![]() |
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1682131)
This is much better.
Thank you. :cool: |
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1682133)
I hate to break it to you...but this ain't the Army.
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1682133)
We're not here for the "greater good."
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1682133)
We're not here to defend the company with our lives, or "complete the mission" at all costs.
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1682133)
What we are here to do is cash in on our expertise and skill set. This is all about dollars and cents. To think otherwise is the pinnacle of folly.
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1682133)
Show me the money (and time off).
|
Originally Posted by Gearjerk
(Post 1682137)
Well, actually, you stated in your post that you "decided not to write-up a discrepancy on an aircraft." That could not only be thought of by the company as a safety violation, but even worse, categorized by the FAA as gross negligence!! :eek:
Let me see if I understand you on this issue: You are saying that if I were to follow the contract to the letter, I would not be "professional." Is that correct? |
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1682148)
You might have missed where I mentioned that it was not a safety of flight issue.
Let me see if I understand you on this issue: You are saying that if I were to follow the contract to the letter, I would not be "professional." Is that correct? I am saying, if you choose to go "above and beyond" now, but after six months of C2015 negotiations, choose not to do the same exact thing, because you're upset at the company for taking too long in negotiations, then the poor intent - in my mind - leads to an act of unprofessionalism. P.S. Some people prefer to term it as leverage. Old NWA called it, "meet B.O.B." :) |
Let the lowering of expectations begin. "Don't worry about pay banding, we practically have it now." "Reducing profit sharing is a win." "There is an economic downturn coming in 2016-2017" "RA will never let our pay rates get too far above our peers" "We can't make gains because the other employees will want them too" The pilots here who write this nonsense are very connected and very powerful. No matter that they are kool aid drinking, surrender monkeys carrying management's water and stabbing the Delta pilots in the back. There are a thousand reasons why we deserve and will attain "historic" gains in C2015, but the fact that management is sending $2.75 BILLION back to the shareholders in a second round of buy backs and dividends says it all. The profits and free cash flow are so large management does not know what to do with the money so they are returning it to the shareholders. They could have spent this money restoring our bankruptcy contract. They could have paid down the debt further. They could have bought more aircraft. Yet they shrugged their shoulders and said we have so much money we don't know what to do with it, so we are returning it to you. But you know all that, just don't want to admit it. Call and write your reps. Back them 100% on their promise of a "historic" C2015. Ref: True headings 14-2 page 3. |
Originally Posted by Gearjerk
(Post 1682152)
I am saying, if you choose to go "above and beyond" now, but after six months of C2015 negotiations, choose not to do the same exact thing, because you're upset at the company for taking too long in negotiations, then the poor intent - in my mind - leads to an act of unprofessionalism. My original post was aimed at trying to find a legal, PROFESSIONAL way to show the company exactly how we drive the operation. Nothing more. For some reason, you went full silly and read into things that just weren't there. P.s. Show me the money |
|
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1682157)
You might be spring loaded to the "argue with PD" position. Not that I can blame you. :rolleyes:
My original post was aimed at trying to find a legal, PROFESSIONAL way to show the company exactly how we drive the operation. Nothing more. For some reason, you went full silly and read into things that just weren't there. P.s. Show me the money |
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1682157)
You might be spring loaded to the "argue with PD" position. Not that I can blame you. :rolleyes:
My original post was aimed at trying to find a legal, PROFESSIONAL way to show the company exactly how we drive the operation. Nothing more. For some reason, you went full silly and read into things that just weren't there. P.s. Show me the money I included an excerpt from your original post below. This is the part that I took as meaning, "if the company fails to see how important we are, we will SHOW THEM." Maybe I read too much into it? (On my third tumbler of Glen Livet!) :eek: I agree with your assertion, "show me the money!"
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1682085)
There's our leverage.
Problem is...does the company even realize to what extent we drive the operation? |
Originally Posted by Gnewt
(Post 1682136)
Pardon the interuption here.........I have a long nonrev sit with my family in LAX tomorrow. Anyone know if I can escort them down to the pilot lounge, or is that forbiden. Thanks.........carry on
G Otherwise, ride the Hacienda bus (hotel pickup) to the sepulveda area and there are some good restaurants a block south and across the street. I suggest Rubios for the best Baha Mexican food available, again worth the effort if you have more than a few hours. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:51 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands