Crj or Erj
#32
Banned
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
Well thats why you need to have an XR
#33
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 7ER B...whatever that means.
Posts: 3,967
Tell me that again when you're in the mid to high 20s, heavy and its ISA +10. In the teens and 30s I will agree with you, better get out of the detent.
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,857
After a few hundred hours with the motorcycle grips, I KNOW I could go back to a normal yoke - or even better, a stick
#35
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Posts: 3,732
#38
Sissy Horns
The Hawker 800 had the same "sissy horn" yoke as we called it... I never had a problem with it.
Someone seroiusly needs to hang little pon-poms off it like they did on their bike when they were a little girl... that would be way classy!
Someone seroiusly needs to hang little pon-poms off it like they did on their bike when they were a little girl... that would be way classy!
#39
Banned
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
#40
The CRJ-200 sucks. IMHO.
But the cockpit is reasonably spacious for such a small airplane. Also, I agree that it seems like fairly sturdy construction.
I think the CRJ-700 is a far nicer airplane and they could have made it even better, but that would have cost more money.
What I don't like about the CRJ-200:
-Feels unstable to me (but not to everyone else I guess...)
-Dead zone at the yoke-centered position
-Underpowered
-Not initially designed for pax service - things break more often than they should
What I like:
-Not bad cockpit space, especially room for the pilot case
-Very good brakes! (RWY 35 or 26 in PHL anyone?)
-Can go fast. Sometimes.
-It's an airplane and I get paid to fly it!!
But the cockpit is reasonably spacious for such a small airplane. Also, I agree that it seems like fairly sturdy construction.
I think the CRJ-700 is a far nicer airplane and they could have made it even better, but that would have cost more money.
What I don't like about the CRJ-200:
-Feels unstable to me (but not to everyone else I guess...)
-Dead zone at the yoke-centered position
-Underpowered
-Not initially designed for pax service - things break more often than they should
What I like:
-Not bad cockpit space, especially room for the pilot case
-Very good brakes! (RWY 35 or 26 in PHL anyone?)
-Can go fast. Sometimes.
-It's an airplane and I get paid to fly it!!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post