Search
Notices

new TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-25-2022, 05:27 AM
  #121  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fightandflight's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 110
Default

Originally Posted by Section Eight View Post
The banana republic has spoken, we are all heretics for questioning their motives

notice how fast we put out “our” interpretation of the UAL TA? Why…

what is behind the tough “sell” we seem to be subjected to. A continuous barrage of “you must vote yes, we said so…..”

I’ve asked this question to many I’ve flown with this week, and friends in the ASC. Why would they agree to this! If you say “to keep them off the teamsters backs” I say…F em and let’s start now.
You obviously feel strongly about this, and I’m not going to sit here and say you are wrong. I feel as if the union is making every effort to address questions and concerns through the town halls and videos. So my question (to the group) after reading your opinion and many like this is: what exactly are you hoping for? There are 2 sides to a negotiation and our side has come to us with this. The angry memberships distaste for the EB is apparent, so we vote no and then…these same people they despise, who were so clueless they didn’t see what a terrible deal this was, start negotiating our next contract? And then, when we don’t have an agreement by the time this TA would have expired do we talk about how incompetent they are, or do we say they were right? Or worse, we do have an agreement, but it’s “industry standard” to some of the existing contracts, so we talk about how incompetent the EB is for failing to negotiate what we wanted when they told us the timing wasn’t right?

I think there is an advantage to waiting, the teamsters negotiation is certainly part of that, but I also think waiting until the dust settles on some of these other pilot contracts could be a huge factor. Whether you want to admit it or not, our contract has been ahead of the pack in most areas, it’s tough to negotiate that we deserve to be even further ahead. Profits, inflation - the brain is always looking for some sort of number to latch on to, but I really think the only one that will matter for our pilot group is where FedEx is compared to us when the negotiations start. I think the combo of momentum from the other contracts and the completion of the teamsters contract will make the timing right…but I also think that if I could predict the future I wouldn’t be working at UPS.

“When the gushing torrential water tosses stones pushing boulders, it is because of the force of its momentum. When the ferocious strike of an eagle, breaks the body of its prey, it is because of the timing of the strike. Thus the forces and momentum of the adept in warfare are so overwhelming and ferocious and his timing of engagement is precise and swift.”
-Sun Tzu

Last edited by fightandflight; 06-25-2022 at 05:57 AM.
fightandflight is offline  
Old 06-25-2022, 06:20 AM
  #122  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: DC-8 756/767
Posts: 1,144
Default

Originally Posted by Section Eight View Post
The banana republic has spoken, we are all heretics for questioning their motives

notice how fast we put out “our” interpretation of the UAL TA? Why…

what is behind the tough “sell” we seem to be subjected to. A continuous barrage of “you must vote yes, we said so…..”

I’ve asked this question to many I’ve flown with this week, and friends in the ASC. Why would they agree to this! If you say “to keep them off the teamsters backs” I say…F em and let’s start now.

I’m not happy that our “leadership” even entertained this, and I won’t apologize for that. We need to vote this down and get started, it won’t be long before other TA’s follow and we find ourselves at the END of the pack rather than leading it…won’t that be hilarious when we find some other TA follows this and we voted for the bottom of the barrel.

I’m not sure what we’re afraid of, but It bugs me that we are cowering to the fight. That in and of itself is troubling enough.


carry on….,
What should be more concerning is how many people I have come in contact here think PBS will improve our schedules.

Carry on….
UPSFO4LIFE is offline  
Old 06-25-2022, 06:53 AM
  #123  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 919
Default

Originally Posted by UPSFO4LIFE View Post
What should be more concerning is how many people I have come in contact here think PBS will improve our schedules.

Carry on….
That is truly terrifying…
flyguy23 is offline  
Old 06-25-2022, 08:47 AM
  #124  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 923
Default

Originally Posted by UPSFO4LIFE View Post
What should be more concerning is how many people I have come in contact here think PBS will improve our schedules.

Carry on….
I haven’t, in fact the opposite is my experience.
C2078 is offline  
Old 06-25-2022, 08:58 AM
  #125  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 923
Default

Originally Posted by Section Eight View Post

I’m not sure what we’re afraid of, but It bugs me that we are cowering to the fight. That in and of itself is troubling enough.

.,
This!!! Let’s giddy up. However, even if this TA is turned down, I still have full confidence in my EB, the two can be mutually inclusive.
C2078 is offline  
Old 06-25-2022, 09:09 AM
  #126  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 919
Default

Originally Posted by C2078 View Post
This!!! Let’s giddy up. However, even if this TA is turned down, I still have full confidence in my EB, the two can be mutually inclusive.

The EB is telling you there is no fight to be had for 2 years, yes or no. So either you believe them or you don’t. Pretty simple.
flyguy23 is offline  
Old 06-25-2022, 09:18 AM
  #127  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Posts: 923
Default

Originally Posted by flyguy23 View Post
The EB is telling you there is no fight to be had for 2 years, yes or no. So either you believe them or you don’t. Pretty simple.
I don’t, doesn’t mean I don’t trust them to negotiate the next CBA. I am just one vote.
C2078 is offline  
Old 06-25-2022, 01:09 PM
  #128  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2018
Posts: 22
Default

Originally Posted by Section Eight View Post
The banana republic has spoken, we are all heretics for questioning their motives

notice how fast we put out “our” interpretation of the UAL TA? Why…

what is behind the tough “sell” we seem to be subjected to. A continuous barrage of “you must vote yes, we said so…..”



I’m not happy that our “leadership” even entertained this, and I won’t apologize for that. We need to vote this down and get started, it won’t be long before other TA’s follow and we find ourselves at the END of the pack rather than leading it…won’t that be hilarious when we find some other TA follows this and we voted for the bottom of the barrel.

I’m not sure what we’re afraid of, but It bugs me that we are cowering to the fight. That in and of itself is troubling enough.


carry on….,
Our EB didn't provide an interpretation of the UA TA, but they did supply context.

Never has the EB said "you MUST vote yes...", they haven't even implied that. They've only laid out the choice as they see it, you may decide as you see fit. To refer to them as our "leadership" is an undeserved insult. They are the leadership we have chosen, and we have done very well under their guidance. You claim there is fear of a confrontation, but it takes the other party to show up for there to be a confrontation. They've made a reasonable case that this wouldn't occur if there were no TA. Too many of our number seem to think we negotiate in a marketplace vacuum.
Celeste3205 is offline  
Old 06-25-2022, 02:48 PM
  #129  
maxing the min/Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: 757
Posts: 1,356
Default

Originally Posted by Celeste3205 View Post
Our EB didn't provide an interpretation of the UA TA, but they did supply context.

Never has the EB said "you MUST vote yes...", they haven't even implied that. They've only laid out the choice as they see it, you may decide as you see fit. To refer to them as our "leadership" is an undeserved insult. They are the leadership we have chosen, and we have done very well under their guidance. You claim there is fear of a confrontation, but it takes the other party to show up for there to be a confrontation. They've made a reasonable case that this wouldn't occur if there were no TA. Too many of our number seem to think we negotiate in a marketplace vacuum.

There are so many givebacks in the UAL TA I don’t think its even worth comparing.
jetlaggy is offline  
Old 06-25-2022, 06:43 PM
  #130  
Occasional box hauler
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 1,684
Default

Originally Posted by jetlaggy View Post
There are so many givebacks in the UAL TA I don’t think its even worth comparing.
I believe UALPA will have already voted their TA up or down before we have to cast our votes. That will be an interesting data point. Right now I would say our extension looks significantly better than their new contract “improvements.” Unfortunately, the only way they can really push the bar higher for us to leverage in our negotiations is to reject this TA. However, it could be a couple years before they nail down a good replacement.
tnkrdrvr is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices