Originally Posted by 4fans (Post 2170378)

Man that was a fast turnaround on the AE results!

Originally Posted by casual observer (Post 2170457)

Any chance for a link to the AE results? (can't get to on my layover)

Originally Posted by 4fans (Post 2170378)

Man that was a fast turnaround on the AE results!

Originally Posted by tunes (Post 2170405)

thats what happens when its small and 95% narrow-body FO openings :D

Originally Posted by Herkflyr (Post 2170548)

It's funny because it is true!

Originally Posted by SluggoC17 (Post 2170583)

Narrowbody airline!

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 2159465)

Ended up with a 320 with the "-A1" engines flying ATL-BZN-ATL a few weeks ago. It was fine getting out there, but let's just say 31 people bought off later and we finally could leave for ATL.

Originally Posted by HTBH (Post 2170343)

Anybody know how many of the AE positions are still vacant and to be filled?

And, I've got to ask the question: why are they still awarding 747 F/O positions? Look at the August reserve list on that thing compared to any narrowbody aircraft in NYC. Can we borrow some of these guys??? And that isn't a jab at 747 guys. If I could hold it, I would and gladly commute to reserve. But I don't understand the logic behind awarding that to people when they appear to have more reserves than they know what to do with, the summer months are over and the fleet is shrinking. Meanwhile...in narrowbody NYC land there isn't a single day of positive reserve coverage on the 717, M88, A320, or 757 (and just a handful on the 737 right at the minimum level). Again....not an attack on the widebody guys. I hope to be one of you someday. It just makes no sense to me why they underman NYC so much and keep adding bodies to fleets that seem to have plenty of bodies already. I'm hoping the 500 new hires coming July through October will help things out with some schedule flexibility and coverage.