Crj or Erj
#61
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 20
From: 7ER B...whatever that means.
#62
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 20
From: 7ER B...whatever that means.
The only time I've ever had a captain start the engines is if I'm busy with something else...
Do you have trouble operating the spring loaded plastic guard or something? I know they can be tricky, but c'mon
The thrust levers have an idle detent, its called the stop. The only way to get 'em further back is to deploy the reversers. The shutoff detent is in the same place. Engines won't shutoff unless the thrust levers are at the idle stop.
They just replaced the buttons with a knob. Oh forgot, the knobs trip you up.
What do you have against letting the FADEC introduce or stop the fuel? I always felt like some retarded yoga student trying to start the CRJ engines.
To each his own. I prefer the ease of use of the ERJ vs the CRJ, the automatic anti-ice (no more worrying about blowing the engine plugs), the automatic engine starts, etc.
I don't like the starter being a knob with a spring loaded plastic guard. I don't like the TLs having to be in the idle position with no idle detent, or better yet a shutoff detent.
The thrust levers have an idle detent, its called the stop. The only way to get 'em further back is to deploy the reversers. The shutoff detent is in the same place. Engines won't shutoff unless the thrust levers are at the idle stop.
I did like a start pushbutton, and a stop pushbutton. I liked TLs that you advanced out of the shutoff position to introduce fuel. Or returned to shutoff to stop fuel.
What do you have against letting the FADEC introduce or stop the fuel? I always felt like some retarded yoga student trying to start the CRJ engines.
Nothing wrong with the ERJs staring procedure. I just liked the CRJs better.
#63
Robthree, I don't know about you- but I love the FADEC system in the ERJ. I'm not too fond of screaming down the runway at 70 knots, trying to match the N1s to the carats. And as for the engine start- gotta love that too. It's fool-proof in the ERJ.
Oh well, to all their own.
Oh well, to all their own.
#64
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Robthree, I don't know about you- but I love the FADEC system in the ERJ. I'm not too fond of screaming down the runway at 70 knots, trying to match the N1s to the carats. And as for the engine start- gotta love that too. It's fool-proof in the ERJ.
Oh well, to all their own.
Oh well, to all their own.
#66
Thats if you use FLC in the ERJ. 8-10 (weight dependent) degrees up below from 1500'-10000' and 3-5 (again weight dependent) degrees up from 10000'-FL300 and then 1000fpm to altitude. Above 10000', 270-290kts in the climb is standard.
#67
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
#68
I'll only use FLC below 10k on a climb, in a descent flight idle and -1800 fpm will usually yield about 240. Above 10k, I only use FLC in an XR, in everything else I use VS mode or SPD in smooth air only to stick to the profile.
#69
Mr. FADEC is a beautiful thing though!
#70
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
From: Former EMB 120 Jr. Water Boy, CRJ newbee
How is the the weight restrictions with both jets? It seams that the ERJ 140/45 has more problems with wt restrictions than the CRJ? I also remember someone saying previously (Prob SAAB) the 145XR doesn't have many of the restrictions that the other have. Too me, when I worked at Eagle, throwing bags, the crews were always dealing with restrictions. I recently flew out of SLC on a CRJ to DEN. We were full with 50, 3 crew members, and a jumpseater as well. I can't ever remember seeing a ERJ being able to do that in my Eagle days no matter what time of year it was. The DBQ-ORD flight was 28 min so their fuel loads weren't outrageous, even in wx and gnd holds which is everyday life in Chicago. Correct me if I am wrong please!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



