DOWNFALL: The Case Against Boeing
02-21-2022 | 09:17 AM
#61
Banned
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Man, Boeing was pretty much caught red handed here. Have you seen the internal memos that have been made public. They did everything they could to conceal the fact that this new system even existed and to make sure that regulators would not require additional training the to new variant. How they escaped criminal prosecution is a detriment to society. The whole situation stemmed from greed and nothing more. The NTSB doesn’t have jurisdiction in other countries and by no means was entitled to be there. They are not the end all be all of aviation accident expertise.
NONE OF THESE WHERE EVER ADDRESSED DURING THE SO CALLED INVESTIGATION.
1. The airplane was not airworthy for days prior to the crash. Dur to previous write ups with the AOA.
2. At takeoff, aircraft control warnings were triggered that were not analyzed for the impact of sequence of events.
3. Flight crews did not follow procedures.
4. Quality of pilot training is never examined.
5. 250 hour pilot flying commercial transport aircraft.
Yeah it’s all Boeing fault!, Right!
02-21-2022 | 09:55 AM
#63
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,568
Likes: 128
From: Left
Hmm,
NONE OF THESE WHERE EVER ADDRESSED DURING THE SO CALLED INVESTIGATION.
1. The airplane was not airworthy for days prior to the crash. Dur to previous write ups with the AOA.
2. At takeoff, aircraft control warnings were triggered that were not analyzed for the impact of sequence of events.
3. Flight crews did not follow procedures.
4. Quality of pilot training is never examined.
5. 250 hour pilot flying commercial transport aircraft.
Yeah it’s all Boeing fault!, Right!
NONE OF THESE WHERE EVER ADDRESSED DURING THE SO CALLED INVESTIGATION.
1. The airplane was not airworthy for days prior to the crash. Dur to previous write ups with the AOA.
2. At takeoff, aircraft control warnings were triggered that were not analyzed for the impact of sequence of events.
3. Flight crews did not follow procedures.
4. Quality of pilot training is never examined.
5. 250 hour pilot flying commercial transport aircraft.
Yeah it’s all Boeing fault!, Right!
This says it all. Anyone who could have handled a runway trim could have caught and corrected this. Then again, what do I know I only have over 25,000 hrs on this damn plane
02-21-2022 | 10:04 AM
#64
weekends off? Nope...
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 2,408
Likes: 134
Hmm,
NONE OF THESE WHERE EVER ADDRESSED DURING THE SO CALLED INVESTIGATION.
1. The airplane was not airworthy for days prior to the crash. Dur to previous write ups with the AOA.
2. At takeoff, aircraft control warnings were triggered that were not analyzed for the impact of sequence of events.
3. Flight crews did not follow procedures.
4. Quality of pilot training is never examined.
5. 250 hour pilot flying commercial transport aircraft.
Yeah it’s all Boeing fault!, Right!
NONE OF THESE WHERE EVER ADDRESSED DURING THE SO CALLED INVESTIGATION.
1. The airplane was not airworthy for days prior to the crash. Dur to previous write ups with the AOA.
2. At takeoff, aircraft control warnings were triggered that were not analyzed for the impact of sequence of events.
3. Flight crews did not follow procedures.
4. Quality of pilot training is never examined.
5. 250 hour pilot flying commercial transport aircraft.
Yeah it’s all Boeing fault!, Right!
02-21-2022 | 10:25 AM
#65
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,588
Likes: 4
From: MD-88 FO
02-21-2022 | 10:34 AM
#66
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,568
Likes: 128
From: Left
I said anyone who could handle a runway trim could have handled this scenario. I did not say I have 25,000 hrs, I said over 25k I am sure it is much closer to 30k.
Hate all you want, but the facts speak for themselves.
02-21-2022 | 10:46 AM
#67
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,588
Likes: 4
From: MD-88 FO
You mean the facts of the internal conversations at that Boeing execs and managers had via memos and emails that said showed that they were purposefully deceiving regulators and customers worldwide? Yeah, those facts to indeed speak for themselves.
02-21-2022 | 10:55 AM
#68
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 0
Wait, are you THE Mozam? The one who took VSP? The errant knight? I always assumed you were not THE Mozam because many of the things you have said, I’d have thought the OG Mozam would never have said.
02-21-2022 | 02:23 PM
#70
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,568
Likes: 128
From: Left
I never said Boeing does not have any culpability in this matter .
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
