Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

tsquare 01-01-2014 11:32 AM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1550372)
210/hr X 80 hours per month equals about $202,000 per year.

Carl

Plus 14% retirement contribution is about $230... using your numbers.

Cogf16 01-01-2014 12:08 PM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1548069)
The retirement schedules can accessed from a company computer. The old plan always had the 757 in the fleet through 2024. The question is the rate they are retired. My understanding was about 74 airframes would get heavy checks. They would remain in service through 2021 then those 74 airframes would be phased out over 3 years. The planned current retirements seemed to have been slowed down. I don't know if they are getting heavy checks however. There do not seem to have been any major reductions in captains positions in the 757/767 fleet. FO positions are down but we were carrying a big surplus so you can't take away much from that.
It may be they extend some of the airframes until the 321's start arriving. I am not convinced however that airframe is a real 757 replacement. Lots of air buses stopping for gas on transcontinental the week before Xmas including a few new 321's. Winds did however really suck. 175 on the nose over BUF. The 757's were fine however.

Jumping in late but I have heard a number for -200's of 60 or 72. I know a heavy check on a 75 is 9 to 10 million, of which 6 mil is the motors! Too bad as its twice the airplane of a 321 or 737. Heard the 900ER's are already underperforming. We can only hope.....

johnso29 01-01-2014 12:14 PM


Originally Posted by Cogf16 (Post 1550652)
Jumping in late but I have heard a number for -200's of 60 or 72. I know a heavy check on a 75 is 9 to 10 million, of which 6 mil is the motors! Too bad as its twice the airplane of a 321 or 737. Heard the 900ER's are already underperforming. We can only hope.....

Big surprise there. :rolleyes: (not directed at you)

Cogf16 01-01-2014 12:17 PM


Originally Posted by ITSALLGOOD (Post 1548419)
I've done multiple legs DTW to West Coast with a completely full 900. Never had any issues...except we always start out around 280-300 - go up to 340ish about 1/2 way.

DTW West Coast isn't the problem, its JFK, MCO, BOS, PHL, EWR etc to SEA, SFO, etc 5 to 6 hour legs, FULL. Trouble in the winter I would assume.

Signed,
BIG 757 supporter!!!!!

Dash8widget 01-01-2014 12:27 PM


Originally Posted by Too Tall (Post 1550628)
Perhaps the new game scheduling is playing is to put everyone on short call day one then assign a long call trip for the next day while you are on short call. You are obligated to acknowledge assignment while on short call, therefore you don't even have the ability to wait until 3 hours prior to make the trip illegal under part 117.

If they give you more than 12 hours notice of an assignment, isn't that, by definition, a long call assignment? And, if so, wouldn't the normal long call rules apply (including the NLT 3 hour acknowledgement)? That is how I've always understood it - doesn't mean I'm right though ;)

Scoop 01-01-2014 12:39 PM


Originally Posted by Dash8widget (Post 1550662)
If they give you more than 12 hours notice of an assignment, isn't that, by definition, a long call assignment? And, if so, wouldn't the normal long call rules apply (including the NLT 3 hour acknowledgement)? That is how I've always understood it - doesn't mean I'm right though ;)


I think what he is getting at is that when they call you on short call and you answer the phone - Bamm they gotcha! :eek: I don't we are afforded the option of hanging up on them because its more than 12 hours out. :)

Scoop

Too Tall 01-01-2014 12:45 PM


Originally Posted by Scoop (Post 1550667)
I think what he is getting at is that when they call you on short call and you answer the phone - Bamm they gotcha! :eek: I don't we are afforded the option of hanging up on them because its more than 12 hours out. :)

Scoop

That's exactly what I mean, and that exactly what happend to me.

johnso29 01-01-2014 12:45 PM


Originally Posted by Too Tall (Post 1550628)
Perhaps the new game scheduling is playing is to put everyone on short call day one then assign a long call trip for the next day while you are on short call. You are obligated to acknowledge assignment while on short call, therefore you don't even have the ability to wait until 3 hours prior to make the trip illegal under part 117.

I don't think Sec 23N will allow that. Unless there is no one left on LC. Or unless they want to pay the LC pilot it should have gone to AND the SC pilot for the same trip.

johnso29 01-01-2014 12:47 PM


Originally Posted by Scoop (Post 1550667)
I think what he is getting at is that when they call you on short call and you answer the phone - Bamm they gotcha! :eek: I don't we are afforded the option of hanging up on them because its more than 12 hours out. :)

Scoop


Originally Posted by Too Tall (Post 1550672)
That's exactly what I mean, and that exactly what happend to me.

Simple solution. Don't answer your phone. If the notice is greater then 12 hours don't acknowledge. Then call DALPA.

sailingfun 01-01-2014 12:58 PM


Originally Posted by Cogf16 (Post 1550652)
Jumping in late but I have heard a number for -200's of 60 or 72. I know a heavy check on a 75 is 9 to 10 million, of which 6 mil is the motors! Too bad as its twice the airplane of a 321 or 737. Heard the 900ER's are already underperforming. We can only hope.....

I got a more recent update. Its not good news however. The 767 fleet will see the retirement of all the small motor aircraft as they come up on heavy checks. That is 9 airframes if I recall. The 1400 series aircraft which is 4 airframes will remain. 3
ER airframes will be converted to transcon domestic for a total of only 7 domestic 767's.
The plan for the 757's has not changed. There will be a total of 70 airframes parked by 2017. The rest will get heavy checks and stick around. All 757-300's will stay. The 757's are going to be reconfigured for 199 seats except the transcon airframes. Not sure exactly how you get 199 seats in the aircraft with a first class. We had 199 at Song in all one class. There is one possible change in the works. We are working on a long term sports charter contract. If that comes through then 10 additional 757's will get heavy checks with 60 being parked.
Near term retirements have slowed but the number of parked airframes 3 years out has not changed unless that sports contract comes through.
All of the above subject to change. 25 757's have been parked so far.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:22 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands