Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
UPS Realignment/Displacement bid is out! >

UPS Realignment/Displacement bid is out!

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

UPS Realignment/Displacement bid is out!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-26-2009, 02:13 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: MD-11 F/O
Posts: 232
Default

Originally Posted by Roberto View Post
The number of created positions (103) in the Realignment Vacancy Bid is equal to the number of displaced positions in the Displacement Bid. With no increase in front seaters, this should be just a giant reshuffle.

There will be quite a few long-term no bidders in the remaining FE ranks, which will reduce the number of bidders, but not to the level of the front seaters, I think.
So... do you forecast junior F/Os in ANC going to the panel? bottom 100 on the list working F/E seat plus 40 over 65 on the panel for a total of 140 or so DC-8 F/Es?
cessnapilot is offline  
Old 01-26-2009, 02:29 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: looking for a bridge to sleep under in ANC
Posts: 180
Default

Originally Posted by cessnapilot View Post
So... do you forecast junior F/Os in ANC going to the panel? bottom 100 on the list working F/E seat plus 40 over 65 on the panel for a total of 140 or so DC-8 F/Es?
Bingo! Funny thing is that will be the 2nd move on the company's nickel! And......if they furlough the junior FE's in SDF then eventually recall them to ANC they would be on the hook for yet another move.
freightretriever is offline  
Old 01-26-2009, 02:47 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Vman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 1 ft out the door
Posts: 113
Default

Questions?

The crewmembers identified as excess have first pick for the vacancies? Can they also bid for anything their seniority will hold? If all vacancies are filled, will there still be a free for all?
Vman is offline  
Old 01-26-2009, 03:14 PM
  #24  
On Reserve
 
MoneyShot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: A-300/310 FO
Posts: 10
Default What you talkin' about Willis?

I work for that other cargo company and some good friends of mine tell me that UPS is still profitable. Not as profitable as in years past, but profitable nonetheless. It boggles my mind to hear even a whisper of the "F" word. It might be costing the company to keep some pilots around until things get better but it sure would be nice for them to show a little loyalty to a component that has made them so successful in the past. Oh well, guess some exec needs the 2009 version of the 911 Porsche because, really, who wants to own the 2008 anymore...
MoneyShot is offline  
Old 01-26-2009, 03:18 PM
  #25  
New ride...
 
1800 RVR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Posts: 534
Default

Originally Posted by Vman View Post
Questions?

The crewmembers identified as excess have first pick for the vacancies? Can they also bid for anything their seniority will hold? If all vacancies are filled, will there still be a free for all?

Easy way to look at this: for the realignment, anyone can bid on the open vacancies. Seniority rules. However, these awards may not be final, because now comes the displacement portion. Those that are left that didn't "realign" themselves, will now be displaced into whatever seat they bid for and can hold via seniority. Those that are pushed out of the bottom of their list will now bump someone junior to them in whatever airplane, etc. I'm not going to get into the whole "there are only so many recurring vacancies created from an original vacancy" etc. part of the contract. Roberto has the knowledge of that part of the contract.
1800 RVR is offline  
Old 01-26-2009, 03:51 PM
  #26  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 540
Default

Originally Posted by 1800 RVR View Post
Easy way to look at this: for the realignment, anyone can bid on the open vacancies. Seniority rules. However, these awards may not be final, because now comes the displacement portion. Those that are left that didn't "realign" themselves, will now be displaced into whatever seat they bid for and can hold via seniority. Those that are pushed out of the bottom of their list will now bump someone junior to them in whatever airplane, etc. I'm not going to get into the whole "there are only so many recurring vacancies created from an original vacancy" etc. part of the contract. Roberto has the knowledge of that part of the contract.
RVR,
Correct me if I'm wrong but the math will go something like this: Add the number of guys who bid out of the back of the Ocho combined with differences between vacancies and displacements and you have the amount of guys who will eventually get displaced out of ANC to the panel.
Example 1: 10 more vacancies than displacements, plus 25 back seaters move forward will result in 15 guys eventually getting displaced from ANC to join the disgruntled DC8 F/Es.
Example 2: 10 less vacancies than displacements, plus 25 back seaters move forward will result in 35 guys eventually getting displaced from ANC to join the disgruntled DC8 F/Es.
RVR & Roberto how is that math?
Biff
bifff15 is offline  
Old 01-26-2009, 04:25 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SaltyDog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: Leftof longitudinal
Posts: 1,899
Default

Originally Posted by Shaggy1970 View Post
The company is not getting rid of any FE positions! They are going to carry an excess! The company is smart, after the entire trickle down displacements happened, the most junior will fill the empty spots left by the old dudes moving to the front seat! The number will remain the same and 146 of the most junior will be sitting sideways!
Shaggy,
Concur, except the over 65's will still be sitting S/O's. Company is in position to save money (less CPT's) and stash extra F/O's as F/E's. 10 less Capts will save UPS nearly a million on the difference alone. Same savings excessing the F/O's to F/E. Good news is that they appear to want to keep everyone on the property to backfill the retirements that will come in 2 years as the last years crop of 63 year olds who returned to the front retire. The retirements will start picking up so everyone will start trickling forward again. As you also point out in a thread later on that UPS is ready if the economy gets worse. <ng>

Originally Posted by Roberto View Post
Page 4 of the bid shows 48 captains displaced, whereas the realignment verbiage says 38 realigned. I do not know why it is shown that way.
Roberto,
Me thinks that is the 10 less Capitains systemwide after the musical chairs. I am going to MD right SDF, so long Ocho, a good ride while it lasted.
SaltyDog is offline  
Old 01-26-2009, 04:53 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
brownie's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2005
Position: 757/767
Posts: 1,128
Default

I don't care who goes where as long as every ipa bro's and sis's stay on the property AND ROBERTO WHATEVER HAPPENS PLEASE DON'T COME BACK TO MIAMI>
brownie is offline  
Old 01-26-2009, 05:09 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Roberto's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: 757/767
Posts: 579
Default

Originally Posted by bifff15 View Post
RVR,
Correct me if I'm wrong but the math will go something like this: Add the number of guys who bid out of the back of the Ocho combined with differences between vacancies and displacements and you have the amount of guys who will eventually get displaced out of ANC to the panel.
Example 1: 10 more vacancies than displacements, plus 25 back seaters move forward will result in 15 guys eventually getting displaced from ANC to join the disgruntled DC8 F/Es.
Example 2: 10 less vacancies than displacements, plus 25 back seaters move forward will result in 35 guys eventually getting displaced from ANC to join the disgruntled DC8 F/Es.
RVR & Roberto how is that math?
Biff
Your examples look correct to me. If UPS displaces as they show on p.4 of the bid, the number of displacements will equal the number of vacancies.

With 57 original FO vacancies, and maybe 40 recurring FO vacancies (from the 46 CPT original vacancies), that is a lot of FO vacancies. Most of those will be filled with junior FE's I think (there are only 40 over-60 FE's who are in the age range, and all of those will not bid).

However, the follow-on displacement bid will send as many junior FO's to the DC8 FE seat as were awarded vacancies, as you said in your first sentence, above. Many of those that go to the FE seat on the displacement will be the junior FE's who just bid off (but never really left), and they will be added to with more junior FO's (from ANC) to equal the senior FE's who upgraded. That is my guess.

brownie: I'm expecting SDFZ FO until we get more 767's. I was hoping to bypass CPT eventually and remain a senior FO, but so far UPS is not cooperating with the bypass age.

Last edited by Roberto; 01-26-2009 at 05:15 PM.
Roberto is offline  
Old 01-26-2009, 06:56 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JustUnderPar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: UPS Captain
Posts: 837
Default

Man......this place is depressing!
JustUnderPar is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Precontact
Cargo
131
01-21-2009 11:50 PM
Capt TedStriker
Cargo
76
01-05-2009 02:07 PM
jungle
Cargo
0
12-10-2008 06:55 AM
FR8K9
Cargo
12
10-06-2008 05:02 AM
TipsyMcStagger
Cargo
56
08-13-2008 02:42 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices