Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Wheels falling off at RAH >

Wheels falling off at RAH

Search
Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Wheels falling off at RAH

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-04-2015, 09:28 AM
  #531  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
Default

Having a good or great contract obviously helps address your needs and maybe will keep current pilots from leaving.

But isn't the real question how to attract new talent to RAH? I would hypothesize that a new contract, which will be industry standard at best, does nothing to get new people in the door which is desperately needed to keep RAH from shrinking.
FirstClass is offline  
Old 06-04-2015, 09:45 AM
  #532  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 516
Default

Originally Posted by FirstClass View Post
Having a good or great contract obviously helps address your needs and maybe will keep current pilots from leaving.

But isn't the real question how to attract new talent to RAH? I would hypothesize that a new contract, which will be industry standard at best, does nothing to get new people in the door which is desperately needed to keep RAH from shrinking.
I think the company has realized this, which is why they're now slowing the pace of negotiations. The most a new contract would do is keep junior FOs from bailing.

They think they will be able to staff via signing bonuses ($12K is a lot for a young CFI with flight training loans), pouring more resources into recruitment, touting their bases (live in Miami and er...Pittsburgh!), and using the "employee engagement" tactics to sway people on the fence to keep chasing the carrot that's tied to the moving stick. Have some free baseball tickets!

BB has drawn his line in the sand thru his speeches- he wants junior manning in this contract. And not surprisingly, that's one of the Articles the Company has stopped negotiating on- the "Days Off" one.

There's no way this pilot group will ever agree to JM. They would rather continue with the old contract. So, impasse.
morerightrudder is offline  
Old 06-04-2015, 10:06 AM
  #533  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
Default

Originally Posted by morerightrudder View Post
I think the company has realized this, which is why they're now slowing the pace of negotiations. The most a new contract would do is keep junior FOs from bailing.

They think they will be able to staff via signing bonuses ($12K is a lot for a young CFI with flight training loans), pouring more resources into recruitment, touting their bases (live in Miami and er...Pittsburgh!), and using the "employee engagement" tactics to sway people on the fence to keep chasing the carrot that's tied to the moving stick. Have some free baseball tickets!

BB has drawn his line in the sand thru his speeches- he wants junior manning in this contract. And not surprisingly, that's one of the Articles the Company has stopped negotiating on- the "Days Off" one.

There's no way this pilot group will ever agree to JM. They would rather continue with the old contract. So, impasse.
It very well might be best to continue on the current contract instead of inviting junior manning in. I know of really nothing that I would trade for it, I mean it would truly have to be industry leading, and something not open to interpretation.

Let the company figure out recruitment.

On the plus side I believe Republic pilots will be the first to be absorbed by major airlines. Without flow and being wholly owned, there is nothing to stop mainlines from absorbing your entire group as quickly as they see fit to do so.

On the minus side, although it may seem hard to believe, Republic could be the first to fail. When the hiring really picks up in the next few years, I predict all regionals will eventually fail, but Republic may be one of the first. Hopefully though wholly owned carriers do not become a new rung on the ladder on the path to getting to the majors.
FirstClass is offline  
Old 06-04-2015, 11:25 AM
  #534  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Posts: 25
Default

The lack of junior manning was the biggest selling point offered by our recruiter at my interview. That's one of the most important positives of this place, as opposed to all of the negatives.

If they want to implement it.. they're going to have to pay dearly, and accept serious restrictions. Nobody will work here if the company gets unlimited, cheap, outstation based junior manning. Combined with anything less than leg-by-leg 100% cancellation pay and RJET will be toast.
Final Fix is offline  
Old 06-04-2015, 12:32 PM
  #535  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: 6 Train - Panhandler
Posts: 2,001
Default

Originally Posted by FirstClass View Post
Having a good or great contract obviously helps address your needs and maybe will keep current pilots from leaving.

But isn't the real question how to attract new talent to RAH? I would hypothesize that a new contract, which will be industry standard at best, does nothing to get new people in the door which is desperately needed to keep RAH from shrinking.
Hear, hear! Wonder which one of these outfits will be the first to be given a fair deal by their legacy bosses. When that happens, I do believe that many, many RAH FOs will be the first to bail, and no mistake.
TalkTurkey is offline  
Old 06-04-2015, 12:49 PM
  #536  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
Default

Originally Posted by TalkTurkey View Post
Hear, hear! Wonder which one of these outfits will be the first to be given a fair deal by their legacy bosses. When that happens, I do believe that many, many RAH FOs will be the first to bail, and no mistake.
I suspect the FO's that do bail probably see working for a wholly owned as a necessary and new rung up the ladder.
FirstClass is offline  
Old 06-04-2015, 09:41 PM
  #537  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DSRoss996's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: 737
Posts: 165
Default

As for the whole "junior manning" argument. Why would outstation lifers care? All their trips end at 0020 in base, what could they possibly "junior man" them to?

That being said, junior manning sucks. I had it at my last airline. But "negotiating" involves just what that word means. Negotiating is not a list of demands. Give some, take some. Junior manning is not a deal breaker if the rest of the alleged TA contains significant improvements.
DSRoss996 is offline  
Old 06-05-2015, 05:19 AM
  #538  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
Default

Originally Posted by DSRoss996 View Post
As for the whole "junior manning" argument. Why would outstation lifers care? All their trips end at 0020 in base, what could they possibly "junior man" them to?

That being said, junior manning sucks. I had it at my last airline. But "negotiating" involves just what that word means. Negotiating is not a list of demands. Give some, take some. Junior manning is not a deal breaker if the rest of the alleged TA contains significant improvements.
Junior manning would be an every day reality for you as you struggle to hire.
FirstClass is offline  
Old 06-05-2015, 07:31 PM
  #539  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 183
Default

Sounds like the company has decided to ride the storm out! After reading both the company and IBT updates I think BBs plan is to maintain his current profit margins and try to survive the next year. The bean counters have no intention of giving this pilot group anything close to a industry leading contract. Also I heard from a very reliable source RAH is gathering data to overturn certain restrictions from the 1500 hour rule. The company has a team working with several aviation universities to obtain the data. Of course this will not help to save this company, but it's cheaper than a new CBA.
FEtoFO is offline  
Old 06-05-2015, 08:22 PM
  #540  
On Reserve
 
Dags's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Posts: 23
Default

Junior manning would be really hard to sell...we've held it off this long.

If the latest corpcomm is worth anything, let's wait and see what happens in the next two weeks. Everyone should go to their respective base visit at the least, and more. IBT has proven they can (will?) only do so much. And that's not exactly a slight to the 357. Had high hopes for April, but let's see if they (management) can put tires to asphalt and TA the rest.

As for it going under, there's obviously the high chance that it'll be the first to go down not being wholly owned. The size of the operation is what the trouble is. Want to talk about lateral movement? Imagine what'll happen if DAL or one of the others call for breaking a contract and the ship sinks....you'll have near 3,000 pilots hitting the market. No helping it at that point.

Of course as the saying goes.... I'll believe it when my a** is seated and we're taking off, and that goes either way. Good luck to all those getting out and moving up, there's more and more every day.
Dags is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
zacaviator
Career Questions
17
03-11-2015 01:30 PM
Chuck D
Regional
32
04-10-2014 08:04 AM
buffmike80
Major
117
07-14-2009 01:12 PM
250 or point 65
Regional
15
09-10-2008 06:17 AM
KiloAlpha
Regional
52
04-02-2007 07:55 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices