Details on Delta TA
#6011
This is what I sent to my reps:
I'm sure you guys have already gotten an earful to vote NO on this TA, and I want you to count me in that camp as well. Concessions of any kind in this environment are unacceptable to me - especially in areas where our survey said the negotiators were not to touch. For me, if scope is not strengthened, it must be an automatic NO regardless of what's in the rest of it. Scope concessions of any kind are unacceptable.
More importantly however, you need to send this back for the sake of our reps' role in our union. This top-down governance has to stop. Sending back a concessionary TA that didn't follow the will of our survey, is exactly what's needed to remind this administration who runs this union. You'd not only be doing this for you, you'd be doing it for all the reps that will follow you in the future. I simply won't be able to support anyone in this union that doesn't fight for reps' rule, and is willing to concede on Scope.
Carl
I'm sure you guys have already gotten an earful to vote NO on this TA, and I want you to count me in that camp as well. Concessions of any kind in this environment are unacceptable to me - especially in areas where our survey said the negotiators were not to touch. For me, if scope is not strengthened, it must be an automatic NO regardless of what's in the rest of it. Scope concessions of any kind are unacceptable.
More importantly however, you need to send this back for the sake of our reps' role in our union. This top-down governance has to stop. Sending back a concessionary TA that didn't follow the will of our survey, is exactly what's needed to remind this administration who runs this union. You'd not only be doing this for you, you'd be doing it for all the reps that will follow you in the future. I simply won't be able to support anyone in this union that doesn't fight for reps' rule, and is willing to concede on Scope.
Carl
What info do you have regarding the conditions of the TA? Your letter sounds like you are aware of the agreement's terms.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#6013
Carl
#6014
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 0
From: Permanently scarred
Ok, so all we have is rumors at this point. BUT, the rumors we do have are all negative. Well, to most of us they're negative. Maybe giving up 5% of PS for 5% of pay and adding 2% on top of that is fine for some, but I think MOST of us can agree that in this environment (i.e. with the multiple BILLIONS in profit the company is making and the increased number of BILLIONS in profit the company is expected to make) that something more is needed in this TA, right?
So riddle me this: Who in the HE double hockey sticks can put up any kind of defense for such horse squeeze? I mean, who are these APC members and where did they come from? About all that is justifiable in a sane world is for an APCer who doesn't want to buy into the notion that there might be more truth to the (very likely) rumor of a turd coming in this TA to say, "Hey, I'm not willing to say no until I see what's in it." Other than that or, "I heard it was not as bad as the rest of you seem to think." But any talk like "Are you willing to wait 3 years if it's turned down." or the like is unbelievable. Seriously? That just boggles the mind. Apparently this kind of individual would take 4/1/1/1 with 4% given back in PS and concessions in sick leave, scope, and LCA OE bumps.
Again, who are these APCers and are they even part of our pilot group?
So riddle me this: Who in the HE double hockey sticks can put up any kind of defense for such horse squeeze? I mean, who are these APC members and where did they come from? About all that is justifiable in a sane world is for an APCer who doesn't want to buy into the notion that there might be more truth to the (very likely) rumor of a turd coming in this TA to say, "Hey, I'm not willing to say no until I see what's in it." Other than that or, "I heard it was not as bad as the rest of you seem to think." But any talk like "Are you willing to wait 3 years if it's turned down." or the like is unbelievable. Seriously? That just boggles the mind. Apparently this kind of individual would take 4/1/1/1 with 4% given back in PS and concessions in sick leave, scope, and LCA OE bumps.
Again, who are these APCers and are they even part of our pilot group?
#6015
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,146
Likes: 112
Problem is, my house isn't in Greece, and the one I do own went very underwater.
#6016
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,146
Likes: 112
The Council 1 update showed me the TA gave a shopping cart full of concessions to management. The Council 1 update also showed me that our cart was not very full. The MEC administration's constant denigration of profit sharing tells me there's a cut in profit sharing. Another source tells me there are indeed scope concessions. That'll do it for me.
Carl
Carl
#6017
I can tell you now. If the rumored give backs are only half true, and the rumored rates are accurate, we didn't get anything other concessionary contract in the most wildly profitable era of the airline industry, that has benefited and continues to from their new pricing paradigm. Unbundled Fees
How much was that stock buy back and dividend package for?
Time to move labor peace to the edge of the table. Careful with that! That labor peace is made of fine bone China. It breaks easily.
#6018
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,146
Likes: 112
We all pay dues. Some have to mention it all the time.
Do you think the rep you sent your email to said, "Wait a minute, I got a message from a guy that pays dues, better put that one at the top of the list." ?
BTW, the very definition of "Negotiate" means to deal or bargain with another or others. The only reason the company hasn't "iced" us and gone into the usual 3-5 year contract model is that they need something. I'm willing to see what it is and what value we can garner from their needs. Your belief that we should not deal with or bargain with the company would never get us a deal. It's unrealistic and will cost the pilot group.
If we don't like the deal we can vote no.
Do you think the rep you sent your email to said, "Wait a minute, I got a message from a guy that pays dues, better put that one at the top of the list." ?
BTW, the very definition of "Negotiate" means to deal or bargain with another or others. The only reason the company hasn't "iced" us and gone into the usual 3-5 year contract model is that they need something. I'm willing to see what it is and what value we can garner from their needs. Your belief that we should not deal with or bargain with the company would never get us a deal. It's unrealistic and will cost the pilot group.
If we don't like the deal we can vote no.
Sure, contracts are give and take. The last one was their take and this one is their give! And if they don't want to give, I'll take their accidental give (profit sharing) as is in the current contract.
#6019
New Hire
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
#6020
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 5
I saw them in there on Friday. They were huddled in the chief pilots office like it was a safe haven...Almost like they felt more comfortable with management than with the line pilots.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



