Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Wheels falling off at RAH >

Wheels falling off at RAH

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Wheels falling off at RAH

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-10-2015 | 09:32 PM
  #41  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Grumpyaviator
Sully and Skiles don't care about safety, they care about scope. They're exploiting 3407 and exaggerating the situation at the regionals to make it look like regionals are not safe so airlines will be pressured to move flying back to mainline. Their agenda during 1549 congressional testimony was transparent and obvious, and they used their notoriety to try to influence scope under the guise of safety.

I support moving all branded flying to mainline, I don't support exploiting tragedy and lying about the regionals to do it.
They are 100% correct. Creating a sub-group of contractors flying under brand name has created a second tier in safety.
Reply
Old 05-10-2015 | 09:41 PM
  #42  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by mpet
Even if the 1500 rule goes away that's not going to do a damn thing to supply more pilots. The 1500 rule went into effect in 2013... the number of kids wanting to get into this profession was dismal long before that. Obviously I'm a huge proponent of the 1500hr rule but I'm just saying... at UND we're already stretched on instructors and that's with tons of people sticking around to 1000. If people were in and out of here any faster there would be literally nobody left to instruct or at least the capacity of students would go way down. That's not just bad for producing more American pilots but that would also put lots of strain on foreign carriers who train here as well.
Because the regionals waited too long to raise compensation for their pilots and now that the retirements are happening, they have put themselves in a corner they will not be able to get out of.

If they raised compensation across the board to attract new people to become pilots, it would take at least 3 years for those new pilots to get through the system.

An interesting quandary for sure.
Reply
Old 05-10-2015 | 09:46 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,537
Likes: 0
From: Downward-Facing Dog Pose
Default

Originally Posted by 404yxl
They are 100% correct. Creating a sub-group of contractors flying under brand name has created a second tier in safety.
I was going to respond to Grumpy's post, but decided his opinion here wasn't worth the trouble. He comes across as far more jealous of Sully than objectively critical.
Reply
Old 05-10-2015 | 10:21 PM
  #44  
deltajuliet's Avatar
Living the Dream
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
Default

Delta has pay rates for the CRJ-900. They start at $70/hour for a first year FO. $70 per hour. That's 300% what the same pilot will make at a regional. It's infuriating to think how the difference goes to a regional's overhead and its CEO's pockets. Get rid of all that. I hope Republic fails and I hope all the regionals fail. The only reason they exist was because legacy pilots were too proud to fly small planes. Ironically, regionals now fly aircraft sizably comparable to a DC-9, and their routes are anything but "regional." What a twisted industry situation to inherit. Thanks ALPA, thanks old legacy pilots.

What would it cost United or Delta or American to bring regional flying in-house? Would their pilots go for it? It seems like they hate the idea of giving a seniority number to anyone they don't have to, but if the only way Republic or the regional industry can staff their aircraft is by raising pay significantly, at what point does it become more cost effective to cut the middle man and bring the flying back in-house?
Reply
Old 05-11-2015 | 02:36 AM
  #45  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: C172 Left Seat
Default

What if the mainline carriers moved regional jet flying back home but placed a seat/equipment lock on all newly minted ATPs for a set amount of time?
Reply
Old 05-11-2015 | 03:11 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,648
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by citation35hf
No, other airlines are covering our flying, we can't staff our own flying. We have no reserves. Meanwhile management thinks everything is rosy on Purdue RD.
These morons are running this ship fullspeed towards an iceberg.
DONT COME HERE
Not true, Endeavor is now doing several Delta shuttle flights to DC and Ord because ****tle can't do them
Reply
Old 05-11-2015 | 04:18 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Default

Gonna play devils advocate here...So, we (RAH) need a new contract to attract new hires so we can staff our flying, right? Let's look at the timeline here.

2 weeks+ for finishing negotiations (haven't even touched the "big 3" articles yet)
2-3 weeks for a vote
1 month to attract/interview anyone who might take the bait
2-3 months to train, including IOE

You're looking at 4-5 months before we even get the bodies we need in the seats flying the airplanes. And that's just for current staffing. How about when our 9 new DL175s start showing up this Fall? Or our 75 UA175s?...Half my flights cancel 2-3 days before hand. What's the point in even holding a line...Everyone saying this place is headed for an iceberg? It already hit it. It's a sinking ship. Jump on a lifeboat while you still can people. Mine's leaving next week.
Reply
Old 05-11-2015 | 04:29 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,545
Likes: 285
Default

The next bandaid fix is raising the retirement age to 68. It will happen within the next 2 years.
Reply
Old 05-11-2015 | 04:35 AM
  #49  
block30's Avatar
Bracing for Fallacies
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 3,543
Likes: 0
From: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Default

Originally Posted by mpet
Even if the 1500 rule goes away that's not going to do a damn thing to supply more pilots. The 1500 rule went into effect in 2013... the number of kids wanting to get into this profession was dismal long before that. Obviously I'm a huge proponent of the 1500hr rule but I'm just saying... at UND we're already stretched on instructors and that's with tons of people sticking around to 1000. If people were in and out of here any faster there would be literally nobody left to instruct or at least the capacity of students would go way down. That's not just bad for producing more American pilots but that would also put lots of strain on foreign carriers who train here as well.
Yes, this has been my point as well; if we go back to the old rule of 250 hours or there about, nobody will flight instruct, thus creating another constriction on the pilot supply. I'm sure management would jump all over the two months of reprieve they'd get though.

Originally Posted by mpet
Of course, regionals acted like increasing the age to 65 wasn't just a bandaid fix to the larger problem. They had every chance to prepare for this and they didn't. Unfortunately it doesn't seem like management even cares. They just want another bandaid, rescind the new ATP requirements. I'm starting class soon to build my 121 experience in the hopes that by 2018 the regionals are basically dying/dead. Good riddance imho.
Agree with you again...I love listening to management types whine before congress how unfair the situation is...as if they didn't see this coming-and weren't warned very, very vociferously for *decades* leading up.

Originally Posted by sandrich
Gonna play devils advocate here...So, we (RAH) need a new contract to attract new hires so we can staff our flying, right? Let's look at the timeline here.

2 weeks+ for finishing negotiations (haven't even touched the "big 3" articles yet)
2-3 weeks for a vote
1 month to attract/interview anyone who might take the bait
2-3 months to train, including IOE

You're looking at 4-5 months before we even get the bodies we need in the seats flying the airplanes. And that's just for current staffing. How about when our 9 new DL175s start showing up this Fall? Or our 75 UA175s?...Half my flights cancel 2-3 days before hand. What's the point in even holding a line...Everyone saying this place is headed for an iceberg? It already hit it. It's a sinking ship. Jump on a lifeboat while you still can people. Mine's leaving next week.
Where ya going? A major, LCC, regional, or maybe corporate/fractional? Good luck all RAHers.
Reply
Old 05-11-2015 | 05:01 AM
  #50  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 928
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by citation35hf
No, other airlines are covering our flying, we can't staff our own flying. We have no reserves. Meanwhile management thinks everything is rosy on Purdue RD.
These morons are running this ship fullspeed towards an iceberg.
DONT COME HERE
Originally Posted by gojo
Not true, Endeavor is now doing several Delta shuttle flights to DC and Ord because ****tle can't do them
Pay attention to the comma after the word "No." It means something.

Last edited by sqwkvfr; 05-11-2015 at 05:18 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
zacaviator
Career Questions
17
03-11-2015 01:30 PM
Chuck D
Regional
32
04-10-2014 08:04 AM
buffmike80
Major
117
07-14-2009 01:12 PM
250 or point 65
Regional
15
09-10-2008 06:17 AM
KiloAlpha
Regional
52
04-02-2007 07:55 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices