WB Reserve
#25
Years on property is a skewed way to view seniority because hiring rates fluctuate so much over time. There are spots on the seniority list where a couple hundred numbers can represent a years long disparity in hire dates, whereas at the current bottom end of the seniority list it represents only a couple of weeks.
6,000 is a long time pre-merger, so the hire date would depend on which legacy carrier the person started at. Someone in that seniority band can certainly come up with the longevity numbers, but it probably paints a much more accurate picture to think of it as around 45% seniority.
6,000 is a long time pre-merger, so the hire date would depend on which legacy carrier the person started at. Someone in that seniority band can certainly come up with the longevity numbers, but it probably paints a much more accurate picture to think of it as around 45% seniority.
#26
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
#29
Years on property is a skewed way to view seniority because hiring rates fluctuate so much over time. There are spots on the seniority list where a couple hundred numbers can represent a years long disparity in hire dates, whereas at the current bottom end of the seniority list it represents only a couple of weeks.
6,000 is a long time pre-merger, so the hire date would depend on which legacy carrier the person started at. Someone in that seniority band can certainly come up with the longevity numbers, but it probably paints a much more accurate picture to think of it as around 45% seniority.
6,000 is a long time pre-merger, so the hire date would depend on which legacy carrier the person started at. Someone in that seniority band can certainly come up with the longevity numbers, but it probably paints a much more accurate picture to think of it as around 45% seniority.
#30
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 671
Likes: 11
From: B767 Captain
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




