![]() |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 963940)
They already have. Capacity will only grow 1%-3% vs 2%-5% & the announcement to retire the DC9-50's in the next 12-24 months was made. Also, RJs will continue to be parked while less capacity with more frequency will be replaced with less frequency & more capacity.
Of course it all comes down to are people flying and are airlines charging sustainable fares? If UAL cuts 54 mainline aircraft (all 75-76 domestic I think) that would be a huge gift for VA and WN as I'm sure much of that capacity would come out of the bay area and metro Chicago. Especially with VA desperate to invade ORD. Panic capacity cuts a decade ago did nothing but throw gas on the brushfires of LCC growth. All it pretty much did was transfer capacity to the LCC's which put more price pressure on the legacies doing the transferring in the first place. Well, that and make no talent hack worthless MBA types think you could transport the entire world 50 seats at a time and order thousands of RJ's just in time to start panic parking them after they all showed up. :rolleyes: In any case, I find it mind boggling that no one cares in the slightest about 90 dollar oil as a permanant mean average price floor and can actually be very bullish about the industry at that price, but suddenly at 101 dollar oil the sky is falling and we (the industry) had better start parking everything and putting people on large RJ's and letting the LCC's grow faster than Barry Bond's biceps. If demand is there, and it appears to be at least if you've been on a flight or walked through an airport anytime in the last year or so, then a 10 or 20 dollar price spike in oil shouldn't make our supposedly best and brightest pundits in the boardrooms or investment community scream like its a pending industry apocalypse. JMHO. |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 963921)
So a competitor is subsidized and compensated either way. Brilliant. Maybe we can hire Southwest to overfly their own routes out of ATL too while we're at it.
|
Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
(Post 963945)
I must be honest, I am ignorant on all of this stuff. And if what you say is true, and I believe you, what does that mean to Mother D? Do we really expect Mother D to not use those airplanes and lift?
|
For those trying to stay in touch with loved ones in Japan.
Verizon Makes Calls Free to Japan from March 11 to April 10 -- NEW YORK, March 14, 2011 /PRNewswire/ -- AT&T Offers Wireless, Wireline Billing Relief for Consumers Calling and Texting Family, Friends in Japan |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 963967)
That's what I was wondering. Is this recent UAL chatter on an equivalent timeline as the older Delta capacity announcement, which was basically a non announcement? Or is this a new cutting edge capacity announcement that DL will feel pressured to "one up" to please the pundits?
Of course it all comes down to are people flying and are airlines charging sustainable fares? If UAL cuts 54 mainline aircraft (all 75-76 domestic I think) that would be a huge gift for VA and WN as I'm sure much of that capacity would come out of the bay area and metro Chicago. Especially with VA desperate to invade ORD. Panic capacity cuts a decade ago did nothing but throw gas on the brushfires of LCC growth. All it pretty much did was transfer capacity to the LCC's which put more price pressure on the legacies doing the transferring in the first place. Well, that and make no talent hack worthless MBA types think you could transport the entire world 50 seats at a time and order thousands of RJ's just in time to start panic parking them after they all showed up. :rolleyes: In any case, I find it mind boggling that no one cares in the slightest about 90 dollar oil as a permanant mean average price floor and can actually be very bullish about the industry at that price, but suddenly at 101 dollar oil the sky is falling and we (the industry) had better start parking everything and putting people on large RJ's and letting the LCC's grow faster than Barry Bond's biceps. If demand is there, and it appears to be at least if you've been on a flight or walked through an airport anytime in the last year or so, then a 10 or 20 dollar price spike in oil shouldn't make our supposedly best and brightest pundits in the boardrooms or investment community scream like its a pending industry apocalypse. JMHO. |
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 963930)
The National Mediation Board is about to declare Republic a "single transportation system". That means the codesharing with Delta has to end because it violates the scope clause in the Delta pilot contract.
If I am not mistaken that language was removed. I do not see it in our contract now. You can be assured Republic would not flip the switch on the gravy feed. Also, Delta's been contracting for a lot more RJ lift lately. Since those jets are contracted for longer terms than our 90 day furlough notice requirement, I will give you one guess who's job becomes the accumulator in the system if Delta needs to shed capacity. The next least efficient airplane in the system after the DC9 is the MD88. |
Originally Posted by flyBanana
(Post 963894)
This might mean something else. Those runs are old Midwest routes, which is currently done by Republic... Either Mother D is going for the kill, or they think there will be void in those routes. maybe?
|
Originally Posted by RunFast
(Post 963883)
Anyone using iPad with icrew and/or icrewmax? Can you put firefox on the iPad or are guys just using atomic web/journey like on the phone?
Sorry if I'm repeating questions but I'm in the store typing this up.... |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 964074)
Can you be specific what language you are referring to?
If I am not mistaken that language was removed. I do not see it in our contract now. You can be assured Republic would not flip the switch on the gravy feed. |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 963705)
On another topic, I'm seriously concerned with the domestic product DAL is providing. My last 4 day had one leg that left on time & arrived early. That's out of 7 legs. In LAS, the longest runway is closed for construction. We took a 30 minute delay for them to figure out how many people we could take. Why do they NOT know this BEFORE we board? After we boarded they wanted to pull the jetway back up and remove 2 pax. Absolutely unacceptable. It caused us to be behind the rest of the day, arriving at our overnight 30+ minutes late.
This is the 2nd trip in a row where our on time performance tanked. Something has to change. The product is just terrible right now. Granted we haven't seen ATL since we left on Saturday and DTW isn't involved either (which has been the largest source of my delays as of late- the DTW mechs seem to be having a bit of a learning curve with the 737...). |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:22 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands