|
|
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1498297)
If you are getting an old used minivan, get one of those toyota 4 wheel drive ones. They are still cool in my book.
I'm watching a 2001 Ferrari Modena 360 convertible at auction. It has about 20k miles on it. It's gonna sell around 55k. My friends with ferraris spend waaaay to much shop time on their cars though. 55k is cheap for that car. It has about the same performance as one of my turbo mr2s and it never breaks. Dude... if all your Pilot friends are driving Porsche's, you need a Benz! Janis Joplin - Mercedes Benz - YouTube :D |
Originally Posted by DLpilot
(Post 1498311)
The premiums are on page 14 of the online magazine.
DPMP individual - $151 family - $479 |
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1498282)
None of that stuff in the article matters a whit to us if we're unable to capitalize at the bargaining table.
On one hand, we're ahead of our peers and have played ball better than our peers. And on the other hand, we shouldn't expect to be paid more than our peers. Well, which is it? (not directed at newK specifially). Answer: We should expect to be paid more than our peers. The work we did with the merger ~ ala the smoothness with which it went ~ is helping the company immensely now. We should continue to make significant gains in overall compensation, benefits, and work-rules. Are there people who don't feel this way? :confused: |
Originally Posted by newKnow
(Post 1498346)
We should continue to make significant gains in overall compensation, benefits, and work-rules. Are there people who don't feel this way? :confused: For example, I would say C2012 did not remotely approach even the most generous definition of "significant gains." :eek: |
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1498350)
I think the problem is the definition of "significant" varies.
For example, I would say C2012 did not remotely approach even the most generous definition of "significant gains." :eek: |
It almost seems like we are adding routes that we think is to counter Alaska, and United thinks it is to go against them. They retaliate flooding even more seats onto routes Alaska seemed to enjoy exclusivity on in previous years.
|
Okay, I'll start the talk about pay for Contract 2015. :) Everything else being the same, what's the minimum (within reason) pay hike necessary?
(This ought to be fun!!) :D Denny |
Originally Posted by PilotFrog
(Post 1498396)
It almost seems like we are adding routes that we think is to counter Alaska, and United thinks it is to go against them. They retaliate flooding even more seats onto routes Alaska seemed to enjoy exclusivity on in previous years.
Not too different with united. Tee off enough HVCs in a city and they have nothing to lose by jumping ship to the competition...especially if the competition gives them credit for their old frequent flier program after a certain amount of time. I of course am saying this with the benefit of hindsight. Just remember, to grow, we can't park the planes. |
Originally Posted by Denny Crane
(Post 1498399)
Okay, I'll start the talk about pay for Contract 2015. :) Everything else being the same, what's the minimum (within reason) pay hike necessary?
(This ought to be fun!!) :D Denny Seriously. |
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1498403)
70, 15, 15, 15.
Seriously. Denny |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:53 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands