![]() |
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1888192)
How about some good news around here:
The 10ish 767-300 "domestics" that were originally to be parked as A321s come in are now apparently sticking around. Wow. That's a big deal. And a lot of pilots |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1888192)
How about some good news around here:
The 10ish 767-300 "domestics" that were originally to be parked as A321s come in are now apparently sticking around. |
Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez
(Post 1888202)
source? filler
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1888192)
How about some good news around here:
The 10ish 767-300 "domestics" that were originally to be parked as A321s come in are now apparently sticking around. |
Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez
(Post 1888140)
No, what bothers me is that you can't respond like an adult. I actually thought about what you said as it being a collective decision, but chose to leave the post as is because I was interested in knowing what your definition of substandard is. You chose to respond with an attack. Fine. I hope you feel better now.
More drama Instead, you admit to game playing? So transparent you are. |
Originally Posted by TheManager
(Post 1888211)
I see. So your reading comprehension and blind dogma to do all you can to obtain "any" contact before July so you can start working on your final handful of years here wasn't a factor on your response.
Instead, you admit to game playing? So transparent you are. |
Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez
(Post 1888148)
A 'bad" deal will be defined by the collective. To an uber senior guy, bottom end scope is not as important.
News Flash. You're demographic is actually in the minority. We have more new hires and pilots hired pre late 98 (prior furloughed) on the list than 'guys hoping enough other pilots sign their special parting gift hanging in the lounges so they don't look insignificant or like a tool' on our SLI. Do the math. Numbers all verifiable on the flight ops web site. I'm going with game theory science that an agreement that does not have bottom or top end scope provisions that protect or begin to increase our share of the flying, will kill a TA just as quick as buying our raises with profit sharing. Steady hiring, that only accelerated with time since '07, has watered down the 'wide body mafia' considerably. Basically, your likely along for the ride until the end. How much of your picture is going to have ink on the matting?Positive ink, negative doesn't count. Maybe you can fill it out a fraction by hanging it on the fourth floor in the rookery where the penguins live. You know, birds with wings for no apparent reason. |
Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez
(Post 1888213)
*sigh* OK let me try again. What in your mind is so substandard that it wouldn't pass group's muster?
1.) Third party verification and evaluation in relation to the use of sick leave. 2.) Touching profit sharing inside of section six. Both are mortally toxic. 3.) Is highly detrimental to any TA. Wrapping a JV grievance settlement up in the contract. |
Originally Posted by newKnow
(Post 1888207)
That is good news. Is that an official announcement?
|
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1888132)
Ah, there it is. The ubiquitous ALPA straw man argument. The "just say no crowd." Hint: that crowd is growing exponentially every day.
And it's stunning how fast ALPA went from promising an "historic" contract to dispatching messengers here to tell us that if we vote down a crappy TA, we have "unreasonable contract demands." I'm happy to wind the clock and cash profit sharing checks until RA figures it out. I'd wager many of "those approaching retirement" will be just fine doing the same. Profit sharing removes the TVM argument right now. Who cares about dragging out negotiations. Status quo doesn't suck and it sucks far far less than concessions during a time of significant profitability. I don't have any rumor specifics except for some of the hot potatoes that I read here. I have a hard time believing them because they are so ridiculous. If they are true, then how could anyone possibly cheerlead them? There is absolutely no acceptable reason for concessions in this environment and no reason to get a speedy substandard TA. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:27 AM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands