Search
Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Skywest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-31-2011, 07:21 PM
  #101  
Line Holder
 
stamps's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Airbus FO / C-17 AC
Posts: 71
Default

Originally Posted by Sounder View Post
How far out do they have classes planned? I'm just trying to get a feel for how long reserve will be (I know it varies by base).
The farthest out I've seen is the Nov 28th Classes. Guessing there will be more after that though. What day did you interview last week?
stamps is offline  
Old 08-31-2011, 07:48 PM
  #102  
Line Holder
 
Sounder's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Position: The Arrr Jay
Posts: 49
Default

Originally Posted by stamps View Post
The farthest out I've seen is the Nov 28th Classes. Guessing there will be more after that though. What day did you interview last week?
Check your pm.
Sounder is offline  
Old 09-01-2011, 09:06 PM
  #103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: CL-65 / Gear Wrangler
Posts: 321
Default

Originally Posted by Sounder View Post
How far out do they have classes planned? I'm just trying to get a feel for how long reserve will be (I know it varies by base).
I was in the 3/28 class, and I'm a solid RSV in my and basically any other base. At least over the winter. Had a line in July, so did half my class, in our various bases, but we are all middle of the road RSVs with the fall/winter decrease in block hours.

Expect a 6 months minimum, any base from when you get on property.

Just my guess.
Piedmonster is offline  
Old 09-02-2011, 07:27 PM
  #104  
Line Holder
 
Sounder's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Position: The Arrr Jay
Posts: 49
Default

Originally Posted by Piedmonster View Post
I was in the 3/28 class, and I'm a solid RSV in my and basically any other base. At least over the winter. Had a line in July, so did half my class, in our various bases, but we are all middle of the road RSVs with the fall/winter decrease in block hours.

Expect a 6 months minimum, any base from when you get on property.

Just my guess.
How brutal is the RSV schedule? Are you flying a lot?
Sounder is offline  
Old 09-02-2011, 08:05 PM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: CL-65 / Gear Wrangler
Posts: 321
Default

Originally Posted by Sounder View Post
How brutal is the RSV schedule? Are you flying a lot?
340 hours credit in 3 months. I don't remember the block exactly off hand, but 95h/mo is about right.
Piedmonster is offline  
Old 09-06-2011, 08:16 PM
  #106  
On Reserve
 
Kramerica's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 19
Default

Originally Posted by MatchPoint View Post
...Last, Mgmt has made it known to SAPA that these will be replacement a/c for the -200 as they come off contract and lease starting in the near future...
Unless you are in SAPA and know more than the rest of us, I was under the impression that this was initially growth, and then gradually replacing -200 stuff, but not entirely replacement.

Regardless, if jet scope tightens down at the major carriers (seems to be the trend for the future), Skywest needs these Q400s really bad. If pilots want jobs at Skywest, then pilots need the Q400 really bad and they need the rates to be competitive. Take a look at every regional airline in which pilots demanded premium treatment/pay, they are either gone or going. I'm not saying fly the Q's for 200 rates, but we gotta be realistic.
Kramerica is offline  
Old 09-07-2011, 01:51 AM
  #107  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,275
Default

Originally Posted by Kramerica View Post
Unless you are in SAPA and know more than the rest of us, I was under the impression that this was initially growth, and then gradually replacing -200 stuff, but not entirely replacement.

Regardless, if jet scope tightens down at the major carriers (seems to be the trend for the future), Skywest needs these Q400s really bad. If pilots want jobs at Skywest, then pilots need the Q400 really bad and they need the rates to be competitive. Take a look at every regional airline in which pilots demanded premium treatment/pay, they are either gone or going. I'm not saying fly the Q's for 200 rates, but we gotta be realistic.
Scope is not going to tighten. I'm reasonably confident that current mainline pilots will not voluntarily give up any more scope, but when it comes right down to it the negotiating cost of getting rid of RJ's is far too high for those guys to pay...they would have to take a pay cut TODAY, and most are not going to do that. Especially the guys in the upper half of the seniority list.

Scope is like a cat in a bag...it's not going back in once it's out.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 09-07-2011, 04:22 AM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JustAMushroom's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Capt
Posts: 611
Default

Originally Posted by Kramerica View Post
Unless you are in SAPA and know more than the rest of us, I was under the impression that this was initially growth, and then gradually replacing -200 stuff, but not entirely replacement.

Regardless, if jet scope tightens down at the major carriers (seems to be the trend for the future), Skywest needs these Q400s really bad. If pilots want jobs at Skywest, then pilots need the Q400 really bad and they need the rates to be competitive. Take a look at every regional airline in which pilots demanded premium treatment/pay, they are either gone or going. I'm not saying fly the Q's for 200 rates, but we gotta be realistic.
This is typical management bs. Don't make decisions based on fear SW pilots! Remember when they put the 700 up for a vote and the planes were announced THE FOLLOWING DAY. it didn't matter what the vote was. The Board knows what these planes are worth to the company. It's the pilots that don't know what they're worth.

These guys keep squeezing bout every penny they can. Inc will still make boat loads of money from these planes even if we demand 700 rates.

Hold the line!
JustAMushroom is offline  
Old 09-07-2011, 06:39 AM
  #109  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Furloughed
Posts: 628
Default

Originally Posted by Kramerica View Post
Unless you are in SAPA and know more than the rest of us, I was under the impression that this was initially growth, and then gradually replacing -200 stuff, but not entirely replacement.

Regardless, if jet scope tightens down at the major carriers (seems to be the trend for the future), Skywest needs these Q400s really bad. If pilots want jobs at Skywest, then pilots need the Q400 really bad and they need the rates to be competitive. Take a look at every regional airline in which pilots demanded premium treatment/pay, they are either gone or going. I'm not saying fly the Q's for 200 rates, but we gotta be realistic.
Dude - You are part of the problem. SKW will get a bunch more respect if they do it for 700 rates. Be part of the solution and not the problem.
FL410 is offline  
Old 09-07-2011, 07:00 AM
  #110  
Line Holder
 
Nerfed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 54
Default

Hell if Horizon can make money with three quarters of the pilots topped out on the payscale I think Skywest should have no problem. With the younger work force you will still be the cheapest Q400 operator in the US.
Nerfed is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ghilis101
SkyWest
72
06-11-2019 03:53 PM
Lbell911
SkyWest
16
04-19-2015 08:19 AM
Splanky
Regional
47
01-28-2011 07:59 AM
Jack Bauer
Regional
25
11-01-2008 02:29 PM
geshields
Major
2
08-16-2005 03:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices