Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > United
Is It The Pay Houston ? >

Is It The Pay Houston ?

Search
Notices

Is It The Pay Houston ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-28-2016, 12:18 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,138
Default

Originally Posted by sleeves View Post
Keep up your divisive BS. It is helping so much.
Would United be Stronger if Divided? - TheStreet
Horrible article. In one paragraph they say United suffers because they don't have a hub in the middle of the country, apparently ORD doesn't count, so they have longer stage lengths. Also United has no presence in the south east making connections to florida hard. Then in the very next paragraph they say they should close DEN, and IAD.......That makes the situation that they said is bad worse! These analysts are idiots.
MasterOfPuppets is offline  
Old 04-28-2016, 12:25 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
bigfatdaddy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 862
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets View Post
Horrible article. In one paragraph they say United suffers because they don't have a hub in the middle of the country, apparently ORD doesn't count, so they have longer stage lengths. Also United has no presence in the south east making connections to florida hard. Then in the very next paragraph they say they should close DEN, and IAD.......That makes the situation that they said is bad worse! These analysts are idiots.
Agree completely....another opinion piece by the unqualified
bigfatdaddy is offline  
Old 04-28-2016, 04:52 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 737 fo
Posts: 908
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets View Post
Horrible article. In one paragraph they say United suffers because they don't have a hub in the middle of the country, apparently ORD doesn't count, so they have longer stage lengths. Also United has no presence in the south east making connections to florida hard. Then in the very next paragraph they say they should close DEN, and IAD.......That makes the situation that they said is bad worse! These analysts are idiots.
I do not disagree with you. The problem is that this is being brought up on earnings calls and talked about by investors. As we have seen lately investors do have a seat at the table and their views get heard. I think we better start working together before someone starts believing stuff like this is the fix.
sleeves is offline  
Old 04-29-2016, 04:30 AM
  #24  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: Tom’s Whipping boy.
Posts: 1,182
Default

Originally Posted by ReadyRsv View Post
Maybe the captain of record on those trips isn't very friendly.

Guess I should have specified that the open trips every day were on the captains side. Don't know anything about the FO's.

Didn't take long for this discussions to deteriorate into some juvenile parochial scat slinging. You monkeys can go away- not interested in hearing your dribble.

Yes, they did used to be 3 day trips- very productive but due to part 171 they are now 4 day. That does not explain the S.A. trips that change only 1 or two time zones and still fit within the 171 limits.

Just learned from an FO who I recently flew with said the 767-300 pay was negotiated as it is because the company told the negotiating committee that they were going away soon after the UPA.. This is someone who should know.

Wow, I have a bridge to sell too.

But hey, we negotiated the big bucks for the A-380! It'll be here any day right?

Just wondering if some of that 380 pay might have been captured to pay wide body rates on an existing wide body.
BMEP100 is offline  
Old 04-29-2016, 06:01 AM
  #25  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 846
Default

Originally Posted by BMEP100 View Post
Guess I should have specified that the open trips every day were on the captains side. Don't know anything about the FO's.

Didn't take long for this discussions to deteriorate into some juvenile parochial scat slinging. You monkeys can go away- not interested in hearing your dribble.

Yes, they did used to be 3 day trips- very productive but due to part 171 they are now 4 day. That does not explain the S.A. trips that change only 1 or two time zones and still fit within the 171 limits.

Just learned from an FO who I recently flew with said the 767-300 pay was negotiated as it is because the company told the negotiating committee that they were going away soon after the UPA.. This is someone who should know.

Wow, I have a bridge to sell too.

But hey, we negotiated the big bucks for the A-380! It'll be here any day right?

Just wondering if some of that 380 pay might have been captured to pay wide body rates on an existing wide body.

Originally Posted by AllenAllert View Post
Because Jay Pierce tried to make his side look more like a big airline and equivalent to the UAL side for senority integration. The UAL side accepted it to stop the JP and JS carnage to the UAL pilot seniority. Since then the combined pilot group agreed to a 2 year extension for a little raise instead of making meaningful changes to the contract.

Hence, not ALPA's fault - it's the pilots greed. Own up!
It may be scat but it's the way things happened. If the pilot in the know knew then he was part of the JP grand seniority grab. Quit trying to rewrite history and go back look at the information at the time. History doesn't lie but liars do.
AllenAllert is offline  
Old 04-29-2016, 07:46 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,083
Default

Originally Posted by AllenAllert View Post
It may be scat but it's the way things happened. If the pilot in the know knew then he was part of the JP grand seniority grab. Quit trying to rewrite history and go back look at the information at the time. History doesn't lie but liars do.
I think you're half right. If I remember correctly, the last CALALPA pre-merger contract proposal had the 764 in the highest pay band while the was 763 attached to the 762 and 753 in a lower band. The actual CAL pay bands at the time of the merger had all 767s in the highest pay band, while the 747 was banded with the 777 and all 757s and 767s were banded together at UAL.

I agree there was probably posturing by CALALPA in wanting to keep the 764 in the highest band. It had potential SLI implications and was a fleet flown by LCAL pilots and would remain so until after the SLI, so it made sense in looking out for their pilots they would attempt to keep it in the highest pay band. What you neglect to mention is UALALPA attempted to do the exact same thing with the 744, breaking it into its own, new, top paying rate, despite the fact it was banded to the 777 at the time of the merger.

Long story short, both sides did a lot of maneuvering that got us to where we are now and none of it matters anymore... except... we're hiring a lot of pilots who don't carry any legacy baggage and shouldn't be filled up with revisionist history.
XHooker is offline  
Old 04-29-2016, 07:59 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Hilltopper89's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: 737
Posts: 1,061
Default

Originally Posted by MasterOfPuppets View Post
Horrible article. In one paragraph they say United suffers because they don't have a hub in the middle of the country, apparently ORD doesn't count, so they have longer stage lengths. Also United has no presence in the south east making connections to florida hard. Then in the very next paragraph they say they should close DEN, and IAD.......That makes the situation that they said is bad worse! These analysts are idiots.
There was a good discussion recently in one of our publications about why we don't have a bigger presence in the southeast. It basically said it wasn't fiscally sound. More $$ to be made elsewhere.
Hilltopper89 is offline  
Old 04-30-2016, 07:43 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MasterOfPuppets's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: 787
Posts: 3,138
Default

Originally Posted by Hilltopper89 View Post
There was a good discussion recently in one of our publications about why we don't have a bigger presence in the southeast. It basically said it wasn't fiscally sound. More $$ to be made elsewhere.
I personally don't see a reason to compete with JB, NK, F9, DL, AA, AY on their own turf. I used to fly the 756 out of EWR we filled a 757 every hour on the hour to MCO, we're doing just fine.

Also even though IAH is not in the east it is way south, and a quick 2 hr flight over the gulf gets you anywhere in Florida you want to be. No reason to waste our resources and money getting crushed in an MCO base just to appease some suit on the outside.
MasterOfPuppets is offline  
Old 04-30-2016, 10:15 AM
  #29  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 34
Default

Originally Posted by AllenAllert View Post
Because Jay Pierce tried to make his side look more like a big airline and equivalent to the UAL side for senority integration. The UAL side accepted it to stop the JP and JS carnage to the UAL pilot seniority. Since then the combined pilot group agreed to a 2 year extension for a little raise instead of making meaningful changes to the contract.

Hence, not ALPA's fault - it's the pilots greed. Own up!
Hit the nail on the head. Pilots keep ratifying contracts with this kind of junk in them and fail to hold the negotiators through their reps' feet to the fire when they do it. Look in the mirror.
doober is offline  
Old 04-30-2016, 10:49 AM
  #30  
Moderate Moderator
 
UAL T38 Phlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Curator at Static Display
Posts: 5,681
Default

While we complain and berate that we should be "more like Delta," over in the Delta threads, they are complaining about:

-The new CEO hates pilots

-International flying is being outsourced to Joint Ventures and codeshares

-DAL will become a domestic feed for other International carriers

-They will all be flying Super-RJs

-Contract negotiations are at a standstill, and unlikely to be positive despite record profits

Grass always greener?
UAL T38 Phlyer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MikeF16
Delta
179
02-03-2016 08:22 PM
Schwanker
Delta
306
01-14-2016 11:09 AM
A321
American
89
01-28-2015 06:55 PM
Raidr17
Military
20
03-26-2014 12:45 PM
marlonmoneda1
Regional
82
02-13-2011 11:12 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices