Search

Notices

Spirit of NKS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-20-2014 | 08:20 AM
  #8881  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,247
Likes: 45
From: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Default

Originally Posted by JoeyMeatballs
It's not a two year upgrade, it's 2.5 years and we are well aware the music can and at some point will stop. Its just funny to see all these airlines do exactly what we are doing after criticizing us for doing it. hypocritical much?

Either way I think Jetblue would be stupid for not trying to increase their profits, the question is, what exactly is JetBlues business model? Is it LCC, quasi-legacy?, little bit of both? One thing I admire about Spirit is they know exactly what the model/plan is and that's a good thing, seems like JetBlue is trying to do both, maybe it will work, maybe it won't but it seems they are moving away from what made them so popular to begin with. Of course losing money to "stay true" to your roots doesn't make sense either.............


We are right in the middle.
Not sure if that was the plan but due to the ULCCs coming along it puts us in the middle.
I think we know who we are, we just need to change a few things
adapt or die.
Like I said in the other post we have made money without this but we were weak if this works you will be looking at a much stronger JetBlue who is moving much of its flying to FLL.
That could be a problem for other airlines.
We still have the best Econ section so I guess we will see how it all works.
In the end the passangers will decide.

When we go with charging for drinks, snacks, carry ons, boarding passes, take out the tv's and go with non reclining seats than we will be hyprocritical.
Old 11-20-2014 | 08:38 AM
  #8882  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: A-320
Default

Spirit is not competing with jet blue for passengers. Or anyone else for that matter, save Allegiant. There's room for both and I believe both will find success. As long as there are different financial classes of flyers, so to will there be a need for both types of airlines.
Old 11-20-2014 | 09:20 AM
  #8883  
Plane Ramrod's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by pilotpayne
We are right in the middle.
Not sure if that was the plan but due to the ULCCs coming along it puts us in the middle.
I think we know who we are, we just need to change a few things
adapt or die.
Like I said in the other post we have made money without this but we were weak if this works you will be looking at a much stronger JetBlue who is moving much of its flying to FLL.
That could be a problem for other airlines.
We still have the best Econ section so I guess we will see how it all works.
In the end the passangers will decide.

When we go with charging for drinks, snacks, carry ons, boarding passes, take out the tv's and go with non reclining seats than we will be hyprocritical.
I think your management just ran out of room to store all the seats you ripped out of the mint planes High density / low density; all inclusive / a la cart. Feels like you're taking a ride on the bi-polar coaster.

Have a smurfy day...
Old 11-20-2014 | 10:13 AM
  #8884  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,247
Likes: 45
From: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Default

Originally Posted by Plane Ramrod
I think your management just ran out of room to store all the seats you ripped out of the mint planes High density / low density; all inclusive / a la cart. Feels like you're taking a ride on the bi-polar coaster.

Have a smurfy day...


I guess we will see.
Must be nice to work for a perfect airline.
Old 11-20-2014 | 10:55 AM
  #8885  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Default

And as mismanaged as it was it still made money
The question is how much can they make if they get everything together?
A lot of money. However, this is true for just about every carrier with United at the top of the pile.

You forgot to point out that absolute profits above a break-even line when not taking into account ratios and percentages in the last few years has been childishly easy for everyone flying this side of a RJ due to capacity discipline installed, especially by the big 4, because of fuel prices. Now that fuel is unraveling and market share is becoming relevant again (not to NK/F9 of course) and the easy profits will be harder and harder to come by as irrational capacity decisions are made yet again.

Again, I think anyone with half a brain will tell you that this is a step in the right direction financially for blue. However, the question remains to be seen if blue can go the distance and start walking there and find some sort of true niche in the market. Id almost argue half of this depends on what SWA does, their choices or lack there of actually could determine which way the pendulum swings.

Like I said in the other post we have made money without this but we were weak if this works you will be looking at a much stronger JetBlue who is moving much of its flying to FLL.
That could be a problem for other airlines.
Blue flying isnt moving flying to FLL, capacity is just being added there. Big difference.

Spirit is not competing with jet blue for passengers. Or anyone else for that matter, save Allegiant. There's room for both and I believe both will find success. As long as there are different financial classes of flyers, so to will there be a need for both types of airlines.
Not entirely true. We compete with every OA for passengers, its just that the % is not as large as other OAs vs. other OAs. Let me add the disclaimer that with every schedule change that F9 does we are competing more and more with them for exactly the same passenger.
Old 11-20-2014 | 11:46 AM
  #8886  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 6,929
Likes: 0
From: A-320
Default

So basically cheap gas will once again lead to overcapacity and bankruptcy

Gotta love this industry!
Old 11-20-2014 | 11:55 AM
  #8887  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Default

Thats the way its been since 1978
Old 11-20-2014 | 12:20 PM
  #8888  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,247
Likes: 45
From: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Default

Originally Posted by RP4242
A lot of money. However, this is true for just about every carrier with United at the top of the pile.

You forgot to point out that absolute profits above a break-even line when not taking into account ratios and percentages in the last few years has been childishly easy for everyone flying this side of a RJ due to capacity discipline installed, especially by the big 4, because of fuel prices. Now that fuel is unraveling and market share is becoming relevant again (not to NK/F9 of course) and the easy profits will be harder and harder to come by as irrational capacity decisions are made yet again.

Again, I think anyone with half a brain will tell you that this is a step in the right direction financially for blue. However, the question remains to be seen if blue can go the distance and start walking there and find some sort of true niche in the market. Id almost argue half of this depends on what SWA does, their choices or lack there of actually could determine which way the pendulum swings.



Blue flying isnt moving flying to FLL, capacity is just being added there. Big difference.



Not entirely true. We compete with every OA for passengers, its just that the % is not as large as other OAs vs. other OAs. Let me add the disclaimer that with every schedule change that F9 does we are competing more and more with them for exactly the same passenger.

Yes adding capacity in Fll....you are correct.
Almost all future growth will be there and a little left for Boston.
Old 11-20-2014 | 12:33 PM
  #8889  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: A-320
Default

Ah yes. Forgot about F9. That will be interesting to see in the coming years. Real competition at some point in sure. Crazy industry
Old 11-20-2014 | 12:52 PM
  #8890  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RonnyK320
I'm using / and it's working. I tried \ and it didn't work.

I can't get the mail.spirit site to load. Anyone else having this problem? I'm copy/pasting the site address from the RA site.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cs757200
Major
11
08-27-2011 11:55 AM
Splanky
Major
7
05-16-2009 06:13 PM
shiftwork
Major
440
03-18-2009 05:05 PM
DWN3GRN
Major
16
09-02-2008 04:11 PM
A320Flyer
Major
5
09-02-2008 04:05 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices