Notices

S3A.....Again

Old 10-28-2020 | 06:35 PM
  #71  
notEnuf's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,215
Likes: 663
From: ir.delta.com
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying
they do, in fact, work for delta air lines inc. DGS is no longer a wholly owned subsidiary but endeavor is
This is going nowhere just as it did in the 90s when Delta bought ASA and Comair. This wouldn't be a problem nor would Delta furloughs be happening if we brought the flying in house but... Egos. Keep Delta my Delta and all. With this attitude we will never fix SCOPE. Who would have guessed a stapler was such a powerful tool?
Reply
Old 10-28-2020 | 06:35 PM
  #72  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,982
Likes: 0
From: 3+ hour sit in the ATL
Default

GF to your contract piece:

Personally I think it IS worth the effort to secure better priority for our retirees. Its a disservice what they got with the EDV S3A piece and we need to rectify that. Not a huge cost item for us either. In fact not sure we would have to give up anything for it since EDV are not Delta employees.
Reply
Old 10-28-2020 | 06:37 PM
  #73  
Cogf16's Avatar
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 993
Likes: 0
From: VEOP Retired! 7ER A was last position
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying
The problem lies in the fact that by bumping endeavor down in priority we create a tangible cost to delta because they have to spend more money buying people off oversold flights or the operation of endeavor (carrying DL pax and generating revenue for our PS check whenever they come back) suffers. This is not a 0 cost item to delta and will require negotiation capital to change. I personally would rather we focus that negotiation capital on issues that affect current DL pilots or tangible monetary benefits for retirees (like improvements to retiree medical). if this is truly a huge issue let’s address it in section 1 of our contract.
Commuter policy in affect. What is it, use more than a few times, you get counseled? Or words to that effect. Everything has a cost. If Endeavor pilots can't get to work without using PS, that's their problem. Delta pilots deal with this every day.
Reply
Old 10-28-2020 | 06:38 PM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 1,285
Likes: 0
From: 175 CA
Default

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano
Delta decided to buy SkyChefs tomorrow and kept them as a separate entity, would they be Delta employees?
As far as the security and exchange commission is concerned, yes. In your scenario if sky chefs committed fraud Ed Bastian would go to jail.

Most major banks are set up in the same way. Retail banking Inc, institutional banking Inc, investment banking Inc.

The CEO of J.P Morgan doesn’t get to say “that fraud was the losers in retail banking At Chase, We’re the REAL JPM bankers, and not liable”.

Mainline pilots just believe it’s somehow different for them because surely, they must be on a higher level than everyone else.
Reply
Old 10-28-2020 | 06:38 PM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 5,521
Likes: 193
From: UNA
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
This is going nowhere just as it did in the 90s when Delta bought ASA and Comair. This wouldn't be a problem nor would Delta furloughs be happening if we brought the flying in house but... Egos. Keep Delta my Delta and all. With this attitude we will never fix SCOPE. Who would have guessed a stapler was such a powerful tool?

^^^^^this^^^^^ I’ll say it one more time, fix section 1 and this won’t be an issue
Reply
Old 10-28-2020 | 06:43 PM
  #76  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 5,521
Likes: 193
From: UNA
Default

Originally Posted by Cogf16
Commuter policy in affect. What is it, use more than a few times, you get counseled? Or words to that effect. Everything has a cost. If Endeavor pilots can't get to work without using PS, that's their problem. Delta pilots deal with this every day.
if said pilot is pulled in and points out the reason they couldn’t make it to work is because retirees were bumping them off flights, how is it their fault. Without a PS clause at my regional and retirees going ahead of me I missed 6 flights in a row trying to get to work while S3Bs made it on at least a few of those flights...what was I supposed to do?
Reply
Old 10-28-2020 | 06:56 PM
  #77  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 6
From: 737 A
Default

Originally Posted by Drum
If you are non-reving - not for work - what diff does it make, no one is buying anyone off. Your priority should not be higher than a delta employee, present or retired.

I don't get it. If you have to commute to work, pretty sure you have a commuter clause in your contract. We do.

It's simple, follow it if you are going to work. You're covered. Otherwise I don't get what you are trying to push here.
As a former EDV pilot I’ll stay out of the should EDV have S3A end of the pool. But I can give some context on what was happening just prior to the change.
EDV commuter clause is basically similar to ours. You are required to allow for 2 flights as a non rev or js. The 2nd flight must be on Delta paint to allow the company a positive space option. The main difference for the Delta commute is: EDV doesn’t have the ability to book the jumpseat even on EDV flights.
At Endeavor after the 1st flight is missed, the pilot is supposed to call crew scheduling. The EDV scheduler has discretion to positive space the pilot.

now some context
After EDV became wholly owned, Delta shifted the flying from MSP/DTW/MEM to a very heavy NYC/ATL component without increasing total block hours. That turned a lot of people into commuters almost over night. Delta was on a mission reducing the number of contact carriers. Comair had just happened and the Mesa lawsuit over competed flights had just happened or was in court at the time.

The Mesa lawsuit was a huge wake up call to the contract carriers. Prior to that most companies would give up landing slots in NY or bend over backwards in anyway possible to accommodate mainline in an IROP. After the lawsuit Endeavor was going to make sure flights were completed no matter what, and that staffing wasn’t going to be an issue specifically in NYC. To ensure departures EDV bumped a lot of paying passengers for commuting pilots. These passengers were mostly flying between hubs, and several that were connecting out of JFK. Delta management did not like that, so they choose to increase EDV boarding priority. There may have been some spite towards the Delta pilots factored into the equation, but I don’t think that was the main driver for DL management.

now that the change has occurred and Delta achieved less passengers being bumped for commuters, retiree priority will be hard to get back.
Like everything it is probably negotiable, but I for one have that waaaaaaay down my list of things to negotiate for.
Reply
Old 10-28-2020 | 06:57 PM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,816
Likes: 5
From: retired 767(dl)
Default

I'm pretty much king of the S3b's, if I get on, just about every one behind me does too. That is just the way it works with loads.
Reply
Old 10-28-2020 | 06:57 PM
  #79  
notEnuf's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,215
Likes: 663
From: ir.delta.com
Default

Originally Posted by Varsity
As far as the security and exchange commission is concerned, yes. In your scenario if sky chefs committed fraud Ed Bastian would go to jail.

Most major banks are set up in the same way. Retail banking Inc, institutional banking Inc, investment banking Inc.

The CEO of J.P Morgan doesn’t get to say “that fraud was the losers in retail banking At Chase, We’re the REAL JPM bankers, and not liable”.

Mainline pilots just believe it’s somehow different for them because surely, they must be on a higher level than everyone else.
Just to add to this...
Here's the list of subsidiaries of DELTA AIR LINES, INC. as of December 31, 2019.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/d...12019ex211.htm
Reply
Old 10-28-2020 | 07:02 PM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,558
Likes: 0
Default

Seems to me that pressure should be applied in whatever way possible to get s3a limited to active EDV employees going to or from work. An option on travelnet with audits to insure proper use could be an option until IT can accomplish the task. If we can get 1972 iCrew to limit Jumpseat booking to proper days I have to imagine they can manage the same for s3a.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cogf16
Delta
46
07-08-2020 09:36 PM
Cogf16
Delta
233
08-30-2019 09:19 PM
preflight
Endeavor Air
56
05-11-2019 11:53 AM
musketeer
Endeavor Air
759
12-06-2018 09:00 AM
42jeff
Endeavor Air
20
05-28-2018 07:47 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices