Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search
Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-15-2014, 09:08 AM
  #160351  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,534
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah View Post
Delta is pressing the FAA to allow them to take guys under the ATP requirements if they go through Delta's "special" training program that is being setup. It's basically the Delta Academy 2.0.
I'm still not sure what we're talking about WRT this.

The DCI academy in FL was one of many Mullin/Reid buy high sell low blunders, but it or something just like it could be started again with a couple days profit or the cost of one line of thunderstorms through ATL.

The issue is in the details. If you're talking ab-initio like the DCI academy was, you could push candidates through with current ATP mins in well under 2 years. Possibly DL is trying to get rolled in to the already existing college program hour reduction of 800 TT instead of 1500. I would think they could easily get that approved with any kind of decent program. There's really little real advantage to even attempt to go lower than that, and I don't think it would be realistically aprooved anyway.

If there really will be a significant "shortage" at the student pilot level as well as the ATP mins level into the bottom of the regionals, then any kind of system like this is going to need instructors and lots of them. Getting around 500 hours out of an instructor (still extremely high churn) would only take 6-9 months at a busy school.

If, OTOH, you are implying some kind of puppy mill conspiracy theory where DL starts taking 300 hour wet tickets under a special dispensation, there is no way that's happening, and there wouldn't be anyone to train the next ones in the first place.
gloopy is offline  
Old 06-15-2014, 09:09 AM
  #160352  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CheapTrick's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Position: A350
Posts: 629
Default

Originally Posted by Roadkill View Post
Sorry but it sounds to me like cheap trick is a guy who pressures his fo to fly an extension then wants to put the blame on him for not manning up. Sorry but the rapist must bear some blame, not just the victim for wearing a hot dress.
Actually, I'm the guy that has shut down the unsafe operation. Twice as an FO and multiple times as a Captain. The most recent time was this week. It is our basic duty to shut it down when the crew day gets stupid long.

I'm incredulous that a DAL pilot admitted here that he let himself be pressured into continuing and then blamed the system/union. How about a reality check?

BTW. I've never been questioned by the company on why I walked off a flight. They pay us to make that call.
CheapTrick is offline  
Old 06-15-2014, 09:17 AM
  #160353  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,534
Default

Originally Posted by CheapTrick View Post
Your signature on a release means nothing if you refuse the extension. Your legality whining is just part of the crap that get spewed by you and others on this board everyday. When it came to rubber meeting the road you couldn't step up and say "I'm not going." You were more scared of the boogey man than doing the safe/right thing. The Captain pressured you and you caved.

My offense is that you failed to man up and then you come here and whine about it being everyone's else fault. It is your fault. Live with the decisions you make. It is called being professional.
I don't think thats a fair assessment of what he's saying. We can't have a system where the CA can say "I'm not extending", head to the hotel and gets paid and fully protected while the FO has to call in fatigued, which may not even be the truth at all, and then have to go through an explanation process and possibly not paid and possibly diciplined.

How about we monetize our sick time into higher hourly rates for everyone, and then all sick calls are unpaid and require a carpet dance? What could possibly go wrong?

In any case you don't have to refuse anything with the company. Just tell the Captain you're not agreeing to an extension and the flight can not legally depart. Call CPSP, call ALPA, call ProStans and finally call the FAA. They can't bully FO's into a fatigue call that may not even be the case and operates under a different system anyway.
gloopy is offline  
Old 06-15-2014, 09:24 AM
  #160354  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CheapTrick's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Position: A350
Posts: 629
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy View Post
I don't think thats a fair assessment of what he's saying. We can't have a system where the CA can say "I'm not extending", head to the hotel and gets paid and fully protected while the FO has to call in fatigued, which may not even be the truth at all, and then have to go through an explanation process and possibly not paid and possibly diciplined.

How about we monetize our sick time into higher hourly rates for everyone, and then all sick calls are unpaid and require a carpet dance? What could possibly go wrong?

In any case you don't have to refuse anything with the company. Just tell the Captain you're not agreeing to an extension and the flight can not legally depart. Call CPSP, call ALPA, call ProStans and finally call the FAA. They can't bully FO's into a fatigue call that may not even be the case and operates under a different system anyway.
Safety isn't based on whether you get paid or not. Integrity isn't based on whether you paid or not. Do what is right. Be the pilot/person/man you are supposed to be.

And, to repeat, NEVER have I been questioned when not extending a duty day. I always got paid too.
CheapTrick is offline  
Old 06-15-2014, 09:36 AM
  #160355  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,534
Default

Originally Posted by CheapTrick View Post
Safety isn't based on whether you get paid or not. Integrity isn't based on whether you paid or not. Do what is right. Be the pilot/person/man you are supposed to be.

And, to repeat, NEVER have I been questioned when not extending a duty day. I always got paid too.
So if all sick time was unpaid, you don't think it would be a safety issue? That professional integrity would always win out?

This is human nature. FO's should have the exact same way to non extend as CA's do. The FAR interpretation from the FAA agrees, yet we are doing it differently for some reason. Didn't we even get that in the last TA? Or is that one of the gains that don't take effect til fall?
gloopy is offline  
Old 06-15-2014, 09:43 AM
  #160356  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CheapTrick's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Position: A350
Posts: 629
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy View Post
So if all sick time was unpaid, you don't think it would be a safety issue? That professional integrity would always win out?

This is human nature. FO's should have the exact same way to non extend as CA's do. The FAR interpretation from the FAA agrees, yet we are doing it differently for some reason. Didn't we even get that in the last TA? Or is that one of the gains that don't take effect til fall?
Sick leave. FAR interpretation. Both straw men. This FO let himself be bullied into continued flying and complains here that his weakness was ALPA's fault. I sez "Unsat on the FO and his blame game." The responsibility for continuing when he didn't want to or need to is his alone.

Professional integrity must always win out. Anything less than professional performance doesn't deserve to be paid professional wages/benefits.
CheapTrick is offline  
Old 06-15-2014, 10:21 AM
  #160357  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: SLC ERB
Posts: 467
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank View Post
I just read the release. The statement that says you agree to the max extension simply by signing is no longer on there. The FAA ruled against that practice a few weeks back. Edit: check e reposted on the previous page.

I repeat, signing the release no longer constitutes accepting a max extension.
Huh - good to know. I must have missed the bulletin that the company put out about this.
Dash8widget is offline  
Old 06-15-2014, 11:14 AM
  #160358  
Gets Weekends Off
 
shiznit's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: right for a long, long time
Posts: 2,642
Default

Originally Posted by nuguy View Post
i would add one correction to the above:

Do not submit far 117 issues via fcr.

Far 117 issues should, imho, only be reported via asap.

Nu
yes!
Originally Posted by purple drank View Post
i just read the release. The statement that says you agree to the max extension simply by signing is no longer on there. The faa ruled against that practice a few weeks back. Edit: Check e reposted on the previous page.

I repeat, signing the release no longer constitutes accepting a max extension.
yes!
shiznit is offline  
Old 06-15-2014, 11:55 AM
  #160359  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 710
Default

Where exactly was DALPA when the company came out with the auto-extension policy to begin with? Never once did I get an email stating that ALPA had a different interpretation. Just another example of how ALPA is here to manage the "plantation" as another put it a few pages back.
TOGA LK is offline  
Old 06-15-2014, 11:56 AM
  #160360  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Posts: 710
Default

Sailing in 3... 2... 1...
TOGA LK is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices