Skywest
12-19-2014, 08:25 AM
#8051
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2012
Position: OO RJ FO
Posts: 437
Originally Posted by FaceBiter
Anyone else read the "Freudian Slip?" thread on the SAPA forums? Pretty sure the lifers are high on peyote.
12-19-2014, 08:39 AM
#8052
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Capt
Posts: 611
Originally Posted by Jet87
I hope you are one of the ones defending us... I can't believe some of the lifers here. They want to fly 190s at SkyWest rates and call us entitled for want those planes to stay at mainline.
12-19-2014, 09:09 AM
#8053
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: 175 CA
Posts: 1,544
It would take a lot to get mainline pilots to cave
On 190, it's starts the slippery slope again. Ppl think we are getting 190s because the sim is capable of doing it, I think it's just another way to fund the sim through renting it out whilst giving skywest another sim to increase output should the need arise.
On 190, it's starts the slippery slope again. Ppl think we are getting 190s because the sim is capable of doing it, I think it's just another way to fund the sim through renting it out whilst giving skywest another sim to increase output should the need arise.
12-19-2014, 09:42 AM
#8054
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: A-320
Posts: 1,122
At US Airways I trained in a 170 sim. The 170 and 190 are probably more similar than the CRJ 700 and 900. They have separate type ratings but they gave us both.
12-19-2014, 09:52 AM
#8055
Dumb Pilot
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Position: Broke
Posts: 784
Originally Posted by rcfd13
The Surface Pro 3 is pretty nice. A lot faster than the iPad. I wouldn't complain at all about getting one of those. If they decide to give everyone a Surface 2 that's a different story.
12-19-2014, 11:00 AM
#8056
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: 175 CA
Posts: 1,544
Originally Posted by viper548
At US Airways I trained in a 170 sim. The 170 and 190 are probably more similar than the CRJ 700 and 900. They have separate type ratings but they gave us both.
12-19-2014, 11:14 AM
#8057
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 516
Originally Posted by Squallrider
We're typed on all 3 at skywest, one ride for all three types.
We're not typed on all 3. We're qualified on all three. It's not like we have 3 separate type ratings, it's a single type rating for all 3 variants.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
12-19-2014, 01:02 PM
#8058
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: A-320
Posts: 1,122
Originally Posted by Squallrider
We're typed on all 3 at skywest, one ride for all three types.
They were all under CL-65 type rating. I got ERJ-170 and ERJ-190 at airways. Strange how those planes have different type ratings but have very few differences (like the 700/900) but the CL-65 covers the 200/700/900 and there are quite a few differences between the 200 and the 700/900.
12-19-2014, 02:22 PM
#8059
Dumb Pilot
Joined APC: Apr 2013
Position: Broke
Posts: 784
Ya 900 landings are very interesting after flying the 200 for a year
12-19-2014, 02:27 PM
#8060
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 205
Originally Posted by viper548
I came from SkyWest and was checked out on all 3.
They were all under CL-65 type rating. I got ERJ-170 and ERJ-190 at airways. Strange how those planes have different type ratings but have very few differences (like the 700/900) but the CL-65 covers the 200/700/900 and there are quite a few differences between the 200 and the 700/900.
They were all under CL-65 type rating. I got ERJ-170 and ERJ-190 at airways. Strange how those planes have different type ratings but have very few differences (like the 700/900) but the CL-65 covers the 200/700/900 and there are quite a few differences between the 200 and the 700/900.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
