Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

Sink r8 04-04-2014 07:22 PM


Originally Posted by sailingfun (Post 1617132)
I think it's pretty clear they can only call once without breaking the 10 hour rest.

The FAA has a “one phone call” policy that “generally” allows a certificate holder to initiate one phone call during a crewmember’s rest period. If the crewmember voluntarily chooses to answer the phone call, the FAA does not view the phone call as disruptive and breaking the rest period. However, a flightcrew member may have difficulty getting back to sleep after being woken up by a certificate holder’s phone call. In that situation, a flightcrew member may have his/her sleep opportunity interrupted. Thus, a certificate holder runs the risk of interrupting a flightcrew member’s sleep opportunity during the rest period by making a phone call.

Where is that in 117?

What you're discussing is whether the company is violating FAA policy, and you seem to be equating that with pilots violating FAR's. Pilots have a duty not to fly if they're not in compliance with 117.25. If they determine their sleep was interrupted, they need to act accordingly.

If a pilot doesn't determine that they lost the required sleep opportunity, they're not illegal. Maybe it's because they didn't hear the phone, didn't have it on, whatever.

Bottom line: the calls going out do not equate a pilot violating FAR's. They might mean the company has some splainin' to do, and in many cases, multiple calls = interruption from a pilot perspective. In some cases, however, even one call is too many.

Sink r8 04-04-2014 07:27 PM


Originally Posted by chuck416 (Post 1617144)
10 phone calls from SKDS. 5 on the cell, 5 on the house phone. However, I am off tomorrow. If I were scheduled for a less than legal rest, I don't see how I could defend the position of "Sure, I got my 8 hours of un-interrupted FAR required rest". It'll be interesting to see how many guys abide by the FARs, and how many go out on a limb to an indefensible position for the good of the company.

Just to be clear, I'm not trying to help the company out. This is unusual, because of the multiple calls. In most cases, the company abides by the one call policy, but still interrupts you. In that case, you have the right, actually the obligation, not to fly.

For most human beings actually getting the calls, and getting awoken each time, I agree with you: I don't see how you can possibly report fit for duty.

If there is a guy out there that turns his phone off, or doesn't lose sleep over a phone ringing because his girlfriend calls all the time, or whatever, and doesn't determine that his sleep is interrupted... he's not in violation.

Sink r8 04-04-2014 07:28 PM

Well, I have to go to bed, and get some uninterrupted sleep. Good night.

sailingfun 04-04-2014 07:33 PM


Originally Posted by Sink r8 (Post 1617143)
I'm not claiming I know much about 117, but I just read 117.25 (e) and (f), which seems to be the pertinent text, and I'm just saying that we have a duty to not to fly if we (the pilot) determine that the 8-hour sleep opportunity was interrupted. We also have the right to 10 hours free of duty. If you determine that your sleep was interrupted, then I think you should call and get an additional 8 hours sleep opportunity.

No one but you knows whether your opportunity was interrupted, and it's no based on the number of calls. Construction at the hotel might interrupt it, and you might sleep through a phone call, or turn it off and miss the subsequent interruptions. The reason I'm pointing this out, is that you shouldn't link the number of calls with an automatic interruption. In some cases, one is too many. I don't want people to think that the company is allowed to wake them up just once, but two calls is illegal. The regulations don't state that.

I don't know where the one-call "rule" comes from. It's on the 117 FAQ's on deltanet, but so is the nonsense about reserves having to acknowledge earlier than the contract.

I believe the one phone call rule came from the FAA after ALPA and the ATA requested clarification on that section.

Scoop 04-04-2014 07:34 PM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1617070)

Damm, FTB beat me to it!

"Carmen stop robo-calling the Pilots."

"I'm sorry Steve, I'm afraid I can't do that."

Scoop :)

Free Bird 04-04-2014 07:37 PM

For all needing 8 solid hours of sleep just pop an Ambien and you're good to go. Wait, can't do that unless you have 24 hours before you fly?

Out of curiosity, does anyone get 8 hours of sleep before a 04:30 van? I know I can't.

Timbo 04-04-2014 08:04 PM


Originally Posted by Check Essential (Post 1617112)
It will be interesting to see what flight ops does about this. Anybody who acknowledged one of those calls electronically and then turns a wheel in less than 10 hours from that time is subject to getting their ticket pulled by the FAA.
How is Delta going to get around that?


Have no fear, I'm sure that by 2am there will be another round (or 7) of Robo Calls with Steve Dickson telling you it's ok to ignore those earlier Robo Calls...:D

GogglesPisano 04-05-2014 01:48 AM

Numerous robocalls because of a delayed PBS bid package, but if your departure tomorrow is delayed? Crickets.

sailingfun 04-05-2014 03:14 AM


Originally Posted by GogglesPisano (Post 1617223)
Numerous robocalls because of a delayed PBS bid package, but if your departure tomorrow is delayed? Crickets.

Sssh!! It never happened!

Sink r8 04-05-2014 03:20 AM

Crap! I couldn't sleep, because I felt obligated to robo-post on this ridiculous topic...

How ironic.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:26 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands