Search

Notices

New system bid

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-08-2022 | 11:49 AM
  #31  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2022
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by UPSFO4LIFE
Heard is might not be until January, waiting on ATL.
With FDX parking planes and the lingering rumor of the parking of our MD P&W's, ATL is trying to figure out lift requirements for 2023. So a Vacancy/Realighment Bid may be weeks away. FDX just stopped 23 domestic and 9 Intl. routes.
Reply
Old 11-09-2022 | 09:27 AM
  #32  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 2
From: DC-8 756/767
Default

Originally Posted by Spearfish
With FDX parking planes and the lingering rumor of the parking of our MD P&W's, ATL is trying to figure out lift requirements for 2023. So a Vacancy/Realighment Bid may be weeks away. FDX just stopped 23 domestic and 9 Intl. routes.
Another thing to consider is that FedEx was parking planes before Covid and my friend there said things a actually back to pre Covid numbers. I would not be surprised though to see a drastic MD reduction here next year. The recession is going to get much worse next year and you will probably see some of those effects here. Hope I’m wrong.
Reply
Old 11-09-2022 | 03:50 PM
  #33  
Joachim's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 786
Likes: 2
Default

My guess is that we’re going to replace MDs with 767s one for one as the lift requirements decreases post pandemic. Not as exciting as A350’s or 777x I know.
Reply
Old 11-09-2022 | 04:45 PM
  #34  
tnkrdrvr's Avatar
Living the SloBus life
Veteran: Air Force
5 Years
On Reserve
20 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,178
Likes: 92
Default

Originally Posted by Joachim
My guess is that we’re going to replace MDs with 767s one for one as the lift requirements decreases post pandemic. Not as exciting as A350’s or 777x I know.
Thats what I would put money on, but I hope you’re wrong.
Reply
Old 11-09-2022 | 05:05 PM
  #35  
Thread Starter
maxing the min/Moderator
20 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 21
From: 757
Default

The more airframes the better...any size
Reply
Old 11-09-2022 | 09:20 PM
  #36  
C17B74's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,607
Likes: 4
From: No Hats No Jackets No PAX
Default

Originally Posted by jetlaggy
The more airframes the better...any size
Totally agree, that’s my vote like everyone else’s at any outfit. If it’s just a replacement schedule as mentioned before than at least they are being replaced vs a loss. Maybe a loss in lift capability but still better than nothing coming on line. Soft landings tend to be preferred.
Reply
Old 11-10-2022 | 02:32 AM
  #37  
Captjim's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
From: MD11 Gear Jerk
Default

Originally Posted by Joachim
My guess is that we’re going to replace MDs with 767s one for one as the lift requirements decreases post pandemic. Not as exciting as A350’s or 777x I know.
Totally agree with your sentiment
Reply
Old 11-10-2022 | 08:47 AM
  #38  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 923
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by C17B74
Totally agree, that’s my vote like everyone else’s at any outfit. If it’s just a replacement schedule as mentioned before than at least they are being replaced vs a loss. Maybe a loss in lift capability but still better than nothing coming on line. Soft landings tend to be preferred.
Net zero is fine. From our perspective an airframe is an airframe, regardless who much it can carry, especially since the MD is doing very little international.
Reply
Old 11-10-2022 | 02:57 PM
  #39  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 163
Likes: 1
From: F/O
Default

The 76 can replace the MD 1:1 on probably 80-90% of our domestic flights. International is a different story. It will be interesting to see how it all plays out.
Reply
Old 11-10-2022 | 03:08 PM
  #40  
Thread Starter
maxing the min/Moderator
20 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 21
From: 757
Default

Originally Posted by Flybynight101
The 76 can replace the MD 1:1 on probably 80-90% of our domestic flights. International is a different story. It will be interesting to see how it all plays out.

Then let em use 2 767s…I can’t see the downside to that. 😉
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EWR73FO
United
67
02-25-2012 07:11 PM
EWRflyr
United
23
07-25-2011 09:23 AM
Roberto
Cargo
147
06-09-2008 04:31 PM
DLax85
Cargo
25
05-24-2008 07:27 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
17
08-20-2005 07:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices