![]() |
|
Originally Posted by sevenfiveseven
(Post 1393236)
3 degrees per second - works with MD89 to the 777. All weights, flaps settings, .....
Carl |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1393248)
Unless wrong data is used/inputted, then a blind 3 deg/sec will result in a tail strike. That's the issue most here are correctly discussing. "Feeling" the airplane shouldn't be outlawed by procedures that are only necessary when accelerate/go distance is the limiting factor. You need to know how to do a 3 deg/sec takeoff, but only actually use it when needed to meet actual performance requirements.
Carl |
Originally Posted by sevenfiveseven
(Post 1393236)
3 degrees per second - works with MD89 to the 777. All weights, flaps settings, ..... Who here likes blown tire FOD damage? |
Agree with Carl here; at the moment you rotate, there is a brief discovery process that determines whether the numbers you're using are correct. It doesn't matter then where a mistake was made, it just matters that you're validating the process in a very short period, with your capable hands and your superior judgement.
A rotation is an analog event, not a digital process. |
Agree with Carl here; at the moment you rotate, there is a brief discovery process that determines whether the numbers you're using are correct. It doesn't matter then where a mistake was made, it just matters that you're validating the underlying data, and your correct application of the resulting numbers, in a very short period, with your capable hands and your superior judgement.
A rotation is an analog process, not a digital event. |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1393288)
Agree with Carl here; at the moment you rotate, there is a brief discovery process that determines whether the numbers you're using are correct. It doesn't matter then where a mistake was made, it just matters that you're validating the underlying data, and your correct application of the resulting numbers, in a very short period, with your capable hands and your superior judgement.
A rotation is an analog event, not a digital process. |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1393173)
Former Cessna 172 pilots do it best.
Former Brasilia pilots find every airplane afterwards to be very simple and safe. |
Originally Posted by Flybywine
(Post 1393296)
That's pilot poetry right there boys.
Love your runway, and your runway will faithfully welcome you back. |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1393311)
I just don't think it's very appropriate to try to slam your tail skid on the way out, onto something you tried to kiss ever so subtly on the way in. I figure a runway should only be faintly aware of my departure by the void it feels until my next gentle, soft visit.
Love your runway, and your runway will faithfully welcome you back. True. Using the logic applied to takeoffs, we should all just chop the power at 50 feet, maintain Vref+5 until impact and apply maximum braking and reverse thrust until a complete stop on a 2 mile long runway. Because someday when its raining in LGA we'll just float all they way down to the end and into the drink. :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by flyallnite
(Post 1393066)
Why, that's because the training department is infallible. The instructors have extensive recency of experience on the line, and the distributed training is both informative and completely comprehensive. Now, back to highlighting the entire F.O.M.
Otoh ...some of those guys are pretty knowledgeable, just wish they were seniority list instructors. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:28 AM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands