Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Retired Airlines > Spirit
Spirit of NKS, Part III >

Spirit of NKS, Part III

Search

Notices

Spirit of NKS, Part III

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-14-2016 | 11:53 AM
  #311  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Behind your mom/wife/girlfriend
Default

Originally Posted by dn_wisconsin
It is crewplan. Read the cover page on the bid packets. It tell you who to send it to and I believe it has to be within 24 hours of when the bids close. Lots of good info in the first few pages of the bid packet.
You're right! Lots of great info on that first page just not what I needed as far as explaining who to email. Albeit the email is listed but I had a specific question for those who came before.

Thanks for your knowledge!
Old 12-14-2016 | 03:08 PM
  #312  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gatorbird
First, let me apologize for the unprofessional and immature comments made by a very few of my co-workers. In their vitriol toward our current negotiation status it appears a few of us have forgotten how to be big girls and boys and have taken to unnecessary actions and name-calling. While the morale currently is the lowest I've witnessed in my 10 years here (strike included), the immaturity and subsequent actions by these individuals do not represent the majority of our pilot group and I'm ashamed that these few have chosen to air their frustrations in such a public way.

To your questions: it looks like the latest bid snapshot has the junior LAS FO slot going to someone with a August/September hire date. All bases are usually attainable within 6 months as guys chase the upgrade. As for the interview/hire, HR is having trouble filling classes. Some interview days all applicants are hired just to get a warm body in the slot. You do the math.

What my colleagues were trying to say was, based on our view within, Spirit may not be "better than your regional". The rates speak for themselves, morale stinks and our QOL provisions that our management loves to point out to potential candidates (and attempt to use against us in earnings calls) are overrated. The 4-day off provision doesn't look as good in a junior line in between 5 or 6-days-on noncommutable sequences, our transition conflict language mainly benefits only the most senior and our red/green language that allows for drops does one no good if they can't afford to do so. Our MEC has clearly indicated that an agreement is not expected any time soon. Morale is worse than I believe it's ever been, strike included, the difference being we were a nearly-bankrupt dumpy airline then but a highly-profitable, Wall St darling growth airline now that stubbornly refuses to recognize the value of it's pilot group and compensate us accordingly.

To you guys posting crap you shouldn't be: cool it. You've already had a Professional Standards email sent out on your behalf and recently had a thread closed. You're becoming what you want to keep Spirit from becoming. Stop making us look bad and leave the internet bully crap to someone else.
I would agree that as a body of work the work rules are about industry standard. However, four days off can be captured another way like southwest does with a min 15/16. Without that or the current 4 (5) days off we'd all be working 18hr trips and 13 day off lines.

You are right about the transition conflict language except that those that don't benefit directly benefit indirectly because it's a staffing inefficiency that requires more pilots which means every one holds a better line or a better base or a captain seat when they wouldn't without the conflict language.

Red green is by far the most valuable qol rule bar none! Is not just about dropping for no money. It's about swapping for different days. Getting that one really important day off you didn't get on your line and moving the money to a different day. Also for those that do want to drop it creates another staffing inefficiency like I mentioned above which is good for everyone. Whatever sec 25 modes into in a TA, changing red green is a non starter IMO.
Old 12-14-2016 | 03:27 PM
  #313  
Plane Ramrod's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Qotsaautopilot
I would agree that as a body of work the work rules are about industry standard. However, four days off can be captured another way like southwest does with a min 15/16. Without that or the current 4 (5) days off we'd all be working 18hr trips and 13 day off lines.

You are right about the transition conflict language except that those that don't benefit directly benefit indirectly because it's a staffing inefficiency that requires more pilots which means every one holds a better line or a better base or a captain seat when they wouldn't without the conflict language.

Red green is by far the most valuable qol rule bar none! Is not just about dropping for no money. It's about swapping for different days. Getting that one really important day off you didn't get on your line and moving the money to a different day. Also for those that do want to drop it creates another staffing inefficiency like I mentioned above which is good for everyone. Whatever sec 25 modes into in a TA, changing red green is a non starter IMO.
Since the min coverage is set by the company based on information neither us nor the mec has access to, I disagree on the greatness of the red/green system. Three arbitrations helped, but it could go south pdq... like if they start feeling staffing pressure.
Old 12-14-2016 | 03:36 PM
  #314  
Plane Ramrod's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
Default

In other news, glad the mec test group had no problems with sum total. Wonder if their test group had the low memory ipad version some of us serfs are packing. Guess the 25 hours I spent crashing and restarting were all in my head. Making more recurrent happen.
Old 12-14-2016 | 03:46 PM
  #315  
NJGov's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 366
Likes: 37
From: A319/321 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Plane Ramrod
Since the min coverage is set by the company based on information neither us nor the mec has access to, I disagree on the greatness of the red/green system. Three arbitrations helped, but it could go south pdq... like if they start feeling staffing pressure.
Doesn't it have to be set by prior experience? As I understand it they can't just set it at an arbitrary number.
Old 12-14-2016 | 04:10 PM
  #316  
Chimpy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,877
Likes: 199
Default

Looks like another NEO with an issue. Air return to ORD

http://avherald.com/h?article=4a21890f&opt=0
Old 12-14-2016 | 04:26 PM
  #317  
Plane Ramrod's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NJGov
Doesn't it have to be set by prior experience? As I understand it they can't just set it at an arbitrary number.
Yes, prior experience... what exactly does that mean? Nothing as far as I understand it. It's the ultimate "to the maximum extent possible", or "best effort."
Old 12-14-2016 | 04:27 PM
  #318  
Chimpy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,877
Likes: 199
Default

Originally Posted by Plane Ramrod
Yes, prior experience... what exactly does that mean? Nothing as far as I understand it. It's the ultimate "to the maximum extent possible", or "best effort."
Perhaps if they just made eveythIn red we'd go on a Staus Quo Strike
Old 12-14-2016 | 05:03 PM
  #319  
Plane Ramrod's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Chimpy
Perhaps if they just made eveythIn red we'd go on a Staus Quo Strike
Yeah, I don't think that would be considered a major disagreement. No strike for you!
Old 12-14-2016 | 06:30 PM
  #320  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Chimpy
Perhaps if they just made eveythIn red we'd go on a Staus Quo Strike
And then they'd switch it back to green and we'd be right back at status quo and strike over and still no contract.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trigg41
Cargo
160
08-04-2014 12:36 AM
vandypilot
Major
14
02-17-2012 08:09 AM
TonyWilliams
Cargo
257
09-09-2010 04:31 PM
shiftwork
Major
440
03-18-2009 05:05 PM
eprn1n2
Aviation Law
3
12-22-2008 06:36 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices