Airline Pilot Central Forums - Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Maybe that's why they DIDN'T call it a raise.... :mad:

...the end of month payment for a pilot with given years of longevity will increase by 60 percent on average to the amounts shown in the table found in MOU #15....

Pineapple Guy

01-21-2011 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by capncrunch (Post 934031)

I'm working on my phone and never go to the ALPA site so I don't have access.

You're a DAL pilot and you never go to the ALPA site, but come on here asking questions that are easily answered, and making allegations that are easily refuted.

Nice.

Sink r8

01-21-2011 04:40 PM

deeee-lee-ted

capncrunch

01-21-2011 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy (Post 934069)

You're a DAL pilot and you never go to the ALPA site, but come on here asking questions that are easily answered, and making allegations that are easily refuted.

Nice.

Ok General Lee. After your last few posts it sounds like Flight Info may be a better fit.

slowplay

01-21-2011 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sink r8 (Post 934070)

deeee-lee-ted

Why? I was LMAO!:D

hockeypilot44

01-21-2011 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 934007)

Wages which we voted for. Remember that. Also remember that contrary to popular belief the negotiators are directed to go for what the pilots want. Want pay no matter what, of course they have to give in other areas. It is the nature of the business. Especially in section six.

Enjoy your crossing.

We vote the way ALPA tells us to. Don't kid yourself. At US Airways, ALPA knew the pilots would not vote away their pension so ALPA didn't let them vote. This lead to ALPA being de-certified. The SLI was a huge part of it, but the pension was just as big of a deal. ALPA is very persuasive when it comes to voting. It almost always gets its groups to vote for tentative agreements.

scambo1

01-21-2011 05:30 PM

CAL
777-200: 22
767-400: 16
767-200: 10
757-300: 21
757-200: 41
737-900ER: 30
737-900: 12
737-800: 126
737-700: 35
737-500: 39

UAL
747-400: 26
777-200: 52
767-300: 35
757: 97
A320: 97
A319: 55

When you look at the combination of UCALs fleets, you see 1. what a powerhouse fleet combo they will have. 2. That there are some jets they may likely shed: 76-200s, 76-400s (maybe), Some United 777s.

Comments, postulations?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJ402U4cN3Q

forgot to bid

01-21-2011 05:42 PM

26 744s and 74 772s vs our...

iaflyer

01-21-2011 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scambo1 (Post 934087)

When you look at the combination of UCALs fleets, you see 1. what a powerhouse fleet combo they will have. 2. That there are some jets they may likely shed: 76-200s, 76-400s (maybe), Some United 777s.

I think the 767-400s are the only ones the "might" get rid of. The 767-200s are actually very new, they are from 2000-2002 or so. Replacement for DC-10s. The United 777 are some of the first ones off the line, so 1995, which makes them 16 years old - middle aged really for a long-haul airliner. also, United uses them like we use the ER: flies them all over, and some domestic too.

CAL flies the 757-200, 757-300, 767-200, 767-300 and 767-400 as one category, so there's no extra pilots sitting around for the different categories. I bet their network people love those, as they can use big or small airplanes depending on the season.

forgot to bid

01-21-2011 05:46 PM

hence we will be one category for 757, 763 and 764 fleet one day.

i agree with ia, those 762s are practically brand new. it was the 764 CAL was most disappointed with.

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:36 PM.

Page 5772 of 20174