Ok, so all we have is rumors at this point. BUT, the rumors we do have are all negative. Well, to most of us they're negative. Maybe giving up 5% of PS for 5% of pay and adding 2% on top of that is fine for some, but I think MOST of us can agree that in this environment (i.e. with the multiple BILLIONS in profit the company is making and the increased number of BILLIONS in profit the company is expected to make) that something more is needed in this TA, right?
So riddle me this: Who in the HE double hockey sticks can put up any kind of defense for such horse squeeze? I mean, who are these APC members and where did they come from? About all that is justifiable in a sane world is for an APCer who doesn't want to buy into the notion that there might be more truth to the (very likely) rumor of a turd coming in this TA to say, "Hey, I'm not willing to say no until I see what's in it." Other than that or, "I heard it was not as bad as the rest of you seem to think." But any talk like "Are you willing to wait 3 years if it's turned down." or the like is unbelievable. Seriously? That just boggles the mind. Apparently this kind of individual would take 4/1/1/1 with 4% given back in PS and concessions in sick leave, scope, and LCA OE bumps.
Again, who are these APCers and are they even part of our pilot group?