Spirit of NKS
#8871
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 320
Indeed. I plan only for the absolute worst, that way anything even slightly better is a major success.
#8872
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Posts: 2,918
No, just delayed a tad.
If you went around various OA HDQs into the depths where the real strategy/planning happens you wouldnt find much hate, but there would be a massive consensus that JetBlue has been one of the top strategically misguided companies in this business from a financial standpoint if one excludes VX. The financials prove it, there is no bias in numbers. Frankly, if you're doing the flying 0% of it is your fault and 100% of it lies in a NYC building by the water.
Also, its an average of just over 33 inches not 32. You probably should have that number down, every inch counts when it comes down to CASM...or when you are over 6ft tall
If you went around various OA HDQs into the depths where the real strategy/planning happens you wouldnt find much hate, but there would be a massive consensus that JetBlue has been one of the top strategically misguided companies in this business from a financial standpoint if one excludes VX. The financials prove it, there is no bias in numbers. Frankly, if you're doing the flying 0% of it is your fault and 100% of it lies in a NYC building by the water.
Also, its an average of just over 33 inches not 32. You probably should have that number down, every inch counts when it comes down to CASM...or when you are over 6ft tall
And as mismanaged as it was it still made money
The question is how much can they make if they get everything together?
#8873
Banned
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
There is no Spirit envy.
I don't understand the JetBlue bashing.
The company needed to change some things and we are doing just that. Some of you Spirit boys forget what goes up can come right back down, your 2 year upgrades won't last forever and things can change and stagnate at anytime. If this works JetBlue will be a much stronger airline and we really will be "following" you into the Carribean. Anyway we are all just pilots, and I am glad you guys are doing well but remember it can all change tomorrow.
Don't pick up those stones just yet.
I don't understand the JetBlue bashing.
The company needed to change some things and we are doing just that. Some of you Spirit boys forget what goes up can come right back down, your 2 year upgrades won't last forever and things can change and stagnate at anytime. If this works JetBlue will be a much stronger airline and we really will be "following" you into the Carribean. Anyway we are all just pilots, and I am glad you guys are doing well but remember it can all change tomorrow.
Don't pick up those stones just yet.
Either way I think Jetblue would be stupid for not trying to increase their profits, the question is, what exactly is JetBlues business model? Is it LCC, quasi-legacy?, little bit of both? One thing I admire about Spirit is they know exactly what the model/plan is and that's a good thing, seems like JetBlue is trying to do both, maybe it will work, maybe it won't but it seems they are moving away from what made them so popular to begin with. Of course losing money to "stay true" to your roots doesn't make sense either.............
Last edited by JoeyMeatballs; 11-20-2014 at 08:09 AM.
#8874
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
Not much. As in any case there's always two sides of the story and then somewhere in the middle is the truth. This was just one side so there are pieces of the puzzle missing. There is nothing "propoganda" about newhire pay. Typically in an employment-separation lawsuit the lawyer has to fight for current and back-pay. They have to list what he was making.
#8875
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Posts: 2,918
It's not a two year upgrade, it's 2.5 years and we are well aware the music can and at some point will stop. Its just funny to see all these airlines do exactly what we are doing after criticizing us for doing it. hypocritical much?
Either way I think Jetblue would be stupid for not trying to increase their profits, the question is, what exactly is JetBlues business model? Is it LCC, quasi-legacy?, little bit of both? One thing I admire about Spirit is they know exactly what the model/plan is and that's a good thing, seems like JetBlue is trying to do both, maybe it will work, maybe it won't but it seems they are moving away from what made them so popular to begin with. Of course losing money to "stay true" to your roots doesn't make sense either.............
Either way I think Jetblue would be stupid for not trying to increase their profits, the question is, what exactly is JetBlues business model? Is it LCC, quasi-legacy?, little bit of both? One thing I admire about Spirit is they know exactly what the model/plan is and that's a good thing, seems like JetBlue is trying to do both, maybe it will work, maybe it won't but it seems they are moving away from what made them so popular to begin with. Of course losing money to "stay true" to your roots doesn't make sense either.............
We are right in the middle.
Not sure if that was the plan but due to the ULCCs coming along it puts us in the middle.
I think we know who we are, we just need to change a few things
adapt or die.
Like I said in the other post we have made money without this but we were weak if this works you will be looking at a much stronger JetBlue who is moving much of its flying to FLL.
That could be a problem for other airlines.
We still have the best Econ section so I guess we will see how it all works.
In the end the passangers will decide.
When we go with charging for drinks, snacks, carry ons, boarding passes, take out the tv's and go with non reclining seats than we will be hyprocritical.
#8876
Banned
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: A-320
Posts: 784
Spirit is not competing with jet blue for passengers. Or anyone else for that matter, save Allegiant. There's room for both and I believe both will find success. As long as there are different financial classes of flyers, so to will there be a need for both types of airlines.
#8877
We are right in the middle.
Not sure if that was the plan but due to the ULCCs coming along it puts us in the middle.
I think we know who we are, we just need to change a few things
adapt or die.
Like I said in the other post we have made money without this but we were weak if this works you will be looking at a much stronger JetBlue who is moving much of its flying to FLL.
That could be a problem for other airlines.
We still have the best Econ section so I guess we will see how it all works.
In the end the passangers will decide.
When we go with charging for drinks, snacks, carry ons, boarding passes, take out the tv's and go with non reclining seats than we will be hyprocritical.
Not sure if that was the plan but due to the ULCCs coming along it puts us in the middle.
I think we know who we are, we just need to change a few things
adapt or die.
Like I said in the other post we have made money without this but we were weak if this works you will be looking at a much stronger JetBlue who is moving much of its flying to FLL.
That could be a problem for other airlines.
We still have the best Econ section so I guess we will see how it all works.
In the end the passangers will decide.
When we go with charging for drinks, snacks, carry ons, boarding passes, take out the tv's and go with non reclining seats than we will be hyprocritical.
Have a smurfy day...
#8878
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Posts: 2,918
I guess we will see.
Must be nice to work for a perfect airline.
#8879
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Posts: 123
And as mismanaged as it was it still made money
The question is how much can they make if they get everything together?
The question is how much can they make if they get everything together?
You forgot to point out that absolute profits above a break-even line when not taking into account ratios and percentages in the last few years has been childishly easy for everyone flying this side of a RJ due to capacity discipline installed, especially by the big 4, because of fuel prices. Now that fuel is unraveling and market share is becoming relevant again (not to NK/F9 of course) and the easy profits will be harder and harder to come by as irrational capacity decisions are made yet again.
Again, I think anyone with half a brain will tell you that this is a step in the right direction financially for blue. However, the question remains to be seen if blue can go the distance and start walking there and find some sort of true niche in the market. Id almost argue half of this depends on what SWA does, their choices or lack there of actually could determine which way the pendulum swings.
Like I said in the other post we have made money without this but we were weak if this works you will be looking at a much stronger JetBlue who is moving much of its flying to FLL.
That could be a problem for other airlines.
That could be a problem for other airlines.
Spirit is not competing with jet blue for passengers. Or anyone else for that matter, save Allegiant. There's room for both and I believe both will find success. As long as there are different financial classes of flyers, so to will there be a need for both types of airlines.
#8880
Banned
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
So basically cheap gas will once again lead to overcapacity and bankruptcy
Gotta love this industry!
Gotta love this industry!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post