Skywest
#8081
Some of us choose to look at the glass as half full. Attitudes are contagious...nothing worse than someone who consistently spews negativity.
CC i agree, most of the guys I've flown with as well don't have a sour attitude and are a pleasure to fly with.
CC i agree, most of the guys I've flown with as well don't have a sour attitude and are a pleasure to fly with.
#8082
You don't have to be a negative wretch. You can be positive and also have the opinion that you would be better off with a union. Think of it this way, if SAPA was the same organization it is now with the same people in its leadership and committees, except for that they were recognized by the NMB as your collective bargaining agent, how would that create any more problems than they do now? Giving them union status just gives them an actual voice, a place at the table, more tools to use, leverage, etc. It shouldn't change anything as far as your current labor-management relations. What problems do you think would be created?
It was brought up earlier in the thread by somebody but part of what makes skywest great is the family atmosphere. everyone gets treated well (somewhat).
The problem is that if they give us pilots more, other positions will want more as well. If we were unionized, the company could just point the blame and say they have no choice but to give us more because of the union. Thus we get more.
That all being said, I just wish the PPM was an enforcible contract complete with a glossary and less loopholes. Specifically the "company need".
define what is and isn't company need. right now company need is anything cs wants no matter what else is going on in the world.
#8083
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,906
Likes: 5
From: B767
Id be shocked beyond years if we went down to 2-3 years. I'm at 4 and I'm 400 away, with no net gain/loss of flying (unlikely since were parking about 35 Bros). Skywest is filled with very senior people that won't lewve even if they are 20-25 years from retirement. Even a great influx of new flying such as 50 planes would only move up the upgrade a year. (250 pilots, current attrition is 20-25 captains a month). There's a big bubble that will lower it about 1.5 years but I doubt it'll go below 5 anytime soon, hope I'm proven wrong.
I don't know how long upgrades will take, but I can't imagine it will be more than 1-2 years (for you and I). I think you'll be fine.
#8084
Banned
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
So why were the sfo guys put on reserve? I'm sure they can park them so that no one is required to sit reserve like the SFO guys. I just mentioned that example to make a point.
I agree.
It was brought up earlier in the thread by somebody but part of what makes skywest great is the family atmosphere. everyone gets treated well (somewhat).
The problem is that if they give us pilots more, other positions will want more as well. If we were unionized, the company could just point the blame and say they have no choice but to give us more because of the union. Thus we get more.
That all being said, I just wish the PPM was an enforcible contract complete with a glossary and less loopholes. Specifically the "company need".
define what is and isn't company need. right now company need is anything cs wants no matter what else is going on in the world.
It was brought up earlier in the thread by somebody but part of what makes skywest great is the family atmosphere. everyone gets treated well (somewhat).
The problem is that if they give us pilots more, other positions will want more as well. If we were unionized, the company could just point the blame and say they have no choice but to give us more because of the union. Thus we get more.
That all being said, I just wish the PPM was an enforcible contract complete with a glossary and less loopholes. Specifically the "company need".
define what is and isn't company need. right now company need is anything cs wants no matter what else is going on in the world.
And the family atmosphere doesn't have to change. Look, they will not give you anything. Just like they don't give you anything right now. They only give you as much as they feel they need to. With a union, their perception changes. But it will still be up to you guys to work with management in using that extra leverage to get something that both sides can agree with.
As for the PPM, until there is a contract, whatever has been documented as current practice in regards to "company need" and loopholes, will be status quo and that will be enforceable.
#8085
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,544
Likes: 0
From: 175 CA
I don't understand your math... I've been here just over 3.5 years, and am 300 away from an upgrade per the award today. That is going off straight seniority, which is WAY worst case. Of those 300, many of them aren't willing to bid first available (or even want to be CAs period).
I don't know how long upgrades will take, but I can't imagine it will be more than 1-2 years (for you and I). I think you'll be fine.
I don't know how long upgrades will take, but I can't imagine it will be more than 1-2 years (for you and I). I think you'll be fine.
#8086
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,906
Likes: 5
From: B767
Ok, that makes sense. I was hired a little before you. Still, I think we're both looking at 1-2 years.
#8087
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,544
Likes: 0
From: 175 CA
I hope you're right but the Bro going away and the ebb and flow of how much airlines like the 50 (based on gas prices) makes upgrade a moving target. Hopefully half the rumors around here come true haha
#8088
Upgrades are at seven and a half years now. And dropping.
.
#8089
There was a pretty good stall in hiring between 2007 - 2010. Seniority numbers around 2230 are 2010 hires. Most junior CA awarded today was 2037 or thereabout. Getting closer.
#8090
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
From: RJ Captain
There are about 100 Brasilia captains that will need to transition to one of the jets over the next 6 months. That's going to slow down the upgrades a little bit.
Attrition wise we've had about 15 captains a month leave. One could presume that number will increase.
400 First Officers currently have the seniority to hold captain in MSP or ORD. They've chose not to bid it, with only a small percentage of them having a standing bid in for west coast domiciles they don't have the seniority for yet. I have been flying with a lot of guys out of SLC that could have held MSP/ORD a while ago that are thinking about bidding it next year. They've been putting off the commute until they would have some seniority out there.
All we need to do is announce a Detroit or NYC domicile and 2010 guys will start upgrading. New domiciles always go real junior, especially in undesirable places. (and no, there aren't any rumors of domiciles out of either of those places)
Attrition wise we've had about 15 captains a month leave. One could presume that number will increase.
400 First Officers currently have the seniority to hold captain in MSP or ORD. They've chose not to bid it, with only a small percentage of them having a standing bid in for west coast domiciles they don't have the seniority for yet. I have been flying with a lot of guys out of SLC that could have held MSP/ORD a while ago that are thinking about bidding it next year. They've been putting off the commute until they would have some seniority out there.
All we need to do is announce a Detroit or NYC domicile and 2010 guys will start upgrading. New domiciles always go real junior, especially in undesirable places. (and no, there aren't any rumors of domiciles out of either of those places)
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



