![]() |
|
Originally Posted by DAWGS
(Post 1651657)
There you go again bringing us together! I actually have been impressed that it hasn't gone there and most have just discussed the TA. I think most of us are behind ALPA 100%.
Originally Posted by DAWGS
(Post 1193530)
Disingenuous of our chairman....actually BS and I don't appreciate it. Who in the hell are they representing? ....Rhetorical, I know the answer. :mad:
Carl went after my friends unfairly. I take you are a Carl fan. That's fine. The DPA intentionally draws themselves outside the circle of unity in ALPA. When they care to join in and participate, they are welcome. However, publishing inaccurate information is not helpful to the mission of improving the pay and working conditions of Delta pilots (a cause we ostensibly share regardless of representational inclination). |
Originally posted by Bucking Bar: Step 4: Blame ALPA (friends & coworkers) Step 5: When someone corrects "facts" with accurate information, state that someone is a bigot and claim they are responsible for the innaccurate "facts" in reality the accurate information was posted to correct. Then write that their reps should be recalled before even reading your own Council's communications. Or in fewer words for steps 1 through 5: mindlessly repeat the DPA Crew Van news and be surprised, refuse responsibility for one's actions and remain unapologetic. Your step 5 is almost totally unintelligible with the exception of your use of the word "bigot." The closest I've seen to deserving that moniker is you with your universal disdain of your former NWA pilot co-workers. I stand by my statements of how a certain moderator here got unreleased information from a certain rep for the sole purpose of managing the forum miscreants. Nothing to apologize for. That rep shouldn't have done what he did. It was unethical. I know he's your friend and me saying this makes you furious, but you should direct your anger at him. Your last paragraph about DPA is just standard pablum to diminish people with whom you disagree. Enjoy the rest of your Memorial Day. Carl |
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1651596)
Negotiators notes aren't official anyway, but this is:
Nu |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1651664)
And if I was not told that why would I have posted the above well before the news of CDO elimination came out?
If no reps told you this and you made it up, well... Carl |
We had a factual debate.
Then Carl showed up. Flight Info style food fight commenced. |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1651665)
I am confused. Lately your posts have been very targeted at me, mostly for stuff which is the opposite of what was written. I will sign off and apologize for whatever you think I wrote that you found offensive.
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1651665)
Carl went after my friends unfairly. I take you are a Carl fan. That's fine.
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1651665)
The DPA intentionally draws themselves outside the circle of unity in ALPA. When they care to join in and participate, they are welcome. However, publishing inaccurate information is not helpful.
In fairness, you did take down your post that I and others quoted before you could take it down. Maybe you should wait a couple of hours to calm down between the process of thought and post. My .02 Carl |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1651682)
We had a factual debate.
Then Carl showed up. Flight Info style food fight commenced. |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1651682)
We had a factual debate.
Then Carl showed up. Flight Info style food fight commenced. Carl |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1651674)
What does that have to do with anything sailingfun? If two reps told you this wrong information, I'd like to know who they were. Because the reps (and you) were clearly wrong. It wasn't in the implementation date schedule of the original MOU.
If no reps told you this and you made it up, well... Carl |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1651687)
This is just another way of saying there should never be any other entity representing Delta pilots except ALPA. Never. Because any future new representing agency would be "drawing themselves outside the circle of unity in ALPA." That's fine that you hold that opinion, but it needs to be clear.
Carl DPA supporters have been begged to get involved in the process. Mostly they have refused this invitation. Rather than to participate, some have followed their leadership into representational irrelevance followed by criticism and outrage that the process they refused has failed to consider their opinion. Clearly, one can not have it both ways. If you have an idea how we as a pilot group and association can function while actively undermining our representatives I am all ears. My opinion is that shooting your rep in the back weakens his back bone. How does after the fact criticism (which is mostly untrue) help us? How does waiting and hoping the ship sinks help the passengers? If you want to mutiny, please just do it already. I support your legal right to a vote. This has now drug on for four plus years. Otherwise if you don't like the direction we are sailing in there is plenty of opportunities on the bridge and in the engine room. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:30 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands