Search

Notices
SkyWest Regional Airline

Skywest v2.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-13-2016 | 07:03 PM
  #2611  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by disillusioned
Look at BH's update on the forums. They are making it sound like they will not pay relocation in hopes that people will voluntarily transfer out. If you do that, they don't have to pay relocation. As it stands right now, they have agreed to pay relocation for 2 pilots. So you're right. If there are only 2 pilots left when they shut down IAH, then every pilots that is forced out will get paid.
The update says they will pay relocation for 2 spots.....I thought that meant domiciles not people. ie you will get relocation if you go to dtw.
Old 08-13-2016 | 08:36 PM
  #2612  
skypine27's Avatar
Proponent of Hysteria
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,085
Likes: 5
From: "Part of the problem." : JL
Default

Originally Posted by JonSnow
Hi, few questions for SkyWest pilots:
What airline Skywest flies from ORD? And how hard it is to get ORD for junior?
Does SkyWest have any refersal/sign up bonus?
Is this real or bait?

Where did you learn English, Sears?
Old 08-13-2016 | 09:01 PM
  #2613  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Cefiro
The update says they will pay relocation for 2 spots.....I thought that meant domiciles not people. ie you will get relocation if you go to dtw.
BH - company is NOT offering a relocation incentive when they have in the following cases in the past for ALL PILOTS who are displaced (emphasis is mine)

RJ - originally the company wasn't going to offer ANYONE relocation incentive and as of 8pm last night we were able to get 2 SPOTS (again emphasis mine)

Anyone that thinks the company will do the right thing and take care of the pilots and their family's that are getting displaced will probably be disappointed. The new SGU motto is money over people. They are hoping that everyone will transfer out and save them some cash. Every time they have a chance to do the right thing, they somehow manage to show how much they care about money vs their employees.
Old 08-13-2016 | 09:40 PM
  #2614  
Cruz5350's Avatar
Respek
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,915
Likes: 62
Default

@Disillusioned

I cant tell if you're disappointed or surprised? I think you've been in this regional game longer than me, but every time I've seen a situation come up where a company could do the right thing they almost never do. From an economics standpoint you're asking them to spend more money so see it from their eyes.... why would they? The regionals have always operated on a who can do it cheaper model and still make acceptable profits, sadly us pilots are not in the drivers seat in regards to bargaining for better pay. We've been able to cover all the attrition with new hires and it honestly doesn't appear to be swinging the other direction anytime soon. If IAH closes that will just help the staffing model that much more and we already know that we have flying not being renewed. I don't see us having a leg to bargain for raises due to staffing anytime soon. If you want a pay raise you'll have to leave and go somewhere else, otherwise accept the mess were in and deal with it. I hate that this is the case just as much as anyone else, but I'm over getting bent out of shape about it.
Old 08-13-2016 | 10:14 PM
  #2615  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Cruz5350
@Disillusioned

I cant tell if you're disappointed or surprised? I think you've been in this regional game longer than me, but every time I've seen a situation come up where a company could do the right thing they almost never do. From an economics standpoint you're asking them to spend more money so see it from their eyes.... why would they? The regionals have always operated on a who can do it cheaper model and still make acceptable profits, sadly us pilots are not in the drivers seat in regards to bargaining for better pay. We've been able to cover all the attrition with new hires and it honestly doesn't appear to be swinging the other direction anytime soon. If IAH closes that will just help the staffing model that much more and we already know that we have flying not being renewed. I don't see us having a leg to bargain for raises due to staffing anytime soon. If you want a pay raise you'll have to leave and go somewhere else, otherwise accept the mess were in and deal with it. I hate that this is the case just as much as anyone else, but I'm over getting bent out of shape about it.
Disappointed but not surprised. When I was applying, I waited until I could get the 1,000 hours because I really wanted SW. My friends that went to other regionals told me horror stories of getting extended into a day off after not being used during their reserve days and general mistreatment. I feel our QOL is under constant attack here and the boiling water has been increased so gradual that people don't understand how much we have lost over the years.

I really had planned on just staying at SW. Didn't care if I upgraded fast since I wanted to just be around to see my kids grow up. But after I realized that SW places just little value on seniority and my QOL didn't really increase as my seniority got higher, I started working hard to get out. I figure if I am going to have to work 16 days a month in the top 1/3 of my domicile, I may as well be making more money at a major doing it. If we had half the protection as our union sister company, they wouldn't be able to keep up with attrition. As it stands right now, we take on all this extra flying from our partners at a premium, and force our pilot group to fly 95+ hour lines each month at straight pay. Don't let the seniority lists fool you. I have already proven time and time again that it is filled with cadets and other pilots that are not on-site. I think they do this to give a false sense of insecurity to our pilot group and that they we have no negotiating leverage because they are filling classes to keep up with attrition.

Most of my posts are just to let those that are looking here to know what they are in for. I didn't realize the value of representation when I was trying to hard to get my hours to be hired at SW. You are 100% correct in things not getting any better as long as we are filling classes. When you ask why would they spend more money than they need to, I am just asking them to honor the agreements they made with their pilot group. It should be very apparent to everyone how little power SAPA has to help our group. And as the attrition increases, there will be even less people to help remind those coming in of what handshake agreements and promises were made by the company. But eventually their will be a tipping point where their choices to make more money will be lost in the lack of goodwill with the pilot group. Hopefully I will not be around to witness that disappointment firsthand.
Old 08-14-2016 | 05:03 AM
  #2616  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by disillusioned
The new SGU motto is money over people.
Nothing new about that, began when RR was forced out as COO.
Old 08-14-2016 | 07:15 AM
  #2617  
Cruz5350's Avatar
Respek
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,915
Likes: 62
Default

Thanks for the reply Disillusioned I was just wondering what your stance was since you've been a long time poster on here.
Old 08-14-2016 | 10:16 AM
  #2618  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Cruz5350
Thanks for the reply Disillusioned I was just wondering what your stance was since you've been a long time poster on here.
Question for you Cruz. Since you have had experience at other regionals, is SW as bad as some think? I realize that even with all the crap we put up with that we are still better off than some, and maybe that is what is the driving force is behind us getting all the new hires?

I know that most out there are just trying to build hours and experience at a regional until they can move on. And maybe all this is just to give incentive to those that are comfortable to move on. They say that regionals should never be a career destination but I fought that wisdom for as long as I could. Until ALL regionals are on the same page and not whipsawing each other, I'm afraid not much will change.
Old 08-14-2016 | 10:43 AM
  #2619  
Apokleros's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
From: ERJ
Default

For sure. I came here with the expectation that I may not move on, even though other regionals allege to be able to offer a faster upgrade. A lot of new hires are mistakenly assuming that they will move on to Delta or United after two years after being hired at a regional just because of Joe Bob who supposedly did as a low time FO and didn't upgrade, but that is seldom the rule, more so the exception, and why not go to a regional like SkyWest which will most likely weather the coming storm fairly well as compared to regionals like Envoy or Republic which are already feeling the gust front?
Old 08-14-2016 | 11:10 AM
  #2620  
Cruz5350's Avatar
Respek
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,915
Likes: 62
Default

Originally Posted by disillusioned
Question for you Cruz. Since you have had experience at other regionals, is SW as bad as some think? I realize that even with all the crap we put up with that we are still better off than some, and maybe that is what is the driving force is behind us getting all the new hires?

I know that most out there are just trying to build hours and experience at a regional until they can move on. And maybe all this is just to give incentive to those that are comfortable to move on. They say that regionals should never be a career destination but I fought that wisdom for as long as I could. Until ALL regionals are on the same page and not whipsawing each other, I'm afraid not much will change.
There is no comparing SkyWest to my time at Silver just two different airlines, as far as my short time at Horizon it was about the same with a slight edge to Horizon because of how much better the compensation was. Looking at what's going on now at Horizon I think SkyWest is the better option. Having a Union doesn't make everything perfect but it does give the pilot group a little more leverage to fight for and enforce contract issues. The whole IAH closing issues you brought up would be handled vastly different if we had a union. SGU can escape all this by passing just enough along to keep us from unionizing and we buy off on it. The biggest complaint you'll get from people at SkyWest for more than say 5 years or so is I don't want a percent of my pay going to a union to waste on nothing. Usually these guys I hear that from are senior and have never had to deal with issues where a union could help them. We can debate unions all day for their positive and negatives cause both sides aren't necessarily wrong, but I'd prefer one for the just in case moment I need it. YMMV
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ghilis101
SkyWest
72
06-11-2019 03:53 PM
JoeyMeatballs
Regional
160
04-28-2008 06:45 PM
Ellen
Regional
15
05-15-2007 09:53 AM
JustAMushroom
Regional
65
07-16-2006 10:44 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices