UPS Realignment/Displacement bid is out!
#51
Wasn't arguing your point, more of a general comment after reading many posts and flying the line listening to many complaints. There are some guys that are so angry at the ND's. I have 25 years to go, how can I possibly predict that I will be were I need to be in 25 years. For many, hopefully flying past 60 is not a requirement or even option for them. I was just making the point that guys are very quick to celebrate their current status/situation in life and not always think there are others not as fortunate due to bad luck/timing/decisions. Pride comes before the fall ...
#52
Wasn't arguing your point, more of a general comment after reading many posts and flying the line listening to many complaints. There are some guys that are so angry at the ND's. I have 25 years to go, how can I possibly predict that I will be were I need to be in 25 years. For many, hopefully flying past 60 is not a requirement or even option for them. I was just making the point that guys are very quick to celebrate their current status/situation in life and not always think there are others not as fortunate due to bad luck/timing/decisions. Pride comes before the fall ...
If I'm doing this past 60, I'm either doing something very wrong or life would have given me a huge kick in the jimmy over the next quarter century...
#54
Banned
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
#55
I thought that during a realignment bid, only those members who are in excess positions (ONT and DC8 Capts and FO's in this case) would be allowed to bid on the listed vacancies.
In pure vacancy bid, however, everyone could bid on vacancies.
Am I smoking crack or what? According to 14.F.4:
In a realignment vacancy bid there will be no transitions or
upgrades to excess vacancies.
In pure vacancy bid, however, everyone could bid on vacancies.
Am I smoking crack or what? According to 14.F.4:
In a realignment vacancy bid there will be no transitions or
upgrades to excess vacancies.
#56
To those who disparage the over 60 crowd, if its any consolation, alot of these guys lost a ton of cash in the market/retirement accounts, The ultimate irony is if they had retired at age 60 they would probably have much more cash in their retirement accounts then they'll have when they retire at 65!! due to the m
arket crash. So they are working for nothing, cept some benefits...Ironic
arket crash. So they are working for nothing, cept some benefits...IronicThe well know (or maybe not) strategies of "retirement savings/investment" evolving as an investor nears retirement, was missed (a claim but maybe there was no plan to retire) by many of the O60. So a quick review for those here; If you are thinking about retiring within the next 5-7 years, remove your ASSets from aggressive growth funds/stocks and into bonds and money markets for security...
#57
Quit the over-60 BS. Waste of time and ****es everyone off. It's done.
Let's talk about what everyone JUNIOR really wants to know--
How far from the bottom of the overall seniority list do you need to be to avoid plumbing vocation school? 100? 140?
Let's talk about what everyone JUNIOR really wants to know--
How far from the bottom of the overall seniority list do you need to be to avoid plumbing vocation school? 100? 140?
#58
Compound Interest Calculator
So, assuming the junior guy's pay is reduced 40K per years as a result of FO to FE trasnsition (2009 pay scale), three years would be roughly 117K...the affects are real...
#59
Compound Interest Calculator
So, assuming the junior guy's pay is reduced 40K per years as a result of FO to FE trasnsition (2009 pay scale), three years would be roughly 117K...the affects are real...
#60
This is insanity, and very depressing. Who's driving this bus anyway?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



