![]() |
|
|
RG III? Wow!
But Luck? I can hear Payton laughing from MY house! BUT...Payton better put up some numbers tonight and not do what his little bro did, or they're going to have to shoot a new comercial! |
Originally Posted by nwaf16dude
(Post 1258419)
Slow news day, so heres something moderately interesting... DAL just added HOU, BNA, and MKE to 757/767 jepps. It's probably nothing, but might be making ready for an attack on the canyon blue menace. Talk amongst yourselves...
|
Does anyone know what the SD MLOA letter was all aobut over the weekend? The way I understand it, they will start tracking non-exempt ML starting 1 Jan 2010. Does this mean those on long-term orders without the exempt statement on them will be approaching 3 years "non-exempt" leave despite the total length of current orders (obviously assuming start date pre 2010)? Makes sense being tracking hasn't been real consistent, especially pre-merger tracking. Gives everyone plenty of heads-up and provides a level field for both pre-merger groups.
|
Originally Posted by Schwanker
(Post 1258480)
Does anyone know what the SD MLOA letter was all aobut over the weekend? The way I understand it, they will start tracking non-exempt ML starting 1 Jan 2010. Does this mean those on long-term orders without the exempt statement on them will be approaching 3 years "non-exempt" leave despite the total length of current orders (obviously assuming start date pre 2010)? Makes sense being tracking hasn't been real consistent, especially pre-merger tracking. Gives everyone plenty of heads-up and provides a level field for both pre-merger groups.
Not sure what happens to the pre-2010 orders.:confused: |
RetiredFTS-
PM sent |
Originally Posted by RetiredFTS
(Post 1258490)
Last year I tried to get DL HR's official interpretation of a set of orders I was executing regarding exempt status. I was told that they would not make a determination on them until I came back (their decision was going to determine whether I needed to come back sooner than later). My two cents is that this now allows the employee to see how the company is treating the orders (no surprises). Not all orders have an exempt statement but are still exempt if they support GWOT contingency ops.
Not sure what happens to the pre-2010 orders.:confused: |
Originally Posted by crazyjaydawg
(Post 1258423)
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1258501)
Rumor only but I heard there have been complaints by junior pilots that a lot of the pilots out on long term Mil leave are not on exempt orders but staying out on a volunteer basis to get there 20 years in. Some have felt they are coming back on the list above them when they are not entitled to that under federal law.
|
Originally Posted by The Chow
(Post 1258502)
Ginger or Maryann?
Mrs. Howell! :D |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:08 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands