Crj or Erj
02-27-2007 | 11:04 AM
#41
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
From: Former EMB 120 Jr. Water Boy, CRJ newbee
B000AO7M4I.01-A2TE9IQP68MWQU._SS500_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg
Any takers? You can buy these on Amazon!
02-27-2007 | 03:31 PM
#43
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
what about the climb performance? How many step climbs does the CRJ have to do to reach FL300 and above? I know we don't have to do any in the ERJ all the way to 370. From talking to others that fly the CRJ it seems they generally cruise at lower altitudes for this reason. I've never flown the CRJ but it seems like it would get annoying to have to level off 2 or 3 times to get through FL300. That cockpit is nice and quiet though 
02-27-2007 | 05:21 PM
#44
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
what about the climb performance? How many step climbs does the CRJ have to do to reach FL300 and above? I know we don't have to do any in the ERJ all the way to 370. From talking to others that fly the CRJ it seems they generally cruise at lower altitudes for this reason. I've never flown the CRJ but it seems like it would get annoying to have to level off 2 or 3 times to get through FL300. That cockpit is nice and quiet though
02-27-2007 | 06:17 PM
#45
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Not talking about the plane, talking about the rams horn. Probably wouldn't matter which aircraft, just plain sucks in a x-wind. The dorknob was a bear, high wing, T-tail, narrow gear. Thank god it had a yoke.
On another subject, was in an XR today coming from the east coast to IAH. Mid 30's, in the detent, ISA -4. .77 was the fastest it would go.
On another subject, was in an XR today coming from the east coast to IAH. Mid 30's, in the detent, ISA -4. .77 was the fastest it would go.
02-27-2007 | 06:37 PM
#46
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 20
From: 7ER B...whatever that means.
02-27-2007 | 07:00 PM
#47
Banned
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,929
Likes: 0
From: A-320
Not talking about the plane, talking about the rams horn. Probably wouldn't matter which aircraft, just plain sucks in a x-wind. The dorknob was a bear, high wing, T-tail, narrow gear. Thank god it had a yoke.
On another subject, was in an XR today coming from the east coast to IAH. Mid 30's, in the detent, ISA -4. .77 was the fastest it would go.
On another subject, was in an XR today coming from the east coast to IAH. Mid 30's, in the detent, ISA -4. .77 was the fastest it would go.
02-27-2007 | 07:02 PM
#48
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Flying between ORD and RIC this morning at 370, I had to pull the go-levers back from the detent (at CRZ setting) to keep from overspeeding the LR. Are you remembering to put your gear up after you take off?
02-27-2007 | 07:14 PM
#49
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Seriously, it wouldn't go any faster. Maybe it had tired engines.
02-27-2007 | 07:18 PM
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Yep, but having a wide set of handle bars with a low pivot point hitting your knee vs. a narrow conventional yoke that you can easily get full deflection if necessary is not "an airplane is an aiplane thing".
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
