Wheels falling off at RAH

Reply Subscribe

Page 3 of 196

103

Last »

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

05-10-2015 | 06:02 PM

#21

LostInPA

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Sep 2009

Posts: 425

Likes: 0

From: B737 F/O

Quote:

Originally Posted by Humblepielot

Whatever helps you sleep at night.

+1. The poster you are responding to has obviously not been watching DCI performance too closely. Not worth my time explaining it to him or her, either.

05-10-2015 | 06:07 PM

#22

Whatmeworry

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Mar 2015

Posts: 203

Likes: 0

If RAH would meet the pilot 60% of the way the company would be on a position to do better. 1500 rule will not go anywhere!! The companies need to pay more!!!

05-10-2015 | 06:24 PM

#23

404yxl

Banned

Joined: Jan 2015

Posts: 988

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lvlng4Spd

More like a 50% probability. People with multiple initial and 121 ride failures are still being hired and are operating aircraft on a daily basis. Rules on commuting? Nope.

There is no chance the captain and the first officer would have been flying that flight together with ATP minimums and all the other rules in place.

As for rules on commuting? Are you going to make everyone live within 1 mile of the airport? What are you going to do to those that take 3 hours in traffic to drive 20 miles to the airport?

05-10-2015 | 06:29 PM

#24

Grumpyaviator

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Nov 2012

Posts: 2,030

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by SayAlt

So will Sully Sullenberger and Jeff Skiles, who have proven to be eloquent, outstanding advocates for both safety as well as our profession.

Quoting Sen. Charles Schumer during the recent congressional subcommittee hearing on lowering ATP standards, to Mzzzzzz. Black (representing the RAA):

"No disrespect, but we're going to go with the 20,000 hour pilot's opinion!"
.

Hearing FAA Reauthorization Airline Safety | Video | C-SPAN.org

http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/re...ml#post1873132

Sully, Skiles and Schumer are all self-serving. But the1500hr rule will not change until 3407 is distant enough in the past to no longer be a political tool, basically when there are enough cancellations to anger enough passengers to the point of complaining to congress.

But the fact is that the 1500 hour rule has increased safety. The caliber of pilot we are seeing on IOE is way less than when there were 300 university pilots. Once the schools catch up and those pilots hit the restricted ATP mins in enough numbers, quality will go up.

05-10-2015 | 06:30 PM

#25

tothebigblue

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Dec 2014

Posts: 362

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by Whatmeworry

If RAH would meet the pilot 60% of the way the company would be on a position to do better. 1500 rule will not go anywhere!! The companies need to pay more!!!

abatmanret14h.jpg

companies like RAH need to just go away....

05-10-2015 | 06:34 PM

#26

magnus0322

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Apr 2011

Posts: 729

Likes: 0

From: ERJ 170

RAH and BB are reaping what they sow. God Bless.

05-10-2015 | 06:37 PM

#27

Grumpyaviator

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Nov 2012

Posts: 2,030

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by tothebigblue

Attachment 2059

companies like RAH need to just go away....

Yes, we'd be much better with companies that go for the empty flow-through/ guaranteed interview promises and sign concessionary contracts during a pilot shortage, selling out those that have held out for better.

05-10-2015 | 06:38 PM

#28

SayAlt

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Oct 2014

Posts: 1,537

Likes: 0

From: Downward-Facing Dog Pose

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grumpyaviator

Sully, Skiles and Schumer are all self-serving.

So was your post, Grumpy.

05-10-2015 | 06:43 PM

#29

CaptOveur

On Reserve

Joined: Mar 2015

Posts: 67

Likes: 0

Where did the RAH thread go from a year ago? Deleted?

05-10-2015 | 06:58 PM

#30

Grumpyaviator

Gets Weekends Off

Joined: Nov 2012

Posts: 2,030

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by SayAlt

So was your post, Grumpy.

Sully and Skiles don't care about safety, they care about scope. They're exploiting 3407 and exaggerating the situation at the regionals to make it look like regionals are not safe so airlines will be pressured to move flying back to mainline. Their agenda during 1549 congressional testimony was transparent and obvious, and they used their notoriety to try to influence scope under the guise of safety.

I support moving all branded flying to mainline, I don't support exploiting tragedy and lying about the regionals to do it.