|
|
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1722863)
I feel like 717s look shorter in the Delta paint scheme vs the AirTran paint scheme. Does anyone know if our 717s are shorter then theirs?
|
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1722863)
I feel like 717s look shorter in the Delta paint scheme vs the AirTran paint scheme. Does anyone know if our 717s are shorter then theirs?
I heard southwest removed 13.3 feet from the flux capacitor.... |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1722863)
I feel like 717s look shorter in the Delta paint scheme vs the AirTran paint scheme. Does anyone know if our 717s are shorter then theirs?
|
When newK sits down to play Super Mario Bros, it looks like this:
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1722329)
The only problem with fixing the JV imbalance is that they are currently and forecast to be in compliance going forward. They are out of compliance for the 36 month look back.
MEC update today shows the pertinent slides, showing us below 47% (not in compliance) and projecting us at 47% (also not in compliance) at the end of the cure period. Of course the MEC update also incorrectly states that the 2009 LOA 16 raised our share of flying from 47% to 50%, when if fact LOA 16 pegged our share of the JV flying at 51.7% (LOA 16 1.P.4). That would have required a minimum 49.95% on a 3-year look-back on March 30, 2011 and March 30, 2012 and a minimum of 50.2% on a 3-year look-back on March 30, 2013 and subsequent years. In 2010, MOU 14 signed by SD and TO pushed the first measurement out to March 30, 2014 in exchange for increasing our prorated share from 47.6% to 50%. That 2.4% gain (47.6% to 50%) was expected to net Delta pilots an additional 6-7 daily transatlantic flights. Now we are in a position where the company won't even meet a written agreement that provided plenty of flexibility for unknowns, nearly 5 years after it was signed. Sailing, you are somewhat of an authority here and I enjoy reading your posts and the treasure trove of information you provide. It's just that when it comes to the terms and the status of our Transatlantic JV your info isn't accurate. Cheers George |
Originally Posted by georgetg
(Post 1722953)
Sailing, you keep saying that we are and will be in compliance but it's simply incorrect, repeating bad info doesn't make it so....
MEC update today shows the pertinent slides, showing us below 47% (not in compliance) and projecting us at 47% (also not in compliance) at the end of the cure period. Of course the MEC update also incorrectly states that the 2009 LOA 16 raised our share of flying from 47% to 50%, when if fact LOA 16 pegged our share of the JV flying at 51.7% (LOA 16 1.P.4). That would have required a minimum 49.95% on a 3-year look-back on March 30, 2011 and March 30, 2012 and a minimum of 50.2% on a 3-year look-back on March 30, 2013 and subsequent years. In 2010, MOU 14 signed by SD and TO pushed the first measurement out to March 30, 2014 in exchange for increasing our prorated share from 47.6% to 50%. That 2.4% gain (47.6% to 50%) was expected to net Delta pilots an additional 6-7 daily transatlantic flights. Now we are in a position where the company won't even meet a written agreement that provided plenty of flexibility for unknowns, nearly 5 years after it was signed. Sailing, you are somewhat of an authority here and I enjoy reading your posts and the treasure trove of information you provide. It's just that when it comes to the terms and the status of our Transatlantic JV your info isn't accurate. Cheers George The update today clearly stated that they are out of compliance and not projected to be in compliance in no uncertain terms. It even had pretty pictures! |
Originally Posted by georgetg
(Post 1722953)
Sailing, you keep saying that we are and will be in compliance but it's simply incorrect, repeating bad info doesn't make it so....
MEC update today shows the pertinent slides, showing us below 47% (not in compliance) and projecting us at 47% (also not in compliance) at the end of the cure period. Of course the MEC update also incorrectly states that the 2009 LOA 16 raised our share of flying from 47% to 50%, when if fact LOA 16 pegged our share of the JV flying at 51.7% (LOA 16 1.P.4). That would have required a minimum 49.95% on a 3-year look-back on March 30, 2011 and March 30, 2012 and a minimum of 50.2% on a 3-year look-back on March 30, 2013 and subsequent years. In 2010, MOU 14 signed by SD and TO pushed the first measurement out to March 30, 2014 in exchange for increasing our prorated share from 47.6% to 50%. That 2.4% gain (47.6% to 50%) was expected to net Delta pilots an additional 6-7 daily transatlantic flights. Now we are in a position where the company won't even meet a written agreement that provided plenty of flexibility for unknowns, nearly 5 years after it was signed. Sailing, you are somewhat of an authority here and I enjoy reading your posts and the treasure trove of information you provide. It's just that when it comes to the terms and the status of our Transatlantic JV your info isn't accurate. Cheers George |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1722928)
When newK sits down to play Super Mario Bros, it looks like this:
|
Originally Posted by index
(Post 1722465)
johsno,
Bucking Bar in post 167996 "quoted" my post and inserted a picture of a kitten ........ |
Originally Posted by Hawaii50
(Post 1722973)
That's pretty hilarious. At least to me. I wish I knew how to attach a random animal.
http://media-cache-ec0.pinimg.com/23...70c7bdb1dd.jpg http://image.spreadshirt.com/image-s...irt_design.png |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:40 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands