Upgrade times
05-16-2021 | 06:48 PM
#241
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 64
Minus the 2 year plus grounding of the Max fleet, then half of the Max fleet re-grounded for over a month, the NG pickle fork grounding, the NG fan blade inspection grounding, and the classic skin tears. There seems to be a decent portion of the fleet that gets grounded about every 2 years. At least that’s what history shows. It’s a risk running one fleet type.
History shows year after year of profits at SWA while everyone else went boom and bust.
05-17-2021 | 12:32 PM
#243
On Reserve
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
05-17-2021 | 12:59 PM
#244
weekends off? Nope...
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 2,409
Likes: 136
If we had 2 fleets, we then have double the chance of a fleet grounding. A grounding that takes down half the fleet is no less crippling than a grounding that takes down the entire fleet. That is also a very low probability event. The added complexity however would be evident from day 1, with an absolute certain probability of occurring. So the added benefit of mitigating a low probability event does not outweigh the added cost/complexity to our model.
05-17-2021 | 03:06 PM
#246
gets time off
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,513
Likes: 95
Andrew W mentioned two airframes would have zero benefits to subvert risk of grounding. We would need 4 or more different airframes to mitigate risk from groundings. Thus it wasn’t feasible. The added cost from a second airframe was prohibitive.
05-17-2021 | 03:34 PM
#247
weekends off? Nope...
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 2,409
Likes: 136
Yup. Exactly what he said. I think I'll trust that guy over anyone on here that thinks it's as easy as adding a 2nd type without considering the complications.
05-17-2021 | 03:42 PM
#248
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 282
Likes: 1
You will see him as CEO one day.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
