Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,534
The DCI academy in FL was one of many Mullin/Reid buy high sell low blunders, but it or something just like it could be started again with a couple days profit or the cost of one line of thunderstorms through ATL.
The issue is in the details. If you're talking ab-initio like the DCI academy was, you could push candidates through with current ATP mins in well under 2 years. Possibly DL is trying to get rolled in to the already existing college program hour reduction of 800 TT instead of 1500. I would think they could easily get that approved with any kind of decent program. There's really little real advantage to even attempt to go lower than that, and I don't think it would be realistically aprooved anyway.
If there really will be a significant "shortage" at the student pilot level as well as the ATP mins level into the bottom of the regionals, then any kind of system like this is going to need instructors and lots of them. Getting around 500 hours out of an instructor (still extremely high churn) would only take 6-9 months at a busy school.
If, OTOH, you are implying some kind of puppy mill conspiracy theory where DL starts taking 300 hour wet tickets under a special dispensation, there is no way that's happening, and there wouldn't be anyone to train the next ones in the first place.
I'm incredulous that a DAL pilot admitted here that he let himself be pressured into continuing and then blamed the system/union. How about a reality check?
BTW. I've never been questioned by the company on why I walked off a flight. They pay us to make that call.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,534
Your signature on a release means nothing if you refuse the extension. Your legality whining is just part of the crap that get spewed by you and others on this board everyday. When it came to rubber meeting the road you couldn't step up and say "I'm not going." You were more scared of the boogey man than doing the safe/right thing. The Captain pressured you and you caved.
My offense is that you failed to man up and then you come here and whine about it being everyone's else fault. It is your fault. Live with the decisions you make. It is called being professional.
My offense is that you failed to man up and then you come here and whine about it being everyone's else fault. It is your fault. Live with the decisions you make. It is called being professional.
How about we monetize our sick time into higher hourly rates for everyone, and then all sick calls are unpaid and require a carpet dance? What could possibly go wrong?
In any case you don't have to refuse anything with the company. Just tell the Captain you're not agreeing to an extension and the flight can not legally depart. Call CPSP, call ALPA, call ProStans and finally call the FAA. They can't bully FO's into a fatigue call that may not even be the case and operates under a different system anyway.
I don't think thats a fair assessment of what he's saying. We can't have a system where the CA can say "I'm not extending", head to the hotel and gets paid and fully protected while the FO has to call in fatigued, which may not even be the truth at all, and then have to go through an explanation process and possibly not paid and possibly diciplined.
How about we monetize our sick time into higher hourly rates for everyone, and then all sick calls are unpaid and require a carpet dance? What could possibly go wrong?
In any case you don't have to refuse anything with the company. Just tell the Captain you're not agreeing to an extension and the flight can not legally depart. Call CPSP, call ALPA, call ProStans and finally call the FAA. They can't bully FO's into a fatigue call that may not even be the case and operates under a different system anyway.
How about we monetize our sick time into higher hourly rates for everyone, and then all sick calls are unpaid and require a carpet dance? What could possibly go wrong?
In any case you don't have to refuse anything with the company. Just tell the Captain you're not agreeing to an extension and the flight can not legally depart. Call CPSP, call ALPA, call ProStans and finally call the FAA. They can't bully FO's into a fatigue call that may not even be the case and operates under a different system anyway.
And, to repeat, NEVER have I been questioned when not extending a duty day. I always got paid too.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,534
This is human nature. FO's should have the exact same way to non extend as CA's do. The FAR interpretation from the FAA agrees, yet we are doing it differently for some reason. Didn't we even get that in the last TA? Or is that one of the gains that don't take effect til fall?
So if all sick time was unpaid, you don't think it would be a safety issue? That professional integrity would always win out?
This is human nature. FO's should have the exact same way to non extend as CA's do. The FAR interpretation from the FAA agrees, yet we are doing it differently for some reason. Didn't we even get that in the last TA? Or is that one of the gains that don't take effect til fall?
This is human nature. FO's should have the exact same way to non extend as CA's do. The FAR interpretation from the FAA agrees, yet we are doing it differently for some reason. Didn't we even get that in the last TA? Or is that one of the gains that don't take effect til fall?
Professional integrity must always win out. Anything less than professional performance doesn't deserve to be paid professional wages/benefits.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: SLC ERB
Posts: 467
I just read the release. The statement that says you agree to the max extension simply by signing is no longer on there. The FAA ruled against that practice a few weeks back. Edit: check e reposted on the previous page.
I repeat, signing the release no longer constitutes accepting a max extension.
I repeat, signing the release no longer constitutes accepting a max extension.
i just read the release. The statement that says you agree to the max extension simply by signing is no longer on there. The faa ruled against that practice a few weeks back. Edit: Check e reposted on the previous page.
I repeat, signing the release no longer constitutes accepting a max extension.
I repeat, signing the release no longer constitutes accepting a max extension.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 710
Where exactly was DALPA when the company came out with the auto-extension policy to begin with? Never once did I get an email stating that ALPA had a different interpretation. Just another example of how ALPA is here to manage the "plantation" as another put it a few pages back.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 710
Sailing in 3... 2... 1...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post