|
|
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1523487)
You being on a trip now has nothing to do with being one of the "volunteers" on flight pay loss. It only means you're posting for free today.
Carl |
Originally Posted by GunshipGuy
(Post 1523474)
Cool video of Jughead going back in time to get even with some guys who spoke poorly of the 717. Warning, if you didn't like Pulp Fiction do not watch: NSFW.
Now this is how you use a GoPro Only critique: Should have spent more time on these girls. https://fbexternal-a.akamaihd.net/sa...&sw=640&sh=334 |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1523464)
Then ALPA should bring it. I'll look forward to that.
|
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1523576)
My guess is they will wait until they are assured they will win. ;)
In either case, the answer is ... One long wait. Carl "You are one amazing man" - tsquare |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1523455)
DPA is not yet the union of Delta pilots. DPA has a duty to defend itself from attack as does any entity. When DPA officially represents Delta pilots, then your point becomes valid.
Carl Charcter is doing the right thing when you are not going to be held to account. Your argument is that the DPA can engage in "turning pilots in" because it does not officially have the duty to defend ... and that is true. It also says volumes about the DPA's judgement and ethics. So, the DPA will do what it is ethically and morally required to do, only when it has a fiduciary duty to do so. The DPA should admit it called this wrong. The DPA claims ALPA to self serving ... well, how would you charaterize the DPA's behavior. As for your hypothetical; I expect ALPA has considered security and takes responsibility for it's web site. As for me, I want a vote as soon as possible. I want to put the DPA behind us, concentrate on Contract 2015 and getting the US Air / American pilots on board. |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1523589)
Carl,
Charcter is doing the right thing when you are not going to be held to account. Your argument is that the DPA can engage in "turning pilots in" because it does not officially have the duty to defend ... and that is true. It also says volumes about the DPA's judgement and ethics.
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1523589)
So, the DPA will do what it is ethically and morally required to do, only when it has a fiduciary duty to do so.
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1523589)
The DPA should admit it called this wrong. The DPA claims ALPA to self serving ... well, how would you charaterize the DPA's behavior.
Carl |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1523589)
As for your hypothetical; I expect ALPA has considered security and takes responsibility for it's web site.
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1523455)
But my question still stands for you Bar. What if I as a strong DPA supporter wanted to move the demise of ALPA along a little faster by hacking into the ALPA national website, then disconnecting the ability to donate to the ALPA PAC? How would ALPA national treat me?
|
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1523589)
As for me, I want a vote as soon as possible. I want to put the DPA behind us, concentrate on Contract 2015 and getting the US Air / American pilots on board.
Probably best for you to just concentrate on Contract 2015. But how much concentration is required by you to just say yes to management's first offer? Carl |
Originally Posted by orvil
(Post 1523044)
Good question. In the past, at DALPA, we have had a former MEC Chairman, accused of tax evasion and a former LEC Chairman, accused of a scam divorce in order to receive an early pension payout. Both incidents occurred while the parties were in office.
I don't believe DALPA went to bat for them. Does anybody remember? |
Does anyone know the PCS processing order?...ie...what is first...swaps, pickups...PDs...?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:40 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands