Search

Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Skywest

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-02-2014 | 09:12 AM
  #3821  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Default

Nevets - That's not the way the language is written. Our bid would be for 5 captains and 5 FOs for each aircraft transferred over. And then a seniority list integration would take place in accordance with the Allegheny Mohawk LPPs 3 & 13 (same as McCaskill-Bond). And then a bid at Skywest would take place for those aircraft. Captains would go over as captains and FOs as FOs. Every pilot would keep their longevity for all pay and benefit purposes.


Call me when CC hasn't figured out a way to move aircraft without taking pilots with them. They have you beat at your own game. Sorry to have to clue you in.
Old 01-02-2014 | 11:17 AM
  #3822  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by NVUS
Nevets - That's not the way the language is written. Our bid would be for 5 captains and 5 FOs for each aircraft transferred over. And then a seniority list integration would take place in accordance with the Allegheny Mohawk LPPs 3 & 13 (same as McCaskill-Bond). And then a bid at Skywest would take place for those aircraft. Captains would go over as captains and FOs as FOs. Every pilot would keep their longevity for all pay and benefit purposes.


Call me when CC hasn't figured out a way to move aircraft without taking pilots with them. They have you beat at your own game. Sorry to have to clue you in.

You are focusing on the wrong thing. You are being too short sided.

Yes, they can transfer aircraft without pilots. Once the leases expire, they can do whatever they want with those aircraft. I'm talking about a worse case scenario in which they decide to shutter XJT. They'll let the 50 seaters expire. But I don't think they'll let the 59 700/900s go to a competitor if they can prevent that. Those aircraft are the bread and butter, the big revenue maker, the way of the future. Also, don't discredit the bilateral flow agreement for the furlough pilots. You never know what could happen there.

Anyway, that's all short sided. You put faith in management negotiating and agreeing against your interest behind your back. That's really what you should be looking at. Their fiduciary responsibility is not to us pilots. It's solely to the investors.

I'm sure that if it ever came to be that they transfer the 700/900s, they'll just show you charts and graphs to convince you to see it the way they want you to see it.

By the way, this goes above the pay grade of CC. This is decided by BOD.
Old 01-02-2014 | 02:01 PM
  #3823  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,272
Likes: 0
From: Another RJ FO
Default

Stop feeding the troll. This thread needs to get back on track.
Old 01-02-2014 | 02:06 PM
  #3824  
Cruz5350's Avatar
Respek
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,915
Likes: 63
Default

Not sure if this has been asked before but has the implementation of 117 affected schedules? More specifically do you see a lot of wasted time in hotels like 20+ hours?
Old 01-02-2014 | 02:16 PM
  #3825  
Peak13's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by rcfd13
Stop feeding the troll. This thread needs to get back on track.
+1 for that.
Old 01-02-2014 | 02:31 PM
  #3826  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,272
Likes: 0
From: Another RJ FO
Default

Originally Posted by Cruz5350
Not sure if this has been asked before but has the implementation of 117 affected schedules? More specifically do you see a lot of wasted time in hotels like 20+ hours?
Yes. There are a lot of 30 hour overnights and extremely low credit trips. I'm a really junior line holder though and the trips I got in Jan aren't too bad. It didn't even affect my commutability that much. There are still plenty of good trips if you're senior enough to hold them.

I think it varies a lot by base. I was looking at open time in other domiciles and there's some seriously bad stuff posted. The trips in my base isn't horrible.

Last edited by rcfd13; 01-02-2014 at 03:02 PM.
Old 01-02-2014 | 03:04 PM
  #3827  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by rcfd13
Stop feeding the troll. This thread needs to get back on track.
This is precisely what I'm talking about. Most of you aren't willing to even discuss these issues. It's ok. I'm done with the discussion if all of you are. Sorry for the interruption.
Old 01-02-2014 | 07:54 PM
  #3828  
Dumb Pilot
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: Broke
Default

The lines haven't gotten that bad here. In fact I flew with a few fuse that had blocks of 40 in 7 days. The almost worked one week on one off, and. They were junior.



Nevets, you're not discussing anything. You are blaming Skywest for the failure of expressjet to get a descent contract.
Old 01-02-2014 | 08:07 PM
  #3829  
Cruz5350's Avatar
Respek
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,915
Likes: 63
Default

Thanks for answering my questions guys.
Old 01-03-2014 | 07:34 AM
  #3830  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: OO-RJ
Default

My trips are all fairly low paying trips. 3 four days and a two day. only 72 hours credit. They had to give me a reserve day to make it up. Im pretty junior in Houston (81%) Not very commutable at all but I live in base so not an issue. No 30hour layovers so thats good.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ghilis101
SkyWest
72
06-11-2019 03:53 PM
Lbell911
SkyWest
16
04-19-2015 08:19 AM
Splanky
Regional
47
01-28-2011 07:59 AM
Jack Bauer
Regional
25
11-01-2008 02:29 PM
geshields
Major
2
08-16-2005 03:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices