![]() |
|
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1663215)
Hey whys the stock down 2.10
|
Originally Posted by maddogmax
(Post 1663240)
The Dow Transports are down 117 points due to the unrest in Iraq and a spike in oil prices.
Thx MDM |
Originally Posted by jabwmu
(Post 1663210)
Anyone know when reserves will be made whole for the PD issue regarding part 117? I just checked my paycheck for 6/13/14 and it wasn't in there.
|
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1663209)
The only typing you didn't just save me would be pointing out that our per pilot revenue is exceptionally high. I haven't looked at it since C2012, but I doubt its gone down very much lately, so I'm confident saying we make it rain for the company and the shareholders.
|
Originally Posted by Razor
(Post 1663220)
The company is making a very conscious choice to run many fleets. Any pilot inefficiency is due to management's choice to run an inefficient fleet make up.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1663204)
Call me totally confused by your post. If we are further along in the merger process then are competitors we should be more efficient not less. I think you have it backword. Parker just talked about needing to progress in their merger to increase efficiency.
In 2012, Parker was the head of Us Airways and someone else was the head of American Airlines. They were completely separate. I'm not sure what SWA and Air Tran are doing right now, but I still see Air Tran flights whenever I'm in Atlanta. I believe they are still operating separately, too. You admit that they latest full year data you have is from 2012 and claim that, besides Hawaiian, we are the least efficient. But, in 2012 the airline landscape was completely different than it is now. American had furloughs on the street and hadn't even announced a plan to merge with US Airways. It's not the same American, it won't be the same Southwest, and I won't even get into what I'm hearing has been going on over at United. So, I guess I'm asking, how is it that you are comparing our efficiency with airlines that are completely different than what they were in 2012? I believe whatever data you are using to make that claim is obsolete. |
Originally Posted by Alan Shore
(Post 1663245)
I had heard it said this would happen in the June 13 paycheck. You might call the ALPA office to see for sure.
|
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1663170)
Again... read the post. I have earned far more for far longer than an old USAir pilot will. He can out earn me for the next 5 years, and I will STILL have more in the bank. It is that inconvenient truth about TVM... Why is it that some of you people want to acknowledge TVM when it comes to our loss of pay via concessions, yet when a real world example is right in front of you you cannot see it? What I think it is is that you look at a pay scale... and ONLY a payscale and think that is the measuring stick by which we judge the success/failure of a contract... Myopic is the word you should look up.
The other thing is that we NEED them to top our payrates... and soon. But guess what. That ain't happening, because all they negotiated was a me too clause. SO again, we have to do the heavy lifting. |
Originally Posted by index
(Post 1663216)
sailing- you are the archie bunker of spelling/grammar.
You do realize that many frequent posters on hear post on smart phones, while on the van, etc. I am sure that most of the posters on hear have made similar mistakes - I know I have. :) I care more about how Sailing defines "efficiency" as a Pilot group. Why does block hours flown trump revenue produced? Just as a 777 gives us a revenue advantage per Pilot the multiple fleets gives us a block hour disadvantage per Pilot. If DALPA has to explain our inefficiency block hour wise before the NMB why doesn't the company have to address the revenue advantage that we produce? We as a Pilot group must not accept this inefficiency argument as valid and counter it whenever it comes up. Sailing is correct in that it will be one of managements main arguments for C-15. I have heard concerns about both block hours flown, and sick leave used at different times from DAL leadership personnel. This leads me to believe there is some kind of top down push regarding these issues. There are many ways to define efficiency as a Pilot group - block hours flown is only one and in my opinion not as important as revenue produced per Pilot. Scoop |
Originally Posted by maddogmax
(Post 1663240)
The Dow Transports are down 117 points due to the unrest in Iraq and a spike in oil prices.
According to the Germany-based carrier, the cause of its lower profit is due to labor problems, currency issues and intensified competition from Middle Eastern carriers." |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:18 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands