Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptCoolHand
I'm willing to pick up the fight again in 3.5yrs. I've been fighting this fight here at jb for over 10 how much did you help our union besides paying dues?
vote how you want, but your reasoning isn't there.
Vote how you want but if you wait for 3.5 years to fix these gross deficiencies, you will have considerably less leverage to do so because
you are sabotaging your long term efforts today. It's all about
precedent. Once you allow something to happen, it will be virtually impossible to undo it. You are being uninformed and naive if you think you can fix this 3.5 yrs later rather than now. They will have a considerably stronger argument to keep something that works (for them) rather than give into a negotiation.
The language in this TA is so weak that it's effectively no better than a PEA because virtually everything in it requires interpretation. That means that BJ will violate "your interpretation" of a clause in the contract, then you will be stuck in arbitration forever getting it fixed. Oh yes, and good luck getting ALPA to actually help you, much less win. Remember 3A.
Who benefits from vague legal language?
- BlueJet - they'll violate the contract under their "interpretation" of it and accept the results of arbitration as the "cost of doing business".
- Lawyers - they love ambiguity because they get paid just for spending time on something. Vagueness keeps them employed.
- ALPA - it gives them a "victory" (in their eyes) and keeps them as the monopoly in town. ALPA is already pretty excited to claim another "victory".
Who loses?
Vote NO... Fix TA 1 and get a TA 2 that has no loopholes.
F&H is a law firm - not a "union buster" in the literal sense. Their job is triage. Their job is to contain the effects of unionization by presenting
controlled opposition and
vague legal language that benefits the company.
With TA 1, F&H wins. We'll be stuck in "arbitration" forever just like with 3A, meanwhile BJ reaps the benefits from the "cost of doing business" (breaking the contract through interpretation).
This communique is for entertainment purposes only. It does not implicitly or explicitly acknowledge employment with any air carrier nor is any relationship implied. This communique does not represent the opinions or policies of ALPA or JB ALPA and does not represent the collective pilot group, ALPA, nor does it imply collective bargaining, advocacy, or workforce actions intended to disrupt operations.