Search

Notices

JetBlue looking to merge

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-2026 | 06:30 AM
  #171  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,275
Likes: 270
From: B737CA
Default

Originally Posted by Cyio
This is exactly what I have been saying. I think people get so emotionally charged about scope that they can't see the forest for the trees. I can be pro-scope and still be okay with a separate pay scale on our list. There is no chance you are going to pay a 175 CA the same rate as a 737 CA. It doesn't happen anywhere because it's not feasible. I still want our pilots flying the jets, though; I'm OK with a different rate.

Precisely... I don't know why we're all hung up on pay scale of a smaller plane, but if it's something much smaller like 175... so what? So this plane goes junior then... I'm sure every Delta or United pilot would love to be on a Dreamliner/A350 pay scale, but unfortunately, some are flying "the best jet ever made" (717 according to some Trannies, for all the new guys here), others are flying B737 or A320's and they're all on different scales are they not? I'd much rather have our junior pilots fly the lower paying airplane and have seniority dictate who flies what than outsource the flying and potentially putting their livelihoods at risk.
Reply
Old 04-10-2026 | 07:31 AM
  #172  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,120
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by CA1900
For what it's worth, we've had a blended rate for a while. We flew the 737-500 (122 seats) and the -800 (175) seats for the same rate since the -800 showed up in 2013. 43% more seats for the same money.

If they're going to add wide bodies or RJs, it's going to require an un-blending of the 737 rate as well, I think.
We also have a blended 737 rate. Big three seem to break out the stretch models as their own category.
Reply
Old 04-10-2026 | 10:53 AM
  #173  
mulcher's Avatar
gets time off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,515
Likes: 98
Default

Originally Posted by hoover
considering the union said during last contract education cycle we should be getting paid WB rates for the 737 based on productivity and how much we made the company i think there should be no problem if another smaller jet pays our current 737 rates and we negotiate a higher WB rate for the 737.
​youre right tho it's just a mental exercise. But the real gymnastics will be when the union convinces us we should give away our scope for helping the company grow and the company promises to take care of us this next contract. But for reals this time. Pinky promise
Yet CAs don’t even get leading NB rates. Yeah JR drinks for free…NOT!
Reply
Old 04-10-2026 | 11:49 AM
  #174  
hoover's Avatar
At your mom's house
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,706
Likes: 472
From: cpt 737
Default

Originally Posted by RJSAviator76
Precisely... I don't know why we're all hung up on pay scale of a smaller plane, but if it's something much smaller like 175... so what? So this plane goes junior then... I'm sure every Delta or United pilot would love to be on a Dreamliner/A350 pay scale, but unfortunately, some are flying "the best jet ever made" (717 according to some Trannies, for all the new guys here), others are flying B737 or A320's and they're all on different scales are they not? I'd much rather have our junior pilots fly the lower paying airplane and have seniority dictate who flies what than outsource the flying and potentially putting their livelihoods at risk.
what if they say the 175 will only be in Dallas and they will severely chop the 737 that flies out of the Dallas bid packet, will it be a jr plane then?
The small plane won't be in all bases so one cant say itll only affect jr people.
unless guys woth 20 yrs here now have to commute to stay on the better paying plane because there base no longer flies it.
Just like the legacies I guess
Reply
Old 04-10-2026 | 11:50 AM
  #175  
hoover's Avatar
At your mom's house
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,706
Likes: 472
From: cpt 737
Default

Originally Posted by mulcher
Yet CAs don’t even get leading NB rates. Yeah JR drinks for free…NOT!
FO contract!!
Did we just fly together?
Reply
Old 04-10-2026 | 12:04 PM
  #176  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 65
Likes: 27
Default

I would be surprised if anyone hired past 4 years would be fine to fly a lower paying jet. Won’t happen. Nobody joined swa to do regional flying at lower pay. If the difference is small such as for a DL guy on A220 vs 737 then would be ok. Otherwise no. It would not be fair to wish that on our junior colleagues. We all came to one of the big 4 for a benchmark in terms of pay. A 175 is not the benchmark we joined swa for. Anyway, all speculation for now without any management comments. The only thing said last year by Bob was about a long range airplane for intl destinations that is being considered.

A Smaller fleet means less open time for us on 737, less money to be made. According to the latest Swapa podcast the talk is more focused on a WB, i hope they are right.

Originally Posted by RJSAviator76
Precisely... I don't know why we're all hung up on pay scale of a smaller plane, but if it's something much smaller like 175... so what? So this plane goes junior then... I'm sure every Delta or United pilot would love to be on a Dreamliner/A350 pay scale, but unfortunately, some are flying "the best jet ever made" (717 according to some Trannies, for all the new guys here), others are flying B737 or A320's and they're all on different scales are they not? I'd much rather have our junior pilots fly the lower paying airplane and have seniority dictate who flies what than outsource the flying and potentially putting their livelihoods at risk.
Reply
Old 04-10-2026 | 03:04 PM
  #177  
Gets Weekend Reserve
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,275
Likes: 270
From: B737CA
Default

Originally Posted by hoover
what if they say the 175 will only be in Dallas and they will severely chop the 737 that flies out of the Dallas bid packet, will it be a jr plane then?
The small plane won't be in all bases so one cant say itll only affect jr people.
unless guys woth 20 yrs here now have to commute to stay on the better paying plane because there base no longer flies it.
Just like the legacies I guess
Let's take it a step further. Suppose they indeed severely chop the 737 flying that flies out of the Dallas bid packet, and it gets outsourced to be flown by pilots not on our seniority list. Seriously, we're not reinventing the wheel here. This actually happened industry-wide even though a bunch of our new FO's were in elementary school when the industry was in shambles and outsourcing decimated pilot careers. .

Having said that, I don't see the company ditching seats and capacity for more smaller gauge planes. Wall Street would kill them.

Originally Posted by MagicGoose
I would be surprised if anyone hired past 4 years would be fine to fly a lower paying jet. Won’t happen. Nobody joined swa to do regional flying at lower pay. If the difference is small such as for a DL guy on A220 vs 737 then would be ok. Otherwise no. It would not be fair to wish that on our junior colleagues. We all came to one of the big 4 for a benchmark in terms of pay. A 175 is not the benchmark we joined swa for. Anyway, all speculation for now without any management comments. The only thing said last year by Bob was about a long range airplane for intl destinations that is being considered.

A Smaller fleet means less open time for us on 737, less money to be made. According to the latest Swapa podcast the talk is more focused on a WB, i hope they are right.
Me too.

Having said that, we really need to learn from history and PRONTO as some of the comments here appear to be coming from the people who either forgot, or don't know the history and how outsourcing can really screw our collective careers much more so than having a slightly lower paying airframe on our property.
Reply
Old 04-10-2026 | 03:43 PM
  #178  
hoover's Avatar
At your mom's house
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,706
Likes: 472
From: cpt 737
Default

Originally Posted by RJSAviator76
Let's take it a step further. Suppose they indeed severely chop the 737 flying that flies out of the Dallas bid packet, and it gets outsourced to be flown by pilots not on our seniority list. Seriously, we're not reinventing the wheel here. This actually happened industry-wide even though a bunch of our new FO's were in elementary school when the industry was in shambles and outsourcing decimated pilot careers. .

Having said that, I don't see the company ditching seats and capacity for more smaller gauge planes. Wall Street would kill them.



Me too.

Having said that, we really need to learn from history and PRONTO as some of the comments here appear to be coming from the people who either forgot, or don't know the history and how outsourcing can really screw our collective careers much more so than having a slightly lower paying airframe on our property.
I never said having another company fly our tails.
I think everyone agrees thats a non starter
Reply
Old 04-10-2026 | 05:09 PM
  #179  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 764
Likes: 220
Default

Originally Posted by mulcher
Yet CAs don’t even get leading NB rates. Yeah JR drinks for free…NOT!
loser


……..
Reply
Old 04-10-2026 | 05:10 PM
  #180  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2023
Posts: 318
Likes: 21
Default

Originally Posted by hoover
I never said having another company fly our tails.
I think everyone agrees thats a non starter
they would use smaller planes for smaller cities that a 737 wouldn’t allow and wouldn’t really cabotage any of it. If anything it would grow the base. Let’s not make easy hard.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jetliner1526
JetBlue
290
08-09-2018 08:52 AM
ERJ135
Major
95
02-05-2018 09:14 AM
jetliner1526
JetBlue
30
03-11-2016 06:55 AM
benzoate
Major
271
05-10-2013 10:34 AM
RockBottom
Major
1
04-21-2006 04:02 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices