Search

Notices

Upgrade times

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-09-2021 | 08:09 AM
  #461  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 34
Likes: 1
Default

I’d expect next year to see a fair amount of new hires and upgrades.

Lets that say we finish 2022 with 760 airplanes. We are flying I think about 650 now, and have a total fleet of 730. Add in roughly 30 net growth and that’s how I get 760. Feel free to correct, I’m using napkin math.

At our current Manning of 13 pilots per plane (8500 active/650 jets) 760 would require about 9900 pilots. Add in 100 retirements and suddenly that crazy 1000 new hires and 1000 upgrades rumor might actually be plausible.

But then again, I could be wrong!

Last edited by Wildturkey; 06-09-2021 at 08:22 AM.
Reply
Old 06-09-2021 | 09:42 AM
  #462  
at6d's Avatar
— No Relief On Scope —
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 4,531
Likes: 306
From: B737 Left Seat
Default

According to myseniority.com , I’m currently at 74% as a late 2015 hire.

Captains retiring that are senior to you:
within 12 months - 99
within 2 years - 244
within 3 years - 386
within 5 years - 759
within 10 years - 2157
within 15 years - 3496


There are approximately 1190ish above me that can hold it.
Reply
Old 06-09-2021 | 10:09 AM
  #463  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Wildturkey
I’d expect next year to see a fair amount of new hires and upgrades.

Lets that say we finish 2022 with 760 airplanes. We are flying I think about 650 now, and have a total fleet of 730. Add in roughly 30 net growth and that’s how I get 760. Feel free to correct, I’m using napkin math.

At our current Manning of 13 pilots per plane (8500 active/650 jets) 760 would require about 9900 pilots. Add in 100 retirements and suddenly that crazy 1000 new hires and 1000 upgrades rumor might actually be plausible.

But then again, I could be wrong!
I’d say 13 per aircraft is a bit fat on staffing level. 12.5 sounds more realistic and desirable to me. Whats my reasoning…
Assuming we currently have 300 pilots out on medical, military leave (aside from remaining ExTOs) -> we are currently staffed with 8200 active pilots to operate 650 aircraft (9000 - 500 FOs on ExTo - 300 out on medical).
This seems to be a good spot (Premium in the summer for everybody).
Assuming we grow by 30 aircraft, we would need to add about 500 pilots next year.
375 (30 x 12.5) + 100 retirements. Round it up to 500.
Thats my prediction based on my napkin math.

Did I mention that I am a pilot and thus an expert on everything and anything😬
Reply
Old 06-09-2021 | 10:21 AM
  #464  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 34
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by Typhoondiver
I’d say 13 per aircraft is a bit fat on staffing level. 12.5 sounds more realistic and desirable to me. Whats my reasoning…
Assuming we currently have 300 pilots out on medical, military leave (aside from remaining ExTOs) -> we are currently staffed with 8200 active pilots to operate 650 aircraft (9000 - 500 FOs on ExTo - 300 out on medical).
This seems to be a good spot (Premium in the summer for everybody).
Assuming we grow by 30 aircraft, we would need to add about 500 pilots next year.
375 (30 x 12.5) + 100 retirements. Round it up to 500.
Thats my prediction based on my napkin math.

Did I mention that I am a pilot and thus an expert on everything and anything😬
Ha. All good points. I agree that less than 13 is optimal and (though they didn’t give an example) the network planning people did mention that they want more staffing efficiency. I think you’re math is solid and probably more likely.

The good thing is that our firm orders plus options give us a pretty clear picture what we are capable of flexing up to if we see the opportunity.
Reply
Old 06-09-2021 | 10:40 AM
  #465  
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
Furloughed Again?!
15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,948
Likes: 109
From: Boeing 737
Default

Originally Posted by at6d
According to myseniority.com , I’m currently at 74% as a late 2015 hire.

Captains retiring that are senior to you:
within 12 months - 99
within 2 years - 244
within 3 years - 386
within 5 years - 759
within 10 years - 2157
within 15 years - 3496


There are approximately 1190ish above me that can hold it.

Someday...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 06-09-2021 | 11:19 AM
  #466  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Wildturkey
Ha. All good points. I agree that less than 13 is optimal and (though they didn’t give an example) the network planning people did mention that they want more staffing efficiency. I think you’re math is solid and probably more likely.

The good thing is that our firm orders plus options give us a pretty clear picture what we are capable of flexing up to if we see the opportunity.
We can be hopeful for a brighter future unless the whole demand thing takes another nosedive. I am cautiously optimistic but will hold off on week long celebrations until we have actually hired some pilots off the street.
Reply
Old 06-09-2021 | 12:37 PM
  #467  
hoover's Avatar
At your mom's house
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,675
Likes: 449
From: cpt 737
Default

Originally Posted by at6d
According to myseniority.com , I’m currently at 74% as a late 2015 hire.

Captains retiring that are senior to you:
within 12 months - 99
within 2 years - 244
within 3 years - 386
within 5 years - 759
within 10 years - 2157
within 15 years - 3496


There are approximately 1190ish above me that can hold it.
how many of those 1190 are bypassing? 700?
If that holds you're a yr away
Reply
Old 06-09-2021 | 01:01 PM
  #468  
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
Furloughed Again?!
15 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,948
Likes: 109
From: Boeing 737
Default

Originally Posted by hoover
how many of those 1190 are bypassing? 700?
If that holds you're a yr away

How many of those were bypassing before Covid?

How many are still bypassing 18 months later?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 06-09-2021 | 01:41 PM
  #469  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 34
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by ZapBrannigan
How many of those were bypassing before Covid?

How many are still bypassing 18 months later?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Honestly, with premium flowing, I don’t think it will change much. Sure, maybe a few have had it and want the left seat at all costs. But, if we go through another downturn, would you rather be a senior FO or a commuting reserve captain with a seat lock and no chance of movement? I think most would still rather upgrade on their terms rather than a fear based move.

Edit: Good luck to you though!
Reply
Old 06-09-2021 | 02:06 PM
  #470  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,348
Likes: 331
Default

Originally Posted by ZapBrannigan
Someday...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sad thing is, you'd still look like that in that seat had you stayed at US Airways
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
midlifeflysis
Republic Airways
70
10-05-2018 12:44 PM
joepilot
FedEx
29
01-24-2017 03:45 AM
sevendeuce
Regional
9
03-27-2007 12:08 AM
molson247
Regional
2
03-26-2007 04:15 AM
RockBass14
Regional
13
07-20-2005 06:08 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices