![]() |
Oh oh. FtB is using critical thinking skills tonight :eek:
|
NewKnow;
Trust me I agree 100% At a min we will have two airlines that have no furloughs. (HA or AS) We recently hired and may do so again. HA is hiring and the latest vacancy bid at AS shows more furloughed pilot returning. I know I want as much seniority as I could get with either one of them. I personally think that HA would be easier since they have the same spectrum of flying we do. AS would hurt if there were not very large fences. |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 883850)
What about a 330 base without closing an existing base?
|
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 883855)
NewKnow;
Trust me I agree 100% At a min we will have two airlines that have no furloughs. (HA or AS) We recently hired and may do so again. HA is hiring and the latest vacancy bid at AS shows more furloughed pilot returning. I know I want as much seniority as I could get with either one of them. I personally think that HA would be easier since they have the same spectrum of flying we do. AS would hurt if there were not very large fences. In event of a merger and acquisitions and constructive notice, Compass and Mesaba pilots who are to be brought up, shall be considered to have seniority numbers etc., etc. Or, do we have that? Nevermind. I'm putting too much thought into it. I guess the SWA/Air Tran merger has me thinking too much. :) |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 883850)
What about a 330 base without closing an existing base?
The company has never been shy about rebasing if they have the sim capacity. Much of the training department is a fixed cost. I think in the next 2 years you will see a 330 base in ATL. Look at the international terminal any afternoon and the answer comes clear. |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 883814)
I hope we put newKnow on the merger comm :)
I happen to like Chicken Little. He is a great thinker. If you design a system for the worst case scenario, test and improve it ... it works great & holds up under stress. new ... Thanks for the idea ! Take heart everyone...just got the new logo if we merge with Alaska... http://lh3.ggpht.com/_9n3hp9td5Is/TL...B8Wc0/Carl.jpg Carl |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 883855)
AS would hurt if there were not very large fences.
Either way, I don't see how the Alaska pilots (for example) would need to be fenced off our equipment to protect us. In a relative ratio methodology, they presumably wouldn't be able to invade our categories. It's not really much of a base issue, since we have a lot of bases in common, in the half of the country where they're more likely to live. A fair relative ratio approach wouldn't put many of them in a position to bid WB equipment. So wouldn't it better to advocate for a fenceless, relative-ratio approach that would follow recent precedents, including our own? |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 883867)
Take heart everyone...just got the new logo if we merge with Alaska...
http://lh3.ggpht.com/_9n3hp9td5Is/TL...B8Wc0/Carl.jpg Carl |
Maybe Sink. I know a lot of AS guys and where they commute from may surprise you. I mean that.
I would love to see something without fences, but the reality is that for them or us to maintain their same QOL, it would be quite an interesting ratio. It would work in a static environment. With No WB slots it makes it an interesting debate. As you extrapolate that out is where it gets interesting. I have some buds that have been there since 2001 and are about ready to upgrade. A 73N A that would be in the same position as a pilot hired in 1990 here at DAL. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 883864)
A new 747 base would actually generate very little training. A high percentage of Captains on the aircraft commute already. Most would simply commute to where ever the aircraft were based. For many it would mean it could mean a shorter commute. I bet the actual turnover on a rebase would be well under 20 percent. Guys in their last few years don't like to go to school. There would be more movement in the FO ranks but being a fenced aircraft I don't think it would be huge.
The company has never been shy about rebasing if they have the sim capacity. Much of the training department is a fixed cost. I think in the next 2 years you will see a 330 base in ATL. Look at the international terminal any afternoon and the answer comes clear. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:29 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands