Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Crj or Erj

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-26-2007, 04:16 PM
  #31  
CA
 
CL65driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: I am the Captain now...
Posts: 1,006
Default

I'll agree with you, POPA. That stupid yoke in the ERJ is a real POS!
CL65driver is offline  
Old 02-26-2007, 04:23 PM
  #32  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
Default

Originally Posted by CL65driver
Groove, I'll be the first to admit that the ERJ has a major problem with it's landing structural weight. But if you've got a creative crew, you can usually find a way around it.

But at the end of the day, they both suck monkey butt.
Well thats why you need to have an XR
JoeyMeatballs is offline  
Old 02-26-2007, 06:30 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 7ER B...whatever that means.
Posts: 3,967
Default

Originally Posted by POPA
As somebody who's only flown the ERJ, I'm going to go ahead and say I prefer the CRJ. Why? It has a real yoke! There's a reason that 99% (no, I'm not sure that's the actual number) of the world's airlines don't have a freakin' ram's-horn.
I actually find the ram horns to be fairly comfortable to fly with. A little weird at first but after a few hundred hours I don't know if i could go back to a normal yoke.

Originally Posted by POPA
As far as ERJs being underpowered, I certainly won't say they're comparable to a 777. However, it's really easy to overspeed an LR when you're at cruise power, at any altitude.
Tell me that again when you're in the mid to high 20s, heavy and its ISA +10. In the teens and 30s I will agree with you, better get out of the detent.
freezingflyboy is offline  
Old 02-26-2007, 06:32 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,857
Default

Originally Posted by freezingflyboy
I actually find the ram horns to be fairly comfortable to fly with. A little weird at first but after a few hundred hours I don't know if i could go back to a normal yoke.
After a few hundred hours with the motorcycle grips, I KNOW I could go back to a normal yoke - or even better, a stick
POPA is offline  
Old 02-26-2007, 07:12 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Posts: 3,732
Default

Originally Posted by CL65driver
I'll agree with you, POPA. That stupid yoke in the ERJ is a real POS!
I like it for TO and cliimb. Suck balls on landing, especially in a crosswind.
dojetdriver is offline  
Old 02-26-2007, 08:23 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 193
Default

Ditto the ERJ yoke comments. I cannot stand it!
Nightsky is offline  
Old 02-27-2007, 09:33 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Foxcow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 464
Default

I like having jet performance in the EMB above FL200. We can get 1300+ fpm through FL300 at a moderately heavy weight.

The CRJ is slightly quieter and slightly quieter in the back though. I prefer the EMB
Foxcow is offline  
Old 02-27-2007, 09:39 AM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
groovinaviator's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: CL65 Captain
Posts: 484
Default Sissy Horns

Originally Posted by Nightsky
Ditto the ERJ yoke comments. I cannot stand it!
The Hawker 800 had the same "sissy horn" yoke as we called it... I never had a problem with it.

Someone seroiusly needs to hang little pon-poms off it like they did on their bike when they were a little girl... that would be way classy!
groovinaviator is offline  
Old 02-27-2007, 09:53 AM
  #39  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
Default

Originally Posted by groovinaviator
The Hawker 800 had the same "sissy horn" yoke as we called it... I never had a problem with it.

Someone seroiusly needs to hang little pon-poms off it like they did on their bike when they were a little girl... that would be way classy!
thats kinda funny
JoeyMeatballs is offline  
Old 02-27-2007, 10:12 AM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
saab2000's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,750
Default

The CRJ-200 sucks. IMHO.

But the cockpit is reasonably spacious for such a small airplane. Also, I agree that it seems like fairly sturdy construction.

I think the CRJ-700 is a far nicer airplane and they could have made it even better, but that would have cost more money.

What I don't like about the CRJ-200:

-Feels unstable to me (but not to everyone else I guess...)
-Dead zone at the yoke-centered position
-Underpowered
-Not initially designed for pax service - things break more often than they should

What I like:
-Not bad cockpit space, especially room for the pilot case
-Very good brakes! (RWY 35 or 26 in PHL anyone?)
-Can go fast. Sometimes.
-It's an airplane and I get paid to fly it!!
saab2000 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
avi8tor4life
Regional
72
07-12-2009 10:40 PM
xjtr
Regional
14
01-15-2007 11:10 AM
exerauflyboy5
Regional
39
10-27-2006 10:43 PM
ezvictor
Regional
10
10-23-2006 12:48 PM
ThreeGreens
Regional
9
08-23-2006 04:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices