Atlas Air Hiring
#9691
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 44
#9692
Thanks for the info. I was just curious since this will effect folks looking to move out of ANC and other bases since those hired prior to Jan 2013 be senior to many 747 FOs. I think the last class was about Jan 2013.
CaptainV: For those staying on the 767 and not moving do you think they're staying to wait for more seniority on the 747? It would seem their QoL for base preference and schedule would be much better if they remain on the 767 and a great deal of folks above them move over to the 747. In addition to that I find it interesting that there could be a few new hires on the 747 due to 767 folks remaining on the 767.
CaptainV: For those staying on the 767 and not moving do you think they're staying to wait for more seniority on the 747? It would seem their QoL for base preference and schedule would be much better if they remain on the 767 and a great deal of folks above them move over to the 747. In addition to that I find it interesting that there could be a few new hires on the 747 due to 767 folks remaining on the 767.
#9693
I know everyone in my spot is anxiously awaiting the call. I've reread the email 10 times to make sure I didn't miss anything. As far as I can see, I take the test, email a new resume to HR and email the NHPS form to the NHPS address. No need to call/email and make sure that all came in, right? 
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
#9694
New Hire
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: KC-135 Capt
I interviewed yesterday with 9 other gentlemen. HR told us that e-mails would be sent to candidates within 2 weeks. She told us that we would get 1 of 3 statements in that e-mail. 1. Hired immediately; 2. Pooled for a future class; or 3. Not interested
#9697
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 5,231
Likes: 65
Bit of a change, used to be either a FedEx or UPS letter. And contrary to urban legend, one place didn't mean a "yes" and other didn't mean a "no".
#9698
CaptainV: For those staying on the 767 and not moving do you think they're staying to wait for more seniority on the 747? It would seem their QoL for base preference and schedule would be much better if they remain on the 767 and a great deal of folks above them move over to the 747. In addition to that I find it interesting that there could be a few new hires on the 747 due to 767 folks remaining on the 767.
I prefer CVG because I hardly ever get schedule changes on DHL trips, and I still like short legs and lots of landings. I like having my first choice on my work footprint, training and vacations. After 3 years, we could be senior in ANC (not even if you paid me), 50% in HSV, bottom third in CVG, bottom 10% everywhere else, but can't hold IAH. Other than HSV/CVG, i don't see base seniority getting tons better.
Beyond a November 747 class, I don't think you'll see any new hires going to the 747 for a long while. And honestly, the company should offer the slots to the guys hired in Oct. 2011, we've put our time in.
#9699
Who cares when they run the vacancy bid; if our seatlock is expired before the announced training date shouldnt those be awarded the transition? For me, i love the seniority and schedule on the 767, but it is hard to pass up an extra $20k... Also, i live in Cincy so hoping DHL on the 747 wont be to bad!
Last edited by flyboy8272; 10-10-2014 at 05:51 PM. Reason: addl info
#9700
Maybe I'm misreading this, but under the CBA section 24.K.8 all seat locks are off if a new plane is announced. So you could jump to the 747 and then bid the 777 a few months later. Assuming that white elephant ever materializes.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




