Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

Elliot 07-11-2014 05:15 PM


Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 1682131)
This is much better.


Thank you. :cool:

Elliot 07-11-2014 05:28 PM


Originally Posted by Purple Drank (Post 1682133)
I hate to break it to you...but this ain't the Army.

I know. :rolleyes:


Originally Posted by Purple Drank (Post 1682133)
We're not here for the "greater good."

All due respect, unbeknownst to you, by some of what you post, YOU are "here for the greater good." You are here for the "greater good" of yourself. The "greater good" of yours and your family's future is dependent on the health of the company. Start acting like an individual, instead of a team player, and see how that benefits the future of your earnings, good sir. :rolleyes:



Originally Posted by Purple Drank (Post 1682133)
We're not here to defend the company with our lives, or "complete the mission" at all costs.

See above.


Originally Posted by Purple Drank (Post 1682133)
What we are here to do is cash in on our expertise and skill set. This is all about dollars and cents. To think otherwise is the pinnacle of folly.

I agree we have a unique skill set. I disagree it is ALL ABOUT dollars and cents.


Originally Posted by Purple Drank (Post 1682133)
Show me the money (and time off).

One might come before the other if it's an "all about me" campaign!!:eek:

Purple Drank 07-11-2014 05:32 PM


Originally Posted by Gearjerk (Post 1682137)
Well, actually, you stated in your post that you "decided not to write-up a discrepancy on an aircraft." That could not only be thought of by the company as a safety violation, but even worse, categorized by the FAA as gross negligence!! :eek:

You might have missed where I mentioned that it was not a safety of flight issue.

Let me see if I understand you on this issue: You are saying that if I were to follow the contract to the letter, I would not be "professional." Is that correct?

Elliot 07-11-2014 05:38 PM


Originally Posted by Purple Drank (Post 1682148)
You might have missed where I mentioned that it was not a safety of flight issue.

Let me see if I understand you on this issue: You are saying that if I were to follow the contract to the letter, I would not be "professional." Is that correct?

I think we're talking past each other now. :) I am not saying you would be "professional" or "unprofessional" by following the contract to the letter.

I am saying, if you choose to go "above and beyond" now, but after six months of C2015 negotiations, choose not to do the same exact thing, because you're upset at the company for taking too long in negotiations, then the poor intent - in my mind - leads to an act of unprofessionalism.

P.S. Some people prefer to term it as leverage. Old NWA called it, "meet B.O.B." :)

Herkflyr 07-11-2014 05:38 PM


Let the lowering of expectations begin.

"Don't worry about pay banding, we practically have it now."

"Reducing profit sharing is a win."

"There is an economic downturn coming in 2016-2017"

"RA will never let our pay rates get too far above our peers"

"We can't make gains because the other employees will want them too"
If true, for once I agree with even a word of what you said. Our leadership ought not to be managing anything downward, especially now.


The pilots here who write this nonsense are very connected and very powerful. No matter that they are kool aid drinking, surrender monkeys carrying management's water and stabbing the Delta pilots in the back.
Nice attitude. What sucks is that you don't even know what you don't even know. These guys actually work hard and put their lives on hold. I am sure they appreciate being called "surrender monkeys." Can I call you a "keyboard commando" who no more represents the typical line pilot than Anna Nicole Smith represented the typical wife of a 90 year old oil tycoon?


There are a thousand reasons why we deserve and will attain "historic" gains in C2015, but the fact that management is sending $2.75 BILLION back to the shareholders in a second round of buy backs and dividends says it all. The profits and free cash flow are so large management does not know what to do with the money so they are returning it to the shareholders.
We absolutely deserve much more, but as I tried to tell you once, you do realize in our capitalist system that all profits are by definition the property of the shareholders? Reread the earlier post I made about Apples $130 billion cash hoard and how Microsoft got rid of $54 billion by stock buybacks and special dividends.


They could have spent this money restoring our bankruptcy contract. They could have paid down the debt further. They could have bought more aircraft. Yet they shrugged their shoulders and said we have so much money we don't know what to do with it, so we are returning it to you.
Possibly. But I don't consider our current contract as it stands a "bankruptcy contract"--not even close. In fact in terms of work rules it exceeds C2K, and while the pay lags, it is not in the same crappy galaxy as the worst of our BK days. In fact most conversations I have with guys run along the lines of "wow, I made a lot of money the past couple of years." This is not because they are all flying 110 hours a month either. It is called lots of modest improvements, all compounded on top of each other.

But you know all that, just don't want to admit it.


Call and write your reps. Back them 100% on their promise of a "historic" C2015. Ref: True headings 14-2 page 3.
Whether I agree with other things you write, this is absolutely true.

Purple Drank 07-11-2014 05:43 PM


Originally Posted by Gearjerk (Post 1682152)

I am saying, if you choose to go "above and beyond" now, but after six months of C2015 negotiations, choose not to do the same exact thing, because you're upset at the company for taking too long in negotiations, then the poor intent - in my mind - leads to an act of unprofessionalism.

You might be spring loaded to the "argue with PD" position. Not that I can blame you. :rolleyes:

My original post was aimed at trying to find a legal, PROFESSIONAL way to show the company exactly how we drive the operation. Nothing more.

For some reason, you went full silly and read into things that just weren't there.

P.s. Show me the money

iceman49 07-11-2014 05:46 PM

Odds and Ends: GAO report on ?Boeing?s bank;? C919; Airbus widebody strategy | Leeham News and Comment

80ktsClamp 07-11-2014 05:47 PM


Originally Posted by Purple Drank (Post 1682157)
You might be spring loaded to the "argue with PD" position. Not that I can blame you. :rolleyes:

My original post was aimed at trying to find a legal, PROFESSIONAL way to show the company exactly how we drive the operation. Nothing more.

For some reason, you went full silly and read into things that just weren't there.

P.s. Show me the money

I thought it was a good post, FWIW. It's amazing when you quantitize how much money we save the company every day by going above and beyond.

Elliot 07-11-2014 05:51 PM


Originally Posted by Purple Drank (Post 1682157)
You might be spring loaded to the "argue with PD" position. Not that I can blame you. :rolleyes:

My original post was aimed at trying to find a legal, PROFESSIONAL way to show the company exactly how we drive the operation. Nothing more.

For some reason, you went full silly and read into things that just weren't there.

P.s. Show me the money

If I misunderstood your initial post. I apologize. (Not "spring loaded to argue with the "PD." :) )

I included an excerpt from your original post below. This is the part that I took as meaning, "if the company fails to see how important we are, we will SHOW THEM." Maybe I read too much into it? (On my third tumbler of Glen Livet!) :eek:

I agree with your assertion, "show me the money!"



Originally Posted by Purple Drank (Post 1682085)
There's our leverage.

Problem is...does the company even realize to what extent we drive the operation?


full of luv 07-11-2014 05:58 PM


Originally Posted by Gnewt (Post 1682136)
Pardon the interuption here.........I have a long nonrev sit with my family in LAX tomorrow. Anyone know if I can escort them down to the pilot lounge, or is that forbiden. Thanks.........carry on

G

Are you military or reserves?? USO outside of terminal 1 is worth the effort to hang in, comfy lounge, free food, lots of video games for the kids and movie rooms.

Otherwise, ride the Hacienda bus (hotel pickup) to the sepulveda area and there are some good restaurants a block south and across the street. I suggest Rubios for the best Baha Mexican food available, again worth the effort if you have more than a few hours.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:51 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands