Search

Notices

Spirit of NKS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-2015 | 11:53 AM
  #11931  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JoeyMeatballs
Maybe I'm missing something but I was not under the impression that the majority Rep was in favor of this?

I'm not even sure Jason came out and specifically stated he was in favor?
Hey balls, yes he is very much in favor of this to the extent when you ask him about it he says " this is what the fll guys want and I agree"

This whole issue is a joke
Old 05-29-2015 | 12:00 PM
  #11932  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Default

Everyone relax. They have to at least persue it. The 109 pilots passed the resolution and the reps are required to represent them. If the results of the survey showed the group as a whole isn't interested it will die on the vine but they have to at least take these steps for the 109 captains.

You have to remember that you are dealing with a group of guys trained to pick up lots of open time because it was 150%. They then created lifestyles around that and when 150% wheat away they had to pick up even more open time. Also the out of base captains that life in FLL have commuting at stake so they stalk open time and are very very quick to grab anything that comes open so even the FLL captains that want to make simple swaps cannot because there is nothing left to trade with. This also creates more red days on the other bases so because guys that live in FLL are dropping their lines to pick up in FLL. This makes it harder for the guys that actually live in those other bases to drop or make swaps that move days later in the month.

I'm for out of base trading but just letting you know why this resolution existed. And all of those on here saying they oppose it must not be fll based because I saw none of you at the meeting where this thing got passed by an overwhelming margin.

Also I don't think the 109 reps actually support the resolution because one is a long distance driver that probably doesn't pick up much open time and the other is actually a captain in another base and probably doing exactly what this resolution is trying to limit. However, they are required to represent the pilots of 109 and that's what they are doing. It may only be a small portion of 109 that actually favors this thing but they were the only ones that cared enough to show up. Where were the rest of you?

Last edited by Qotsaautopilot; 05-29-2015 at 12:41 PM.
Old 05-29-2015 | 12:09 PM
  #11933  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,385
Likes: 0
From: Airplane
Default

I know it's not every month, but there are plenty of Open Time trips on the CA side for June that no one seems to be picking up.
Old 05-29-2015 | 12:36 PM
  #11934  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Lobaeux
I know it's not every month, but there are plenty of Open Time trips on the CA side for June that no one seems to be picking up.
June July and August are typically exceptions to the other 9 months of the year.
Old 05-29-2015 | 12:50 PM
  #11935  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Default

Again I don't support the resolution at all but in fairness it's not aimed at stopping out of base pickups it's seeking to limit it by giving in base pilots first crack. I know some other airlines don't award open time first come first serve but have multiple "close outs" during the day and award based on seniority and by domicile. We could go to something like open time awards every 4 hrs and still be first come first based on the time of the request but by only awarding it to an out of base pilot if no in base pilots requested it in the 4 hour period. If a few did it would go to the first in base guy that made the request to honor first come first serve

Or simply award it instantly if requested by and in base pilot but if an out of base guy requests it remains in opentime for at least 4 hours. If the trip has been in open time for 4:01 and has no requests for it it would go to any pilot system wide when a request is made.

Also the trade limiting after 12:00pm two days prior is already in the contract and is now being enforced because FLL captains were standing available during that cutoff period and out of base pilots were calling and getting trips when you had guys on the available list. That is illegal per the contract so those captains filed grievances and won and they got paid for those trips too. I hate it too because you can't even trade day for day inside that period which severely limits qol but CH and co only care about themselves and filed grievances not thinking about how it affects even their in base brethren from making swaps. A serial contract violator filing a grievance for contract compliance is pure insanity but that's what happend.

Last edited by Qotsaautopilot; 05-29-2015 at 01:05 PM.
Old 05-29-2015 | 01:02 PM
  #11936  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
Again I don't support the resolution at all but in fairness it's not aimed at stopping out of base pickups it's seeking to limit it by giving in base pilots first crack. I know some other airlines don't award open time first come first serve but have multiple "close outs" during the day and award based on seniority and by domicile. We could go to something like open time awards every 4 hrs and still be first come first based on the time of the request but by only awarding it to an out of base pilot if no in base pilots requested it in the 4 hour period. If a few did it would go to the first in base guy that made the request to honor first come first serve

Well. I for 1 hope it that it's fate is swift. Also I wish that CH and the rest of the little piggies that picked up OT well above and beyond guarantee with fellow aviators on furlough, are severely affected by its the non passage. Maybe then they can feel a little pain like we did on furlough. She's a liar and a cheat. She picks up out of base all the time.
Old 05-29-2015 | 01:34 PM
  #11937  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Default

I wish she would just quit. I would hope for a firing but she would sue and get her job back. Maybe a non-life-threatening issue that causes a loss of medical while we have this terrible LTD. Yeah that.
Old 05-29-2015 | 01:35 PM
  #11938  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,385
Likes: 0
From: Airplane
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
June July and August are typically exceptions to the other 9 months of the year.
That's why I said, it's not every month. But, still seems there's plenty of Open Time for June. I agree with your logic though.
Old 05-29-2015 | 01:54 PM
  #11939  
Jett i son's Avatar
escaped
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Default

The only chance for this to pass, is for folks who are really not affected to abstain from voting.
The ultra senior FLL CA crowd will be voting passionately on this!
Old 05-29-2015 | 02:00 PM
  #11940  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Default

Absolutely. They showed up in force at the last lec meeting with proxies too from all their friends that couldn't make it. The rest of the base chose not to participate. Sad.

Most of them are actually great guy to fly and hang with but they are quite passionate about this issue to claim ownership of something that isn't really theirs
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cs757200
Major
11
08-27-2011 11:55 AM
Splanky
Major
7
05-16-2009 06:13 PM
shiftwork
Major
440
03-18-2009 05:05 PM
DWN3GRN
Major
16
09-02-2008 04:11 PM
A320Flyer
Major
5
09-02-2008 04:05 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices