Colgan guys so that explains quite a bit right there. They were used to slumming it. Peanuts for an 18 month upgrade right guys? Are the majors calling you yet?

For whatever reason you got to the new low Pinnacle is at, you're the new lowballers. Never again can any of you complain about Gojets. Gulfstream, Great Lakes or Mesa. $38 per hr max to fly a CRJ 900? You guys are an absolute disgrace! I know 500 hr FO's flying Lear jets making twice as much as you guys. Thanks for lowing the bar a little more for everyone else. You guys are proof this industry is hopeless.
So if you were being offered $3000 as "signing bonus" and three months pay if you get furloughed this year.

(75x33.10)*3 = $7447.50 + $3000 = $10447.50
@ Year 2 Pay

As someone less than 40 from the bottom of 2300, what did I have to lose if I vote no, $10,447.50, before taxes. If I am going to lose my job anyways, and have little chance of making it back anytime soon, why would I leave 10 grand on the table. That could make a huge difference when unemployed. Yeah my vote was bought, sh*t happens in this industry, you will change your mind WHEN the time comes. Ill take my money and figure out something else, take the money and finish up my masters when I'm on unemployment.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Past V1
Regional
30
12-22-2012 04:57 PM
SmitteyB
Regional
31
08-10-2012 05:29 PM
OKLATEX
Cargo
3
04-03-2012 03:07 PM
usmc-sgt
Regional
44
03-11-2012 02:04 PM
Windsor
Regional
108
02-04-2009 07:11 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices